Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-18 Thread Lance Bragstad
On 07/18/2017 08:21 AM, Andy McCrae wrote: > > > > The branches have now been retired, thanks to Joshua Hesketh! > > > Thanks Josh, Andreas, Tony, and the rest of the Infra crew for sorting > this out. ++ thanks all! > > Andy > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-18 Thread Andy McCrae
> > > > The branches have now been retired, thanks to Joshua Hesketh! > Thanks Josh, Andreas, Tony, and the rest of the Infra crew for sorting this out. Andy __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-18 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-07-17 19:09, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-07-17 15:51, Andy McCrae wrote: >> We held back the openstack-ansible repo to allow us to point to the >> mitaka-eol tag for the other role/project repos. >> That's been done - I've created the mitaka-eol tag in the >> openstack-ansible repo,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-17 Thread Tony Breeds
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 07:09:13PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-07-17 15:51, Andy McCrae wrote: > > We held back the openstack-ansible repo to allow us to point to the > > mitaka-eol tag for the other role/project repos. > > That's been done - I've created the mitaka-eol tag in the > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-17 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-07-17 15:51, Andy McCrae wrote: > We held back the openstack-ansible repo to allow us to point to the > mitaka-eol tag for the other role/project repos. > That's been done - I've created the mitaka-eol tag in the > openstack-ansible repo, can we remove the stable/mitaka branch from >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-17 Thread Andy McCrae
Hi Andreas, OK, added. I'm waiting for packstack confirmation. > > The current list is now: > > > openstack/sahara-extra stable/icehousePlease retire > openstack/sahara-extra stable/mitaka Please retire > openstack/packstack stable/kiloWaiting for

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-11 Thread Tony Breeds
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:33:51AM +, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Will this also be moving to eol - > https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/stable/mitaka/global-requirements.txt? We need to be very careful EOLing that repo (if at all) as project have deep links to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-10 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-07-10 13:33, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Will this also be moving to eol - > https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/stable/mitaka/global-requirements.txt? No, not planned yet, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-10 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, Will this also be moving to eol - https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/stable/mitaka/global-requirements.txt? Thanks Gary On 7/10/17, 9:23 AM, "Andreas Jaeger" wrote: On 2017-07-07 17:37, Doug Szumski wrote: > >> On 2017-07-05 12:13, Joshua Hesketh

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-10 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-07-07 17:37, Doug Szumski wrote: > >> On 2017-07-05 12:13, Joshua Hesketh wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Very sorry for the delay on processing this request. I have now EOL'd >>> stable/mitaka branches for projects listed in [1]. >>> >>> If there are any mistakes it should be possible to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-07 Thread Doug Szumski
> On 2017-07-05 12:13, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Very sorry for the delay on processing this request. I have now EOL'd > > stable/mitaka branches for projects listed in [1]. > > > > If there are any mistakes it should be possible to restore the branch > > at the correct

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-06 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-07-05 12:13, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > Hi all, > > Very sorry for the delay on processing this request. I have now EOL'd > stable/mitaka branches for projects listed in [1]. > > If there are any mistakes it should be possible to restore the branch at > the correct position. Similarly

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-06 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-07-05 12:13, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > Hi all, > > Very sorry for the delay on processing this request. I have now EOL'd > stable/mitaka branches for projects listed in [1]. > > If there are any mistakes it should be possible to restore the branch at > the correct position. Similarly

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-05 Thread Joshua Hesketh
Hi all, Very sorry for the delay on processing this request. I have now EOL'd stable/mitaka branches for projects listed in [1]. If there are any mistakes it should be possible to restore the branch at the correct position. Similarly please let me know if there were any projects that should have

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-29 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-06-29 11:28:10 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: [...] > In the meantime we could look at adding permissions such that the Stable > PTL (Well actually I guess eventually it'd be the same bot that does the > release tagging) can push tags and abandon changes on all projects. > > Right now

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-28 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:50:34PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > Indeed, that's a bummer. I hadn't noticed it until you pointed it > out and assumed it had made it into the 2.13 series. Well, we're > planning to look at logistics for a 2.14 upgrade soon once 2.13 is > (hopefully!) in production,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-28 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-06-28 13:21:46 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 08:59:27PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > Fingers crossed that we'll be able to switch to Gerrit 2.13 soon and > > resume that much needed development effort. > > This looks to have landed in 2.14[1] :( I

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-27 Thread Joshua Hesketh
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-06-17 01:20:28 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote: > [...] > > I'm happy to help do this if you'd like. Otherwise the script I've > > used for the last few retirements is here: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-27 Thread Tony Breeds
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 08:59:27PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > Fingers crossed that we'll be able to switch to Gerrit 2.13 soon and > resume that much needed development effort. This looks to have landed in 2.14[1] :( I don't know how hard it'd be to backport to 2.13 or even if that's a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-27 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-06-17 01:20:28 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote: [...] > I'm happy to help do this if you'd like. Otherwise the script I've > used for the last few retirements is here: > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/tree/eol_branch.sh That would be really appreciated if

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-18 Thread Tony Breeds
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:14:59PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-06-16 15:12:36 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: > [...] > > It seeems a little odd to be following up so long after I first started > > this thread but can someone on infra please process the EOLs as > > described in

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-16 Thread Joshua Hesketh
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-06-16 15:12:36 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: > [...] > > It seeems a little odd to be following up so long after I first started > > this thread but can someone on infra please process the EOLs as > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-16 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-06-16 15:12:36 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: [...] > It seeems a little odd to be following up so long after I first started > this thread but can someone on infra please process the EOLs as > described in [1]. [...] I thought in prior discussions it had been determined that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-15 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:47:25PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi all, > I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several projects > have already requested EOL releases to make it trivial and obvious where to > apply the tag. > > I'm proposing to EOL all projects that meet

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-28 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> I'm late in sending this announement, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-24 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: >> Hi all, >> I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several >> projects >> have already requested EOL releases to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-17 Thread Tony Breeds
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 09:55:51AM -0400, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > On 4/12/17 2:47 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several > > projects > > have already requested EOL releases to make it trivial and obvious where to > > apply the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-17 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi all, > I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several projects > have already requested EOL releases to make it trivial and obvious where to > apply the tag. > > I'm proposing to EOL all

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-17 Thread Brian Rosmaita
On 4/12/17 2:47 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi all, > I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several projects > have already requested EOL releases to make it trivial and obvious where to > apply the tag. > > I'm proposing to EOL all projects ... Hi Tony, just wanted to give

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-14 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 04:58:12PM -0700, Samuel Cassiba wrote: > Hi Tony, > > I’m not the PTL, but I asked in our channel. You can EOL Chef OpenStack as > well. Thanks! Cool. I've added the Chef repos to the EOL list. Yours Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-13 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 04:48:34PM -0700, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: > Hi Tony, Kindly do not EOL openstack/group-based-policy, we are > maintaining this branch. Done. Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature __

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-13 Thread Samuel Cassiba
Hi Tony, I’m not the PTL, but I asked in our channel. You can EOL Chef OpenStack as well. Thanks! -- Best, Samuel Cassiba signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-13 Thread Sumit Naiksatam
Hi Tony, Kindly do not EOL openstack/group-based-policy, we are maintaining this branch. Thanks, ~Sumit. On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 08:20:50AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > >> I would not include puppet-midonet without

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-13 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 08:20:50AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > I would not include puppet-midonet without verification from those > devs. I believe it is still in use. Okay I'll leave them in the NOT EOLing list. I assumed that puppet-midonet would just plain fail once there wasn't a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-13 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 03:55:56PM +0100, Andy McCrae wrote: > Can the openstack-ansible repository be skipped until other repo's are > EOL'd, please? The reason is that we'd like the mitaka-eol tag for OSA to > point to the mitaka-eol tag of the appropriate upstream projects, in order > for that

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-13 Thread Andy McCrae
Hi Tony, > Please look over both lists by 2017-04-17 00:00 UTC and let me know if: > - A project is in list 1 and *really* *really* wants to opt *OUT* of > EOLing and > why. Note doing this will amost certainly reduce the testing coverage > you > have in the gate. > - A project is in list 2

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-13 Thread Alex Schultz
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 07:53:17AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > >> Please EOL the Puppet OpenStack projects that have the stable/mitaka branch. > > Thanks Alex! I've added: > openstack/puppet-aodh >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-12 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:27:22PM +, gordon chung wrote: > i imagine you can EOL python-aodhclient and ceilometermiddleware. thanks Thanks I've added those repos/projects. Yours Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-12 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:06:36PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Please add openstack-manuals to the list for EOL, Thanks Added! Yours Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-12 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 07:53:17AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > Please EOL the Puppet OpenStack projects that have the stable/mitaka branch. Thanks Alex! I've added: openstack/puppet-aodh openstack/puppet-ceilometer openstack/puppet-cinder openstack/puppet-designate openstack/puppet-glance

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-12 Thread gordon chung
On 12/04/17 02:47 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Please look over both lists by 2017-04-17 00:00 UTC and let me know if: > - A project is in list 1 and *really* *really* wants to opt *OUT* of EOLing > and > why. Note doing this will amost certainly reduce the testing coverage you > have in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-12 Thread Andreas Jaeger
Please add openstack-manuals to the list for EOL, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-12 Thread Alex Schultz
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi all, > I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several projects > have already requested EOL releases to make it trivial and obvious where to > apply the tag. > > I'm proposing to EOL all