On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 07:40 -0700, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> > On 07/23/2013 07:25 AM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote:
> >> I still think counting lines of code is evil because it might encourage
> >> some developers to write longer code just for statistics.
> >
> > Data becomes
Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> On 07/23/2013 07:25 AM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote:
>> I still think counting lines of code is evil because it might encourage
>> some developers to write longer code just for statistics.
>
> Data becomes evil when you decide to use them for evil purposes :) I
> don't thin
On 07/23/2013 07:25 AM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote:
> I still think counting lines of code is evil because it might encourage
> some developers to write longer code just for statistics.
Data becomes evil when you decide to use them for evil purposes :) I
don't think that lines of code is a bad metr
Thank you Gareth, this makes total sense.
We will make sure to include this in the next release.
Alex Freedland
Mirantis, Inc.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Gareth wrote:
> A suggestion:
>
> sort bugs number as int is much better than string, because '112' < '8'
> but actually 112 > 8
>
A suggestion:
sort bugs number as int is much better than string, because '112' < '8' but
actually 112 > 8
http://stackalytics.com/companies/unitedstack
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Alex Freedland wrote:
> Roman,
>
> Thank you for your comment. I agree that is should not be the only way to
Roman,
Thank you for your comment. I agree that is should not be the only way to
look at the statistics and that is why Stackalytics also measures the
number of contributions and soon will add the number of reviews. I do,
however, think it a useful statistic as because not all commits are created
I still think counting lines of code is evil because it might encourage some
developers to write longer code just for statistics.
On Jul 23, 2013, at 16:58 , Herman Narkaytis wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> Mirantis is pleased to announce the release of Stackalytics 0.1. You can find
> complete
