Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
Hi Mike, Thank you for re-integrating our NFS Cinder driver back in Kilo RC. We appreciate your support. We would like you to re-consider our iSCSI Cinder driver as well. We have some results already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/159856/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166422/ The CI system is up and running and should continuously test and post results from now on. We had network issues so only the CI for NFS driver was reporting, but now we have set up a new infrastructure which will be more stable. We really appreciate you considering ZFSSA iSCSI Cinder driver to be part of Kilo RC. Thank you, Diem. On 04/06/2015 01:43 AM, Mike Perez wrote: On 18:20 Mon 23 Mar , Diem Tran wrote: Hello Cinder team, Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to the list of results the CI already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I kindly request that you accept our CI results and consider re-integrating our drivers back in Kilo RC. If there is any concern, please let us know. Patch is up to revert the removal. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/170770/ Since this CI only covers ZFSSANFSDriver and not also the ZFSSAISCSIDriver, we won't be able to add back in iscsi driver this release. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169283/ http://ec2-54-149-113-183.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com/ci_results/refs-changes-83-169283-1-nfs/logs/etc/cinder/cinder.conf __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
On 18:20 Mon 23 Mar , Diem Tran wrote: Hello Cinder team, Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to the list of results the CI already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I kindly request that you accept our CI results and consider re-integrating our drivers back in Kilo RC. If there is any concern, please let us know. Patch is up to revert the removal. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/170770/ Since this CI only covers ZFSSANFSDriver and not also the ZFSSAISCSIDriver, we won't be able to add back in iscsi driver this release. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169283/ http://ec2-54-149-113-183.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com/ci_results/refs-changes-83-169283-1-nfs/logs/etc/cinder/cinder.conf -- Mike Perez __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
Hi Ramy, Thank you for the insight. I have made the changes, Oracle ZFSSA CI should include testr results in html from now on. Diem. On 03/31/2015 05:39 PM, Asselin, Ramy wrote: Hi Diem, Looking at: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z I don't see any issues, other than missing testr_results.html (nit). You can get that using John's latest code: https://github.com/j-griffith/sos-ci/commit/1aa63782b1745a87c72562edcce19358f9ba79d5 Also, as explained here: http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#requirements, please add your CI contact info here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems +1 Ramy -Original Message- From: Diem Tran [mailto:diem.t...@oracle.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 2:23 PM To: Mike Perez Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org; Alka Deshpande Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS) Hi Mike, This is just a gentle status check from our team: We are aware of the requirements where the CI needs to report in a stable fashion for at least 5 days prior to 4/6/2015. Hence we'd like to know if you and the Cinder team have any issue with the current state of Oracle ZFSSA CI. We want to handle it immediately and stay complied with the requirements. Thank you, Diem. On 03/26/2015 01:28 PM, Diem Tran wrote: Hi Mike, The CI has been adjusted to run 304 tests since 3/24/2015 evening: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Here are examples of recent success runs: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167080/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165763/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166823/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166689/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167366/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166164/ We delayed our response until now because we want to get proofs of success runs and make sure our CI complies with the requirements. We believe it does now. Thank you for your contribution and effort in keeping us updated on this matter. Diem. On 03/24/2015 05:28 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 18:20 Mon 23 Mar , Diem Tran wrote: Hello Cinder team, Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to the list of results the CI already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I kindly request that you accept our CI results and consider re-integrating our drivers back in Kilo RC. If there is any concern, please let us know. Diem, I appreciate your team getting back to us on the CI. It appears your CI is running 247 tests, when it should be running 304. Please verify you're running tempest as followed in the instructions here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#What_t ests_do_I_use.3F Once this issue is resolved, I'll continue to monitor the stability, and based on that make a decision for readding the driver. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
Hi Mike, This is just a gentle status check from our team: We are aware of the requirements where the CI needs to report in a stable fashion for at least 5 days prior to 4/6/2015. Hence we'd like to know if you and the Cinder team have any issue with the current state of Oracle ZFSSA CI. We want to handle it immediately and stay complied with the requirements. Thank you, Diem. On 03/26/2015 01:28 PM, Diem Tran wrote: Hi Mike, The CI has been adjusted to run 304 tests since 3/24/2015 evening: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Here are examples of recent success runs: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167080/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165763/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166823/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166689/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167366/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166164/ We delayed our response until now because we want to get proofs of success runs and make sure our CI complies with the requirements. We believe it does now. Thank you for your contribution and effort in keeping us updated on this matter. Diem. On 03/24/2015 05:28 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 18:20 Mon 23 Mar , Diem Tran wrote: Hello Cinder team, Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to the list of results the CI already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I kindly request that you accept our CI results and consider re-integrating our drivers back in Kilo RC. If there is any concern, please let us know. Diem, I appreciate your team getting back to us on the CI. It appears your CI is running 247 tests, when it should be running 304. Please verify you're running tempest as followed in the instructions here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#What_tests_do_I_use.3F Once this issue is resolved, I'll continue to monitor the stability, and based on that make a decision for readding the driver. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
It looks like you're meeting all of the requirements to me On 1 April 2015 at 00:23, Diem Tran diem.t...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Mike, This is just a gentle status check from our team: We are aware of the requirements where the CI needs to report in a stable fashion for at least 5 days prior to 4/6/2015. Hence we'd like to know if you and the Cinder team have any issue with the current state of Oracle ZFSSA CI. We want to handle it immediately and stay complied with the requirements. Thank you, Diem. On 03/26/2015 01:28 PM, Diem Tran wrote: Hi Mike, The CI has been adjusted to run 304 tests since 3/24/2015 evening: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+ CI%22,n,z Here are examples of recent success runs: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167080/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165763/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166823/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166689/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167366/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166164/ We delayed our response until now because we want to get proofs of success runs and make sure our CI complies with the requirements. We believe it does now. Thank you for your contribution and effort in keeping us updated on this matter. Diem. On 03/24/2015 05:28 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 18:20 Mon 23 Mar , Diem Tran wrote: Hello Cinder team, Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to the list of results the CI already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I kindly request that you accept our CI results and consider re-integrating our drivers back in Kilo RC. If there is any concern, please let us know. Diem, I appreciate your team getting back to us on the CI. It appears your CI is running 247 tests, when it should be running 304. Please verify you're running tempest as followed in the instructions here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty- drivers#What_tests_do_I_use.3F Once this issue is resolved, I'll continue to monitor the stability, and based on that make a decision for readding the driver. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
Hi Mike, The CI has been adjusted to run 304 tests since 3/24/2015 evening: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Here are examples of recent success runs: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167080/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165763/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166823/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166689/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167366/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166164/ We delayed our response until now because we want to get proofs of success runs and make sure our CI complies with the requirements. We believe it does now. Thank you for your contribution and effort in keeping us updated on this matter. Diem. On 03/24/2015 05:28 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 18:20 Mon 23 Mar , Diem Tran wrote: Hello Cinder team, Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to the list of results the CI already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I kindly request that you accept our CI results and consider re-integrating our drivers back in Kilo RC. If there is any concern, please let us know. Diem, I appreciate your team getting back to us on the CI. It appears your CI is running 247 tests, when it should be running 304. Please verify you're running tempest as followed in the instructions here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#What_tests_do_I_use.3F Once this issue is resolved, I'll continue to monitor the stability, and based on that make a decision for readding the driver. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
On 18:20 Mon 23 Mar , Diem Tran wrote: Hello Cinder team, Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to the list of results the CI already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I kindly request that you accept our CI results and consider re-integrating our drivers back in Kilo RC. If there is any concern, please let us know. Diem, I appreciate your team getting back to us on the CI. It appears your CI is running 247 tests, when it should be running 304. Please verify you're running tempest as followed in the instructions here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#What_tests_do_I_use.3F Once this issue is resolved, I'll continue to monitor the stability, and based on that make a decision for readding the driver. -- Mike Perez __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
Hello Cinder team, Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to the list of results the CI already posted: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I kindly request that you accept our CI results and consider re-integrating our drivers back in Kilo RC. If there is any concern, please let us know. Thank you, Diem. Forwarded Message Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:48:37 -0400 From: Alka Deshpande alka.deshpa...@oracle.com To: Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com CC: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org, Fanyaohong fanyaoh...@huawei.com On 3/20/15 2:19 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 12:37 Fri 20 Mar , Alka Deshpande wrote: Hi MIke, My team and I would like to respectfully request a revert for the change at:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165939/ to bring back the ZFSSA drivers to Kilo. Oracle has the CI working internally and we are in the process of going through internal security review, which is expected to be done by the end of March. In the mean time, we have gotten permission to post test results to an external webserver. We will have results reported by the end of the week. If need be, we can show proof of CI running internally by pasting results to pastebin:http://paste.openstack.org/show/193964/ We have been working diligently on setting up the CI system, and we have been keeping you updated since the mid-cycle meetup in Austin. We really appreciate your consideration. We do take CI setup effort very seriously and striving to get it to the level of your satisfaction. The tag for Kilo in Cinder has already happened, so it's too late to revert. We may be able to revisit this in Kilo RC, but I want to see your CI reporting reliably now to then to Cinder reviews. Thanks for the revisit consideration for Kilo RC. My team members will be in touch with you with the CI reporting information, shortly. thanks -Alka FWIW, everyone who was removed told me they were taking it seriously too. Just not serious enough to have CI's reporting by the overly announced deadline. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] [1] -http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-January/054614.html [2] -https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers [3] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-01-21-16.00.log.html [4] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-04-16.04.log.html [5] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-18-16.00.log.html [6] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-25-16.00.log.html [7] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-04-16.00.log.html [8] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-18-16.00.log.html ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
On 12:37 Fri 20 Mar , Alka Deshpande wrote: Hi MIke, My team and I would like to respectfully request a revert for the change at:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165939/ to bring back the ZFSSA drivers to Kilo. Oracle has the CI working internally and we are in the process of going through internal security review, which is expected to be done by the end of March. In the mean time, we have gotten permission to post test results to an external webserver. We will have results reported by the end of the week. If need be, we can show proof of CI running internally by pasting results to pastebin: http://paste.openstack.org/show/193964/ We have been working diligently on setting up the CI system, and we have been keeping you updated since the mid-cycle meetup in Austin. We really appreciate your consideration. We do take CI setup effort very seriously and striving to get it to the level of your satisfaction. The tag for Kilo in Cinder has already happened, so it's too late to revert. We may be able to revisit this in Kilo RC, but I want to see your CI reporting reliably now to then to Cinder reviews. FWIW, everyone who was removed told me they were taking it seriously too. Just not serious enough to have CI's reporting by the overly announced deadline. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] [1] - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-January/054614.html [2] - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers [3] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-01-21-16.00.log.html [4] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-04-16.04.log.html [5] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-18-16.00.log.html [6] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-25-16.00.log.html [7] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-04-16.00.log.html [8] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-18-16.00.log.html -- Mike Perez __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
On 3/20/15 2:19 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 12:37 Fri 20 Mar , Alka Deshpande wrote: Hi MIke, My team and I would like to respectfully request a revert for the change at:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165939/ to bring back the ZFSSA drivers to Kilo. Oracle has the CI working internally and we are in the process of going through internal security review, which is expected to be done by the end of March. In the mean time, we have gotten permission to post test results to an external webserver. We will have results reported by the end of the week. If need be, we can show proof of CI running internally by pasting results to pastebin: http://paste.openstack.org/show/193964/ We have been working diligently on setting up the CI system, and we have been keeping you updated since the mid-cycle meetup in Austin. We really appreciate your consideration. We do take CI setup effort very seriously and striving to get it to the level of your satisfaction. The tag for Kilo in Cinder has already happened, so it's too late to revert. We may be able to revisit this in Kilo RC, but I want to see your CI reporting reliably now to then to Cinder reviews. Thanks for the revisit consideration for Kilo RC. My team members will be in touch with you with the CI reporting information, shortly. thanks -Alka FWIW, everyone who was removed told me they were taking it seriously too. Just not serious enough to have CI's reporting by the overly announced deadline. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] [1] - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-January/054614.html [2] - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers [3] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-01-21-16.00.log.html [4] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-04-16.04.log.html [5] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-18-16.00.log.html [6] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-25-16.00.log.html [7] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-04-16.00.log.html [8] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-18-16.00.log.html __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
