Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi OOO'ers, hopefully the subject caught your attentions :) > > Currently, tripleoclient exposes several commands in "openstack baremetal" > and "openstack baremetal introspection" namespaces belonging to ironic and >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On 11/10/2015 05:26 AM, John Trowbridge wrote: > > > On 11/09/2015 07:44 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >> Hi OOO'ers, hopefully the subject caught your attentions :) >> >> Currently, tripleoclient exposes several commands in "openstack >> baremetal" and "openstack baremetal introspection" namespaces

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Brad P. Crochet wrote: > Actually, the 'baremetal' namespace is exactly what it should be, > based on other OSC clients. For instance, Neutron uses 'network', Nova > uses 'server', etc. The idea is that the client should use the service > type,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On 11/10/2015 10:43 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 11/10/2015 05:26 AM, John Trowbridge wrote: >> >> >> On 11/09/2015 07:44 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >>> Hi OOO'ers, hopefully the subject caught your attentions :) >>> >>> Currently, tripleoclient exposes several commands in "openstack >>> baremetal"

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote: > I'm not so sure about the idea that we can't "hijack" other projects > namespaces. If only ironic is allowed to use the prefix "baremetal", > then the prefix should not have been "baremetal" in the first place, > it

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On 11/10/2015 05:18 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: +1 to moving anything we can into Ironic itself. I do want to note that if we rename anything, we can't just rip and replace. We have users of the current commands, and we need to deprecate those to give people a chance to move to the new ones.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote: > These changes are fine to me. > > I'm not so sure about the idea that we can't "hijack" other projects > namespaces. If only ironic is allowed to use the prefix "baremetal", > then the prefix should not have been

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

+1 to moving anything we can into Ironic itself. I do want to note that if we rename anything, we can't just rip and replace. We have users of the current commands, and we need to deprecate those to give people a chance to move to the new ones. A few more thoughts inline. On 11/09/2015 06:44

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On 11/10/2015 11:18 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 11/10/2015 06:08 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: >> On 11/10/2015 10:28 AM, John Trowbridge wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 11/10/2015 10:43 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 11/10/2015 05:26 AM, John Trowbridge wrote: > > > On 11/09/2015 07:44 AM, Dmitry

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On 11/10/2015 10:28 AM, John Trowbridge wrote: > > > On 11/10/2015 10:43 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: >> On 11/10/2015 05:26 AM, John Trowbridge wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 11/09/2015 07:44 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi OOO'ers, hopefully the subject caught your attentions :) Currently,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On 11/10/2015 06:08 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 11/10/2015 10:28 AM, John Trowbridge wrote: On 11/10/2015 10:43 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 11/10/2015 05:26 AM, John Trowbridge wrote: On 11/09/2015 07:44 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi OOO'ers, hopefully the subject caught your attentions :)

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On 09/11/15 07:44, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: As we already have "openstack undercloud" and "openstack overcloud" prefixes for TripleO, I suggest we move these commands under "openstack overcloud nodes" namespace. So we end up with: overcloud nodes import overcloud nodes configure ready state

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On 11/10/2015 10:40 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 11/10/2015 05:18 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: >> +1 to moving anything we can into Ironic itself. >> >> I do want to note that if we rename anything, we can't just rip and >> replace. We have users of the current commands, and we need to >> deprecate

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On 11/09/2015 07:44 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi OOO'ers, hopefully the subject caught your attentions :) > > Currently, tripleoclient exposes several commands in "openstack > baremetal" and "openstack baremetal introspection" namespaces belonging > to ironic and ironic-inspector accordingly.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On 11/10/2015 12:26 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: On 11/09/2015 07:44 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi OOO'ers, hopefully the subject caught your attentions :) Currently, tripleoclient exposes several commands in "openstack baremetal" and "openstack baremetal introspection" namespaces belonging to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On 11/10/2015 02:42 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote: These changes are fine to me. I'm not so sure about the idea that we can't "hijack" other projects namespaces. If only ironic is allowed to use the prefix "baremetal", then the prefix should not have been "baremetal" in the first place, it should

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

- Original Message - > From: "Lennart Regebro" <lrege...@redhat.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 10 November, 2015 1:42:52 PM > Subject: Re

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

These changes are fine to me. I'm not so sure about the idea that we can't "hijack" other projects namespaces. If only ironic is allowed to use the prefix "baremetal", then the prefix should not have been "baremetal" in the first place, it should have been "ironic". Which of course means it would

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On 9 November 2015 at 12:44, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi OOO'ers, hopefully the subject caught your attentions :) > > Currently, tripleoclient exposes several commands in "openstack baremetal" > and "openstack baremetal introspection" namespaces belonging to ironic and >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other projects' OSC namespaces

On 11/09/2015 03:04 PM, Dougal Matthews wrote: On 9 November 2015 at 12:44, Dmitry Tantsur > wrote: Hi OOO'ers, hopefully the subject caught your attentions :) Currently, tripleoclient exposes several commands in "openstack