Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Bug#1231298 - size parameter for volume creation

2014-08-12 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 11 August 2014 21:03, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Making an previously mandatory parameter optional, at least on the command line, does break backward compatibility though, does it? Everything that

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Bug#1231298 - size parameter for volume creation

2014-08-11 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 8 August 2014 07:55, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote: In cinderclient I think you're stuck with size as a mandatory argument to the 'cinder create' command, as you must be backward-compatible for at least a deprecation period.[0] Making an previously mandatory parameter optional, at

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Bug#1231298 - size parameter for volume creation

2014-08-11 Thread Dean Troyer
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Making an previously mandatory parameter optional, at least on the command line, does break backward compatibility though, does it? Everything that worked before will still work. By itself, maybe that is ok.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Bug#1231298 - size parameter for volume creation

2014-08-08 Thread Dean Troyer
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Ganapathy, Sandhya sandhya.ganapa...@hp.com wrote: This is to discuss Bug #1231298 – https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1231298 ... Conclusion reached with this bug is that, we need to modify cinder client in order to accept optional size parameter (as

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Bug#1231298 - size parameter for volume creation

2014-08-08 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Aug 8, 2014, at 6:55 AM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Ganapathy, Sandhya sandhya.ganapa...@hp.com wrote: This is to discuss Bug #1231298 – https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1231298 ... Conclusion reached with this bug is that, we need