On 25/01/2015 11:00 PM, Ian Wells wrote:
Lots of open questions in here, because I think we need a long conversation
on the subject.
On 23 January 2015 at 15:51, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like a change to using internal RPC interfaces would be pretty
unstable at this
On 26 January 2015 at 15:30, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
Lots of open questions in here, because I think we need a long conversation
on the subject.
On 23 January 2015 at 15:51, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like a change to using internal RPC interfaces would be
On 28 January 2015 at 17:32, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
E.g. its a call (not cast) out to Neutron, and Neutron returns when
the VIF(s) are ready to use, at which point Nova brings the VM up. If
the call times out, we error.
I don't think this model really works with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
If the problem is too many round trips our the interaction being too chatty
This is a good point: is the main issue that we feel the interaction is too
chatty, or that it’s too slow? I seem to hear people gravitating toward one or
the other when
Lots of open questions in here, because I think we need a long conversation
on the subject.
On 23 January 2015 at 15:51, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like a change to using internal RPC interfaces would be pretty
unstable at this point.
Can we start by identifying the
On 01/22/2015 06:40 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
I also like the idea of considering the RPC interface. What kind of
stability / versioning exists on the Neutron RPC interface?
Even if Neutron does not have fancy things such as objects with
remotable method, I think its RPC
It seems like a change to using internal RPC interfaces would be pretty
unstable at this point.
Can we start by identifying the shortcomings of the HTTP interface and see
if we can address them before making the jump to using an interface which
has been internal to Neutron so far?
I scanned
On 01/22/2015 10:28 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
Hi,
We have attempted several times to start a conversation around the
interface between nova and neutron and its problems, starting with the
fact that it's chatter than two Italians arguing about football (*).
Indeed the first attempt at
On 22 January 2015 at 17:09, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/22/2015 10:28 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
Hi,
We have attempted several times to start a conversation around the
interface between nova and neutron and its problems, starting with the
fact that it's chatter than two
I can't imagine how MPLS/RSVP is suitable for the communications between
Nova and Neutron. Can you elaborate on what you meant?
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Akilesh K akilesh1...@gmail.com wrote:
I had always wanted this to happen. It is really frustrating when nova
throws wierd python
I had always wanted this to happen. It is really frustrating when nova
throws wierd python exceptions and difficult to comprehend log messages.
If the developers do agree to clean up the interface I would suggest they
make use of some well knows protocol (mpls/rsvp) to do this, instead of
relying
11 matches
Mail list logo
