Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Working group on language packs

2013-12-02 Thread Clayton Coleman
- Original Message - Clayton, good detail documentation of the design approach @ https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/FeatureBlueprints/BuildingSourceIntoDeploymentArtifacts A few questions - 1. On the objective of supporting both heroku build packs and openshift cartridges: how

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Working group on language packs

2013-11-29 Thread Monty Taylor
On 11/25/2013 12:39 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote: Hi, Just for clarification for Windows images, I think Windows image creation is closer to Docker approach. In order to create a special Windows image we use KVM\QEMU VM with initial base image, then install all necessary components,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Working group on language packs

2013-11-25 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
Hi, Just for clarification for Windows images, I think Windows image creation is closer to Docker approach. In order to create a special Windows image we use KVM\QEMU VM with initial base image, then install all necessary components, configure them and then run special tool sysprep to remove all

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Working group on language packs

2013-11-23 Thread Clayton Coleman
On Nov 23, 2013, at 2:37 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Clayton Coleman's message of 2013-11-22 21:43:40 -0800: On Nov 22, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 11/22/2013 11:34 AM, Clayton Coleman wrote: I have updated the language

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Working group on language packs

2013-11-23 Thread Robert Collins
On 24 November 2013 05:42, Clayton Coleman ccole...@redhat.com wrote: Containers will work fine in diskimage-builder. One only needs to hack in the ability to save in the container image format rather than qcow2. That's good to know. Will diskimage-builder be able to break those down into

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Working group on language packs

2013-11-23 Thread Adrian Otto
On Nov 23, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 24 November 2013 05:42, Clayton Coleman ccole...@redhat.com wrote: Containers will work fine in diskimage-builder. One only needs to hack in the ability to save in the container image format rather than qcow2.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Working group on language packs

2013-11-23 Thread Robert Collins
Ok, so no - diskimage-builder builds regular OpenStack full disk disk images. Translating that to a filesystem is easy; doing a diff against another filesystem version is also doable, and if the container service for Nova understands such partial container contents you could certainly glue it all

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Working group on language packs

2013-11-22 Thread Adrian Otto
The breakout meeting schedule poll is published here (dates will be published here once they are selected): https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/BreakoutMeetings#Language_Pack_Working_Group_Series If you would like to join the working group, please: 1) Subscribe to the lang-pack blueprint:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Working group on language packs

2013-11-22 Thread Monty Taylor
On 11/22/2013 11:34 AM, Clayton Coleman wrote: I have updated the language pack (name subject to change) blueprint with the outcomes from the face2face meetings, and drafted a specification that captures the discussion so far. The spec is centered around the core idea of transitioning base

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Working group on language packs

2013-11-22 Thread Clayton Coleman
On Nov 22, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 11/22/2013 11:34 AM, Clayton Coleman wrote: I have updated the language pack (name subject to change) blueprint with the outcomes from the face2face meetings, and drafted a specification that captures the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Working group on language packs

2013-11-22 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Clayton Coleman's message of 2013-11-22 21:43:40 -0800: On Nov 22, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 11/22/2013 11:34 AM, Clayton Coleman wrote: I have updated the language pack (name subject to change) blueprint with the outcomes from