Hi all,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1255622
For this bug, I have added some comments to explain why the orphaned
volume that ends up in the end of the migration.
@John Griffith, I hope this can resolve your confusion a bit.
Best wishes,
Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
Staff Software Engineer,
:Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] volume replication
--
Hi Ronen,
Xingyang mentioned there's another etherpad on rep and CG, which etherpad
should we mainly follow ?
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Ronen Kat *ronen...@il.ibm.com*
ronen...@il.ibm.com wrote
Hi Ronen,
Xingyang mentioned there's another etherpad on rep and CG, which etherpad
should we mainly follow ?
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Ronen Kat ronen...@il.ibm.com wrote:
Ruijing, hi,
Are you discussing the network/fabric between Storage A and Storage B?
If so, assumption in Cinder
.
-- Ronen
From:
Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com
To:
OpenStack Development
Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date:
16/02/2015 09:14 AM
Subject:
Re: [openstack-dev]
[cinder] volume replication
Hi Ronen,
Xingyang mentioned there's another
