I was on vacation last week and am late to the discussion, but I'm +1
for the idea.
On 08/19/2014 02:08 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Russell Bryant mailto:rbry...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 08/19/2014 05:31 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
> Hey everybody - https://w
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 08/19/2014 05:31 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
> > Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews
> > seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting.
> >
> > I'd like to propose that we adopt it with t
On 08/19/2014 11:23 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 08/19/2014 05:31 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews
seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting.
I'd like to propose that we adopt it with the following tweak:
19:4
On 08/19/2014 05:31 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
> Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews
> seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting.
>
> I'd like to propose that we adopt it with the following tweak:
>
> 19:46:34 so I propose that +2 on a spec
