> Right, agreed. This has always been an open meeting.
Yes of course, as I said up-thread.
This is a central plank of our "4 Opens" principle[1], which should
apply across the board to all community meetings related to the
OpenStack project.
"All project meetings are held in public IRC channel
On 11/21/2014 04:58 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>> +1 to involving the liaisons more directly
>>
>> -1 to the meeting size growing too large for productive real-time
>>communication on IRC
>>
>> IME, there's a practical limit on the number of *active* participants
>> in an I
Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> +1 to involving the liaisons more directly
>
> -1 to the meeting size growing too large for productive real-time
>communication on IRC
>
> IME, there's a practical limit on the number of *active* participants
> in an IRC meeting. Not sure what that magic threshold is, bu
On 20/11/14 09:04 -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 11/20/2014 08:55 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
This is mostly a cosmetic change: update the messaging around that
meeting to make it more obvious that it's not purely about the
integrated release and that it is appropriate to put other types of
cross
On Nov 20, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> TL;DR:
>> I propose we turn the "weekly project/release meeting" timeslot
>> (Tuesdays at 21:00 UTC) into a "weekly cross-project meeting", to
>> discuss cross-project topics with all the project leadership, rather
>> t
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 11/20/2014 09:04 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> On 11/20/2014 08:55 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>>> This is mostly a cosmetic change: update the messaging around that
>>> meeting to make it more obvious that it's not purely about the
>>> integrat
> Hi everyone,
>
> TL;DR:
> I propose we turn the "weekly project/release meeting" timeslot
> (Tuesdays at 21:00 UTC) into a "weekly cross-project meeting", to
> discuss cross-project topics with all the project leadership, rather
> than keep it release-specific.
>
>
> Long version:
>
> Since
On Thursday, November 20, 2014, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 11/20/2014 09:04 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> > On 11/20/2014 08:55 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> >> This is mostly a cosmetic change: update the messaging around that
> >> meeting to make it more obvious that it's not purely about the
> >> inte
On 11/20/2014 09:04 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 11/20/2014 08:55 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> This is mostly a cosmetic change: update the messaging around that
>> meeting to make it more obvious that it's not purely about the
>> integrated release and that it is appropriate to put other types o
On 11/20/2014 08:55 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> This is mostly a cosmetic change: update the messaging around that
> meeting to make it more obvious that it's not purely about the
> integrated release and that it is appropriate to put other types of
> cross-project issues on the agenda. Let me know
10 matches
Mail list logo
