On 11/15/2013 11:15 AM, Jason Dunsmore wrote:
Great description of Heat vs. Solum! This belongs in the FAQs of both
projects IMO. This question is bound to keep coming up (for good
reason).
Indeed, Angus' descriptions as well as many of the other folks on this
thread were great and definitel
Great description of Heat vs. Solum! This belongs in the FAQs of both
projects IMO. This question is bound to keep coming up (for good
reason).
On Thu, Nov 14 2013, Angus Salkeld wrote:
> On 14/11/13 13:41 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>So while I have been on vacation, I've been thinking about Solu
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 01:41:22PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
> So while I have been on vacation, I've been thinking about Solum and Heat.
>
> And I have some lingering questions in my mind that make me question
> whether a new server project is actually necessary at all, and
> whether we really shou
On 11/14/2013 11:41 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
So while I have been on vacation, I've been thinking about Solum and
Heat.
And I have some lingering questions in my mind that make me question
whether a new server project is actually necessary at all, and whether
we really should just be targeting in
On 14/11/13 13:41 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
So while I have been on vacation, I've been thinking about Solum and Heat.
And I have some lingering questions in my mind that make me question
whether a new server project is actually necessary at all, and
whether we really should just be targeting in
Hi,
>1) Find all of the applications using PHP 5.4. in their stack and
update them to PHP 5.4.+1
> a) test that the application still works using its built in test suites
> b) if the PHP 5.4.+1 upgrade fails, go back to using PHP 5.4.
for only the affected applications
Actually
Hi,
That's an important question, and I've seen it being asked many times
before, often regarding the Murano project, which also hides Heat templates
under the hood: people were asking why do they need yet another abstraction
layer on top of the familiar and powerful tool such as Heat.
I believe
- Original Message -
> So while I have been on vacation, I've been thinking about Solum and Heat.
>
> And I have some lingering questions in my mind that make me question
> whether a new server project is actually necessary at all, and whether
> we really should just be targeting innovatio
Hi,
I think that Heat is mostly focused on deployment even with new software
configs and convergence. HOT template is quite "static" description of
desired state we want to achieve and it is up to Heat engine how to achieve
this state.
Solum is focused on managing the process of converting source
Hi Jay,
I can say I am still new in Solum team, still reading the extensive
documentation team has created and understanding it. I believe Solum should
be considered an Application project than a server project. I understand it
will be using Heat and HOT to very good extent and there are overlappi
Hi Jay,
I think Heat is an ingredient for Solum. When you build a PaaS, you
need to control the app at different levels:
#1 describing your app (basically your stack)
#2 Pushing your code
#3 Deploying it
#4 Controlling the runtime (restart, get logs, scale, changing
resources allocation, etc...)
Jay,
Thanks for the great question. They really are different.
Heat's mission (correct me if there is a more recent one) is:
"To explicitly model the relationships between OpenStack resources of all
kinds; and to harness those models, expressed in forms accessible to both
humans and machines,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Sam Alba wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> I think Heat is an ingredient for Solum. When you build a PaaS, you
> need to control the app at different levels:
>
> #1 describing your app (basically your stack)
> #2 Pushing your code
> #3 Deploying it
> #4 Controlling the runtim
13 matches
Mail list logo