Re: [openstack-dev] [architecture] Arch-WG, we hardly knew ye..

2017-04-07 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from lebre.adrien's message of 2017-04-07 15:50:05 +0200: > Dear Clint, Dear all, > > It is indeed unfortunate that the WG ends. > > From our side (Inria folks from the Discovery initiative [1]), we had planned > to join the effort after the Boston Summit as we are currently addressing

Re: [openstack-dev] [architecture] Arch-WG, we hardly knew ye..

2017-04-07 Thread Joshua Harlow
Sad to see it go, but I understand the reasoning about why. Back to the coal mines :-P -Josh Clint Byrum wrote: I'm going to be blunt. I'm folding the Architecture Working Group immediately following our meeting today at 2000 UTC. We'll be using the time to discuss continuity of the base-servi

Re: [openstack-dev] [architecture] Arch-WG, we hardly knew ye..

2017-04-07 Thread lebre . adrien
Dear Clint, Dear all, It is indeed unfortunate that the WG ends. From our side (Inria folks from the Discovery initiative [1]), we had planned to join the effort after the Boston Summit as we are currently addressing two points that are/were closely related to the Arch WG (at least from our u

Re: [openstack-dev] [architecture] Arch-WG, we hardly knew ye..

2017-04-07 Thread Thierry Carrez
Clint Byrum wrote: > I'm going to be blunt. I'm folding the Architecture Working Group > immediately following our meeting today at 2000 UTC. We'll be using the > time to discuss continuity of the base-services proposal, and any other > draw-down necessary. After that our meetings will cease. > >