Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-16 Thread Sean Roberts
I'm good for either time Tuesday. 

~sean

 On Feb 16, 2015, at 15:45, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
 
 Lets default to 3p/7a if we don't hear from Bryan.
 
 Tim
 
 P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile. 
 
 On Feb 15, 2015, at 10:15 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 2 - 4 pm Tuesday (which means 6 - 8 am China Wed) should work for me. Let's 
 see if Bryan is ok with the time slot. And yes you don't need an account :)
 
 On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
 I just realized Monday is a holiday. What about 8a, 10a, 2-4p Tuesday?
 
 I'm happy to try out gotomeeting.  Looks like I don't need an account, 
 right?
 
 Tim
 
 P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile. 
 
 On Feb 13, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi Tim,
 
 Monday 9am PST should be ok for me, it is better if u guys could do 4 - 5 
 pm, but let's settle on 9 am for now, see if Bryan and others would be ok. 
 Regarding meeting tools, in opnfv we use GoToMeeting a lot, would u guys 
 be ok with that? Or should we have a Google Hangout?
 
 On Feb 14, 2015 8:04 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
 Hi Zhipeng,
 
 Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue.  If you come up with some times the 
 Copper team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress 
 team.  We’re usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks 
 better than Tuesday.
 
 If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p, 
 I’ll do my best to make it there.  Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always 
 have Sean to talk with.
 
 Tim
 
 
 
 
 On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 THX Tim!
 
 I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of 
 F2F LFC summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or 
 Tuesday), and then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they 
 met, with specific questions. 
 
 Would this be ok for everyone ? 
 
 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com 
 wrote:
 Bryan and Zhipeng,
 
 Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa.   Sean’s 
 definitely there on Wed.  Less clear about Thu/Fri.
 
 I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early 
 afternoon if I can.  
 
 Tim
 
 
 On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote:
 
 Hi Tim,
 
  
 It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if 
 possible at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic 
 understanding of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to 
 demo at the meetup. The goal is to assess the current state of 
 Congress support for the use cases on the OPNFV wiki: 
 https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases
 
  
 I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready 
 with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and 
 the other policy-related projects
 
 (fault management, resource management, resource scheduler) with 
 Congress experts would be great.
 
  
 Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, 
 the goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new 
 work in Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly 
 involved in Congress to address them, or start a collaborative 
 development project in OPNFV for that. TBD
 
  
 Thanks,
 
 Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT
 
  
 From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com] 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration 
 between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper
 
  
 
 Hi Zhipeng,
 
  
 
 We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!  
 
  
 
 I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend 
 the LF collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of 
 people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  
 Otherwise, there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto.  And of 
 course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well.
 
  
 
 Tim
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
  
 
 Hi Congress Team,
 
  
 
 As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering 
 deployment policy called  Copper, in which we identify Congress as one 
 of the upstream projects that we need to put our requirement to. Our 
 team has been working on setting up a simple openstack environment 
 with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases for policy 
 deployment.
 
  
 
 Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an 
 Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could 
 introduce how to best integrate congress with vanilla openstack? 
 Will some of you attend LF Collaboration Summit?
 
  
 
 Thanks a lot

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-16 Thread Zhipeng Huang
 might also just find some bugs and get directly involved 
 in
 Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in
 OPNFV for that. TBD


 Thanks,

 Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT


 *From:* Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com
 thinri...@vmware.com]
 *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
 *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 *Cc:* SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
 *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev]
 [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and
 OPNFV Copper



 Hi Zhipeng,



 We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!



 I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend
 the LF collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of
 people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise,
 there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course,
 phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well.



 Tim







 On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com
 wrote:



 Hi Congress Team,



 As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering
 deployment policy called Copper
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=,
 in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need
 to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a 
 simple
 openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use
 cases for policy deployment.



 Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an
 Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could
 introduce how to best integrate congress with vanilla openstack? Will
 some of you attend LF Collaboration Summit?



 Thanks a lot :)



 --

 Zhipeng (Howard) Huang



 Standard Engineer

 IT Standard  Patent/IT Prooduct Line

 Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd

 Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com

 Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen



 (Previous)

 Research Assistant

 Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2

 University of California, Irvine

 Email: zhipe...@uci.edu

 Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402



 OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado


 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
 ?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev






 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




  --
  Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

  Standard Engineer
 IT Standard  Patent/IT Prooduct Line
 Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
 Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
 Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

  (Previous)
 Research Assistant
 Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
 University of California, Irvine
 Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
 Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

  OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado

 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
 ?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
 ?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




  --
   Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

  Standard Engineer
 IT Standard  Patent/IT Prooduct Line
 Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
 Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
 Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

  (Previous)
 Research Assistant
 Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
 University of California, Irvine
 Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
 Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-15 Thread Zhipeng Huang
2 - 4 pm Tuesday (which means 6 - 8 am China Wed) should work for me. Let's
see if Bryan is ok with the time slot. And yes you don't need an account :)

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote:

  I just realized Monday is a holiday. What about 8a, 10a, 2-4p Tuesday?

  I'm happy to try out gotomeeting.  Looks like I don't need an account,
 right?

 Tim

  P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile.

 On Feb 13, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:

   Hi Tim,

 Monday 9am PST should be ok for me, it is better if u guys could do 4 - 5
 pm, but let's settle on 9 am for now, see if Bryan and others would be ok.
 Regarding meeting tools, in opnfv we use GoToMeeting a lot, would u guys be
 ok with that? Or should we have a Google Hangout?
 On Feb 14, 2015 8:04 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote:

 Hi Zhipeng,

  Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue.  If you come up with some times the
 Copper team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress team.
 We’re usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks better than
 Tuesday.

  If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p,
 I’ll do my best to make it there.  Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always
 have Sean to talk with.

  Tim




  On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  THX Tim!

  I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of
 F2F LFC summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or
 Tuesday), and then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met,
 with specific questions.

  Would this be ok for everyone ?

 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com
 wrote:

 Bryan and Zhipeng,

  Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa.   Sean’s
 definitely there on Wed.  Less clear about Thu/Fri.

  I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early
 afternoon if I can.

  Tim


  On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote:

   Hi Tim,


 It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if
 possible at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic
 understanding of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at
 the meetup. The goal is to assess the current state of Congress support for
 the use cases on the OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcasesd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VUe=


 I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready
 with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the
 other policy-related projects

 (fault management
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctord=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvUe=,
 resource management
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promised=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30e=,
 resource scheduler
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fschedulerd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9Ie=)
 with Congress experts would be great.


 Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the
 goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in
 Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in
 Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in
 OPNFV for that. TBD


 Thanks,

 Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT


 *From:* Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com thinri...@vmware.com]

 *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
 *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 *Cc:* SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
 *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration
 between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper



 Hi Zhipeng,



 We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!



 I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend
 the LF collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of
 people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise,
 there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course,
 phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well.



 Tim

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-15 Thread Tim Hinrichs
I just realized Monday is a holiday. What about 8a, 10a, 2-4p Tuesday?

I'm happy to try out gotomeeting.  Looks like I don't need an account, right?

Tim

P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile.

On Feb 13, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Zhipeng Huang 
zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:


Hi Tim,

Monday 9am PST should be ok for me, it is better if u guys could do 4 - 5 pm, 
but let's settle on 9 am for now, see if Bryan and others would be ok. 
Regarding meeting tools, in opnfv we use GoToMeeting a lot, would u guys be ok 
with that? Or should we have a Google Hangout?

On Feb 14, 2015 8:04 AM, Tim Hinrichs 
thinri...@vmware.commailto:thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi Zhipeng,

Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue.  If you come up with some times the Copper 
team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress team.  We’re 
usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks better than Tuesday.

If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p, I’ll do 
my best to make it there.  Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always have Sean to 
talk with.

Tim




On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang 
zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:

THX Tim!

I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of F2F LFC 
summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or Tuesday), and 
then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met, with specific 
questions.

Would this be ok for everyone ?

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs 
thinri...@vmware.commailto:thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
Bryan and Zhipeng,

Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa.   Sean’s definitely there 
on Wed.  Less clear about Thu/Fri.

I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early afternoon if 
I can.

Tim


On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L 
bs3...@att.commailto:bs3...@att.com wrote:

Hi Tim,

It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at 
our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of 
Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal 
is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the 
OPNFV wiki: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_caseshttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcasesd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VUe=

I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready with it. 
So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other 
policy-related projects
(fault 
managementhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctord=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvUe=,
 resource 
managementhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promised=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30e=,
 resource 
schedulerhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fschedulerd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9Ie=)
 with Congress experts would be great.

Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal 
for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. 
We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to 
address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. 
TBD

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT

From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between 
OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Hi Zhipeng,

We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!

I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF 
collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s 
the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise, there are a bunch of 
us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine 
options as well.

Tim



On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Congress Team,

As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-13 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Hi Zhipeng,

Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue.  If you come up with some times the Copper 
team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress team.  We’re 
usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks better than Tuesday.

If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p, I’ll do 
my best to make it there.  Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always have Sean to 
talk with.

Tim




On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang 
zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:

THX Tim!

I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of F2F LFC 
summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or Tuesday), and 
then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met, with specific 
questions.

Would this be ok for everyone ?

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs 
thinri...@vmware.commailto:thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
Bryan and Zhipeng,

Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa.   Sean’s definitely there 
on Wed.  Less clear about Thu/Fri.

I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early afternoon if 
I can.

Tim


On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L 
bs3...@att.commailto:bs3...@att.com wrote:

Hi Tim,

It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at 
our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of 
Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal 
is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the 
OPNFV wiki: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_caseshttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcasesd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VUe=

I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready with it. 
So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other 
policy-related projects
(fault 
managementhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctord=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvUe=,
 resource 
managementhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promised=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30e=,
 resource 
schedulerhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fschedulerd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9Ie=)
 with Congress experts would be great.

Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal 
for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. 
We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to 
address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. 
TBD

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT

From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between 
OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Hi Zhipeng,

We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!

I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF 
collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s 
the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise, there are a bunch of 
us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine 
options as well.

Tim



On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Congress Team,

As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy 
called 
Copperhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=,
 in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to 
put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple 
openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases 
for policy deployment.

Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an 
Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce 
how

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-13 Thread Zhipeng Huang
Hi Tim,

Monday 9am PST should be ok for me, it is better if u guys could do 4 - 5
pm, but let's settle on 9 am for now, see if Bryan and others would be ok.
Regarding meeting tools, in opnfv we use GoToMeeting a lot, would u guys be
ok with that? Or should we have a Google Hangout?
On Feb 14, 2015 8:04 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote:

  Hi Zhipeng,

  Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue.  If you come up with some times the
 Copper team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress team.
 We’re usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks better than
 Tuesday.

  If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p,
 I’ll do my best to make it there.  Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always
 have Sean to talk with.

  Tim




  On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:

  THX Tim!

  I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of
 F2F LFC summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or
 Tuesday), and then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met,
 with specific questions.

  Would this be ok for everyone ?

 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com
 wrote:

 Bryan and Zhipeng,

  Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa.   Sean’s
 definitely there on Wed.  Less clear about Thu/Fri.

  I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early
 afternoon if I can.

  Tim


  On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote:

   Hi Tim,


 It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if
 possible at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic
 understanding of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at
 the meetup. The goal is to assess the current state of Congress support for
 the use cases on the OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcasesd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VUe=


 I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready
 with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the
 other policy-related projects

 (fault management
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctord=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvUe=,
 resource management
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promised=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30e=,
 resource scheduler
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fschedulerd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9Ie=)
 with Congress experts would be great.


 Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the
 goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in
 Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in
 Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in
 OPNFV for that. TBD


 Thanks,

 Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT


 *From:* Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com thinri...@vmware.com]

 *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
 *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 *Cc:* SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
 *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration
 between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper



 Hi Zhipeng,



 We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!



 I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the
 LF collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of people
 if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise, there are
 a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course, phone/google
 hangout/irc are fine options as well.



 Tim







 On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:



 Hi Congress Team,



 As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment
 policy called Copper
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=,
 in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-12 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Bryan and Zhipeng,

Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa.   Sean’s definitely there 
on Wed.  Less clear about Thu/Fri.

I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early afternoon if 
I can.

Tim

On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L 
bs3...@att.commailto:bs3...@att.com wrote:

Hi Tim,

It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at 
our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of 
Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal 
is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the 
OPNFV wiki: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_caseshttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcasesd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VUe=

I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready with it. 
So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other 
policy-related projects
(fault 
managementhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctord=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvUe=,
 resource 
managementhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promised=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30e=,
 resource 
schedulerhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fschedulerd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9Ie=)
 with Congress experts would be great.

Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal 
for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. 
We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to 
address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. 
TBD

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT

From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between 
OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Hi Zhipeng,

We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!

I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF 
collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s 
the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise, there are a bunch of 
us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine 
options as well.

Tim



On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Congress Team,

As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy 
called 
Copperhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=,
 in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to 
put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple 
openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases 
for policy deployment.

Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an 
Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce 
how to best integrate congress with vanilla openstack? Will some of you 
attend LF Collaboration Summit?

Thanks a lot :)

--
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard  Patent/IT Prooduct Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.commailto:huangzhip...@huawei.com
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Email: zhipe...@uci.edumailto:zhipe...@uci.edu
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-12 Thread Zhipeng Huang
THX Tim!

I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of F2F
LFC summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or
Tuesday), and then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met,
with specific questions.

Would this be ok for everyone ?

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote:

  Bryan and Zhipeng,

  Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa.   Sean’s definitely
 there on Wed.  Less clear about Thu/Fri.

  I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early
 afternoon if I can.

  Tim


  On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote:

   Hi Tim,



 It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible
 at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding
 of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup.
 The goal is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use
 cases on the OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcasesd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VUe=



 I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready
 with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the
 other policy-related projects

 (fault management
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctord=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvUe=,
 resource management
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promised=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30e=,
 resource scheduler
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fschedulerd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9Ie=)
 with Congress experts would be great.



 Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the
 goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in
 Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in
 Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in
 OPNFV for that. TBD



 Thanks,

 Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT



 *From:* Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com thinri...@vmware.com]
 *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
 *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 *Cc:* SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
 *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration
 between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper



 Hi Zhipeng,



 We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!



 I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the
 LF collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of people
 if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise, there are
 a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course, phone/google
 hangout/irc are fine options as well.



 Tim







 On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:



 Hi Congress Team,



 As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment
 policy called Copper
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=,
 in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need
 to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple
 openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use
 cases for policy deployment.



 Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an
 Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could
 introduce how to best integrate congress with vanilla openstack? Will
 some of you attend LF Collaboration Summit?



 Thanks a lot :)



 --

 Zhipeng (Howard) Huang



 Standard Engineer

 IT Standard  Patent/IT Prooduct Line

 Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd

 Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com

 Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen



 (Previous)

 Research Assistant

 Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2

 University of California, Irvine

 Email: zhipe...@uci.edu

 Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402



 OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-11 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Hi Zhipeng,

We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!

I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF 
collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s 
the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise, there are a bunch of 
us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine 
options as well.

Tim



On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Congress Team,

As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy 
called 
Copperhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=,
 in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to 
put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple 
openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases 
for policy deployment.

Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an 
Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce 
how to best integrate congress with vanilla openstack? Will some of you 
attend LF Collaboration Summit?

Thanks a lot :)

--
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard  Patent/IT Prooduct Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.commailto:huangzhip...@huawei.com
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Email: zhipe...@uci.edumailto:zhipe...@uci.edu
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-11 Thread Zhipeng Huang
Hi Tim,

Thanks for the quick reply!I also think we should probably have a google
hangout or irc meeting ahead of F2F, do you guys have time before 2/17,
let's have a short session of crash course : )

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote:

  Hi Zhipeng,

  We’d be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!

  I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend
 the LF collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of
 people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise,
 there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course,
 phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well.

  Tim



   On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Hi Congress Team,

  As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment
 policy called Copper
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=,
 in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need
 to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple
 openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use
 cases for policy deployment.

  Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an
 Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could
 introduce how to best integrate congress with vanilla openstack? Will
 some of you attend LF Collaboration Summit?

  Thanks a lot :)

  --
  Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

  Standard Engineer
 IT Standard  Patent/IT Prooduct Line
 Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
 Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
 Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

  (Previous)
 Research Assistant
 Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
 University of California, Irvine
 Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
 Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

  OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado

 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




-- 
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard  Patent/IT Prooduct Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Email: zhipe...@uci.edu
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-11 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Hi Tim,

See one issue I had when installing congress, below. I'm not sure where to 
report this as it seems just a bug in the readme.rst at 
https://github.com/stackforge/congresshttps://github.com/stackforge/congress%20and%20in%20the%20prepare_devstack.sh
 and in the prepare_devstack.sh script.

The readme references creating a localrc and adding the line below to it:
ENABLED_SERVICES=congress,g-api,g-reg,key,n-api,n-crt,n-obj,n-cpu,n-sch,n-cauth,horizon,mysql,rabbit,sysstat,cinder,c-api,c-vol,c-sch,n-cond,quantum,q-svc,q-agt,q-dhcp,q-l3,q-meta,n-novnc,n-xvnc,q-lbaas,ceilometer-acompute,ceilometer-acentral,ceilometer-anotification,ceilometer-collector,ceilometer-alarm-evaluator,ceilometer-alarm-notifier,ceilometer-api,s-proxy,s-object,s-container,s-account

But localrc has been deprecated for local.conf AFAICT, and stack.sh failed with 
errors (urllib3:... connection pool is full, discarding connection...) until I:
-  Moved enable_service congress into the [local|localrc] section 
of local.conf
-  Did not include the ENABLED_SERVICES line above
(it seems to be redundant, not necessary if you are only enabling the default 
services, and I think caused the errors in stack.sh)

I think prepare_devstack.sh needs to be updated to put enable_service 
congress into the [local|localrc] section of local.conf rather than creating 
localrc (at least when there is a local.conf in the devstack directory).

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT

From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 9:04 PM
To: 'Tim Hinrichs'; 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage 
questions)'
Cc: HU, BIN; 'Rodriguez, Iben'; 'Howard Huang'
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between 
OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Hi Tim,

It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at 
our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of 
Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal 
is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the 
OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases

I would be doing the same with ODL but I'm not as far on getting ready with it. 
So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other 
policy-related projects
(fault managementhttps://wiki.opnfv.org/doctor, resource 
managementhttps://wiki.opnfv.org/promise, resource 
schedulerhttps://wiki.opnfv.org/requirements_projects/resource_scheduler) 
with Congress experts would be great.

Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal 
for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. 
We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to 
address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. 
TBD

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT

From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between 
OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Hi Zhipeng,

We'd be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!

I don't know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF 
collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of people if it's 
the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise, there are a bunch of 
us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine 
options as well.

Tim



On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Congress Team,

As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy 
called 
Copperhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=,
 in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to 
put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple 
openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases 
for policy deployment.

Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an 
Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce 
how to best integrate congress with vanilla openstack? Will some of you 
attend LF Collaboration Summit?

Thanks a lot :)

--
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard  Patent/IT Prooduct Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.commailto:huangzhip...@huawei.com
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

2015-02-11 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Hi Tim,

It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at 
our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of 
Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal 
is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the 
OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases

I would be doing the same with ODL but I'm not as far on getting ready with it. 
So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other 
policy-related projects
(fault managementhttps://wiki.opnfv.org/doctor, resource 
managementhttps://wiki.opnfv.org/promise, resource 
schedulerhttps://wiki.opnfv.org/requirements_projects/resource_scheduler) 
with Congress experts would be great.

Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal 
for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. 
We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to 
address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. 
TBD

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT

From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between 
OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Hi Zhipeng,

We'd be happy to meet.  Sounds like fun!

I don't know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF 
collaboration summit.  But we might be able to send a couple of people if it's 
the only real chance to have a face-to-face.  Otherwise, there are a bunch of 
us in and around Palo Alto.  And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine 
options as well.

Tim



On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang 
zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Congress Team,

As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy 
called 
Copperhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=,
 in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to 
put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple 
openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases 
for policy deployment.

Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an 
Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce 
how to best integrate congress with vanilla openstack? Will some of you 
attend LF Collaboration Summit?

Thanks a lot :)

--
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard  Patent/IT Prooduct Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.commailto:huangzhip...@huawei.com
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Email: zhipe...@uci.edumailto:zhipe...@uci.edu
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev