Excerpts from Dan Prince's message of 2014-07-16 09:50:51 -0700: > Hi TripleO! > > It would appear that we have no coverage in devtest which ensures that > Cinder consistently works in the overcloud. As such the TripleO Cinder > elements are often broken (as of today I can't fully use lio or tgt w/ > upstream TripleO elements). > > How do people feel about swapping out our single 'nova boot' command to > boot from a volume. Something like this: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107437 > > There is a bit of tradeoff here in that the conversion will take a bit > of time (qemu-img has to run). Also our boot code path won't be exactly > the same as booting from an image. > > Long term we want to run Tempest but due to resource constraints we > can't do that today. Until then this sort of deep systems test (running > a command that exercises more code) might serve us well and give us the > Cinder coverage we need. > > Thoughts? >
Tempest is a stretch goal. Given our long test times, until we get them down, I don't know if we can even flirt with tempest other than the most basic smoke tests. So yes, I like the idea of having our one smoke test be as wide as possible. Later on we can add Heat coverage by putting said smoke test into a Heat template. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev