Thanks Tomas and Matthew
I've updated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO#Review_team to have a
link to the new dashboard.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew
http://bit.ly/1lsg3SH now contains the missing projects and has been
re-ordered slightly so that you see outdated reviews first then the
From: Tomas Sedovic [mailto:tsedo...@redhat.com]
Sent: 12 June 2014 19:03
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Reviews - we need your help!
On 12/06/14 16:02, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote:
FWIW, I've tried to make a useful dashboard for this using Sean
Dague's gerrit-dash-creator .
Short URL is http://bit.ly/1l4DLFS long url is:
I'll add it to my fork and submit a PR if people think it useful.
I was about to mention this, too. The gerrit-dash-creator is fantastic.
This one is missing the Tuskar-related projects (openstack/tuskar,
openstack/tuskar-ui and openstack/python-tuskarclient) and also
*From:*James Polley [mailto:j...@jamezpolley.com]
*Sent:* 12 June 2014 06:08
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Reviews - we need your help!
During yesterday's IRC meeting, we realized that our review stats are
starting to slip again.
Just after summit, our stats were starting to improve. In the
2014-05-20 meeting, the TripleO Stats since the last revision
without -1 or -2 looked like this:
1rd quartile wait time: 1 days, 1 hours, 11 minutes
Median wait time: 6 days, 9 hours, 49 minutes
3rd quartile wait time: 13 days, 5 hours, 46 minutes
As of yesterdays meeting, we have:
1rd quartile wait time: 4 days, 23 hours, 19 minutes
Median wait time: 7 days, 22 hours, 8 minutes
3rd quartile wait time: 13 days, 19 hours, 17 minutes
This really hurts our velocity, and is especially hard on people
making their first commit, as it can take them almost a full work week
before they even get their first feedback.
To get things moving, we need everyone to make a special effort to do
a few reviews every day. It would be most helpful if you can look for
older reviews without a -1 or -2 and help those reviews get over the
If you find reviews that are just waiting for a simple fix - typo or
syntax fixes, simple code fixes, or a simple rebase - it would be even
more helpful if you could take a few minutes to make those patches,
rather than just leaving the review waiting for the attention of the
Please keep in mind that these stats are based on all of our projects,
not just tripleo-incubator. To save you heading to the wiki, here's a
handy link that shows you all open code reviews in all our projects:
If you'd prefer the long version: