Le 24/07/2014 02:11, Michael Still a écrit :
> In that case this exception is approved. The exception is in the form
> of another week to get the spec merged, so quick iterations are the
> key.
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
Thanks Michael, greatly appreciated.
-Sylvain
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:31 PM,
In that case this exception is approved. The exception is in the form
of another week to get the spec merged, so quick iterations are the
key.
Cheers,
Michael
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> Le 23/07/2014 01:11, Michael Still a écrit :
>> This spec freeze exception only h
Le 23/07/2014 01:11, Michael Still a écrit :
> This spec freeze exception only has one core signed up. Are there any
> other cores interested in working with Sylvain on this one?
>
> Michael
By looking at
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-juno-spec-priorities, I can see
ndipanov as volunteer f
This spec freeze exception only has one core signed up. Are there any
other cores interested in working with Sylvain on this one?
Michael
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, John Garbutt wrote:
> On 18 July 2014 09:10, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
>> Hi team,
>>
>> I would like to put your attention on ht
On 18 July 2014 09:10, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I would like to put your attention on https://review.openstack.org/89893
> This spec targets to isolate access within the filters to only Scheduler
> bits. This one is a prerequisite for a possible split of the scheduler
> into a separate
