On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:53:11 +
Kenichi Oomichi oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:44 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] v3 API
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 02/20/2014 09:55 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:22:57 -0500
Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
We're also duplicating a lot of test and review energy in having 2 API
stacks. Even before v3 has come out of
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
The v3 API effort has been going for a few release cycles now. As we
approach the Icehouse release, we are faced with the following question:
Is it time to mark v3 stable?
My opinion is that I think we
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:03:31 -0800
Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
1) Discussions about the v2 and v3 APIs at the in-person Nova meetup
last week made me come to the realization that v2 won't be going
away *any* time soon. In some cases, users have long term API
support
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] v3 API in Icehouse
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:36:46 -0500
Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
The v3 API effort has been going for a few release cycles now.
As we approach the Icehouse release, we are faced with the
following question: Is it time
]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:44 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] v3 API in Icehouse
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:36:46 -0500
Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
The v3 API effort has been going for a few release cycles now
I agree that we shouldn't be rushing something that's not ready, but I
guess it raises kind of a meta issue.
When we started this journey this was because v2 has a ton of warts, is
completely wonky on the code internals, which leads to plenty of bugs.
v3 was both a surface clean up, but it was
On 2014年02月20日 10:44, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:36:46 -0500
Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
The v3 API effort has been going for a few release cycles now. As we
approach the Icehouse release, we are faced with the following
question: Is it time to
On 2/19/2014 12:26 PM, Chris Behrens wrote:
+1. I'd like to leave it experimental as well. I think the task work is
important to the future of nova-api and I'd like to make sure we're not rushing
anything. We're going to need to live with old API versions for a long time, so
it's important
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:22:57 -0500
Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
We're also duplicating a lot of test and review energy in having 2 API
stacks. Even before v3 has come out of experimental it's consumed a
huge amount of review resource on both the Nova and Tempest sides to
get it to it's
On 02/20/2014 09:55 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:22:57 -0500
Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
We're also duplicating a lot of test and review energy in having 2 API
stacks. Even before v3 has come out of experimental it's consumed a
huge amount of review resource on
On 20 February 2014 14:55, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:22:57 -0500
Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
We're also duplicating a lot of test and review energy in having 2 API
stacks. Even before v3 has come out of experimental it's consumed a
huge amount of
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:24:22 +
John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
Also micro and extension versioning is not the magic bullet which
will get us out of trouble in the future. Especially with the core
changes. Because even though versioning allows us to make changes,
for similar
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 08:22 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
I agree that we shouldn't be rushing something that's not ready, but I
guess it raises kind of a meta issue.
When we started this journey this was because v2 has a ton of warts, is
completely wonky on the code internals, which leads to
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:44 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] v3 API in Icehouse
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:36:46 -0500
Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote
+1. I'd like to leave it experimental as well. I think the task work is
important to the future of nova-api and I'd like to make sure we're not rushing
anything. We're going to need to live with old API versions for a long time, so
it's important that we get it right. I'm also not convinced
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:36:46 -0500
Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
The v3 API effort has been going for a few release cycles now. As we
approach the Icehouse release, we are faced with the following
question: Is it time to mark v3 stable?
My opinion is that I think
17 matches
Mail list logo
