Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [horizon][nova][cinder][keystone][glance][neutron][swift] Horizon feature gaps
Theres also this document with very detailed information: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18ZtWC75BNCwFqLfFpCGGJ9uPVBvUXX0xuXP1yYG0NDA/edit#gid=0 Erlon Em qui, 18 de out de 2018 às 10:30, Jay S Bryant escreveu: > > > On 10/18/2018 7:21 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:41:36AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> On 10/17/2018 9:24 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > >>> As you may know, unfortunately, Horizon doesn't support all features > >>> provided by APIs. That's why we created feature gaps list [1]. > >>> > >>> I'd got a lot of great conversations with projects teams during the PTG > >>> and we tried to figure out what should be done prioritize these tasks. > >>> It's really helpful for Horizon to get feedback from other teams to > >>> understand what features should be implemented next. > >>> > >>> While I'm filling launchpad with new bugs and blueprints for [1], it > >>> would be good to review this list again and find some volunteers to > >>> decrease feature gaps. > >>> > >>> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-feature-gap > >>> > >>> Thanks everybody for any of your contributions to Horizon. > >> +openstack-sigs > >> +openstack-operators > >> > >> I've left some notes for nova. This looks very similar to the compute > API > >> OSC gap analysis I did [1]. Unfortunately it's hard to prioritize what > to > >> really work on without some user/operator feedback - maybe we can get > the > >> user work group involved in trying to help prioritize what people really > >> want that is missing from horizon, at least for compute? > >> > >> [1] > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/compute-api-microversion-gap-in-osc > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Matt > > I also have a cinderclient OSC gap analysis I've started working on. It > might > > be useful to add a Horizon column to this list too. > > > > https://ethercalc.openstack.org/cinderclient-osc-gap > I had forgotten that we had this. I have added it to the persistent > links at the top of our meeting agenda page so we have it for future > reference. Did the same for the Horizon Feature Gaps. Think it would > be good to heave those somewhere that we see them and are reminded about > them. > > Thanks! > Jay > > Sean > > > > > __ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [horizon][nova][cinder][keystone][glance][neutron][swift] Horizon feature gaps
On 10/18/2018 7:21 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:41:36AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 10/17/2018 9:24 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: As you may know, unfortunately, Horizon doesn't support all features provided by APIs. That's why we created feature gaps list [1]. I'd got a lot of great conversations with projects teams during the PTG and we tried to figure out what should be done prioritize these tasks. It's really helpful for Horizon to get feedback from other teams to understand what features should be implemented next. While I'm filling launchpad with new bugs and blueprints for [1], it would be good to review this list again and find some volunteers to decrease feature gaps. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-feature-gap Thanks everybody for any of your contributions to Horizon. +openstack-sigs +openstack-operators I've left some notes for nova. This looks very similar to the compute API OSC gap analysis I did [1]. Unfortunately it's hard to prioritize what to really work on without some user/operator feedback - maybe we can get the user work group involved in trying to help prioritize what people really want that is missing from horizon, at least for compute? [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/compute-api-microversion-gap-in-osc -- Thanks, Matt I also have a cinderclient OSC gap analysis I've started working on. It might be useful to add a Horizon column to this list too. https://ethercalc.openstack.org/cinderclient-osc-gap I had forgotten that we had this. I have added it to the persistent links at the top of our meeting agenda page so we have it for future reference. Did the same for the Horizon Feature Gaps. Think it would be good to heave those somewhere that we see them and are reminded about them. Thanks! Jay Sean __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [horizon][nova][cinder][keystone][glance][neutron][swift] Horizon feature gaps
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:41:36AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 10/17/2018 9:24 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > > > > As you may know, unfortunately, Horizon doesn't support all features > > provided by APIs. That's why we created feature gaps list [1]. > > > > I'd got a lot of great conversations with projects teams during the PTG > > and we tried to figure out what should be done prioritize these tasks. > > It's really helpful for Horizon to get feedback from other teams to > > understand what features should be implemented next. > > > > While I'm filling launchpad with new bugs and blueprints for [1], it > > would be good to review this list again and find some volunteers to > > decrease feature gaps. > > > > [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-feature-gap > > > > Thanks everybody for any of your contributions to Horizon. > > +openstack-sigs > +openstack-operators > > I've left some notes for nova. This looks very similar to the compute API > OSC gap analysis I did [1]. Unfortunately it's hard to prioritize what to > really work on without some user/operator feedback - maybe we can get the > user work group involved in trying to help prioritize what people really > want that is missing from horizon, at least for compute? > > [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/compute-api-microversion-gap-in-osc > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt I also have a cinderclient OSC gap analysis I've started working on. It might be useful to add a Horizon column to this list too. https://ethercalc.openstack.org/cinderclient-osc-gap Sean __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev