Re: [openstack-dev] [depfreeze][horizon] Exception for lesscpy=0.10.1

2014-03-26 Thread Adam Nelson
I'm not sure why there's so much resistance to Python package version
minimums being increased.  Everybody should be using virtualenvs anyway so
it's not like there's some sort of need to support old libraries because
that's what's on deployed OSes.

I understand supporting old kernels, system libraries, etc... but just
don't get why Python libs should be held back.

In addition, deepfreeze blocking version upgrades is really an old
fashioned way of thinking.

--
Kili - Cloud for Africa: kili.io
Musings: twitter.com/varud https://twitter.com/varud
More Musings: varud.com
About Adam: www.linkedin.com/in/adamcnelson


On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Sascha Peilicke sasc...@mailbox.orgwrote:

 Hi,

 there's been a review up for some time [0] that wants to raise the version
 of
 lesscpy to 0.10.1. It's specific to horizon and contains some important
 fixes
 that we'll likely want to include. So I'd like to ask for an exception for
 this one.

 [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70619/
 --
 Viele Grüße,
 Sascha Peilicke

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [depfreeze][horizon] Exception for lesscpy=0.10.1

2014-03-26 Thread Chuck Short
Hi,

Could you possibly add whats new in the changelog as well?

Thanks
chuck


On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Sascha Peilicke sasc...@mailbox.orgwrote:

 Hi,

 there's been a review up for some time [0] that wants to raise the version
 of
 lesscpy to 0.10.1. It's specific to horizon and contains some important
 fixes
 that we'll likely want to include. So I'd like to ask for an exception for
 this one.

 [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70619/
 --
 Viele Grüße,
 Sascha Peilicke

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [depfreeze][horizon] Exception for lesscpy=0.10.1

2014-03-26 Thread Sean Dague
It's not expected that you are installing all of openstack into venvs,
it's expected that it works at a system level.

That's always been a design point given that Linux distributions
actually want to ship all this stuff.

-Sean

On 03/26/2014 08:28 AM, Adam Nelson wrote:
 I'm not sure why there's so much resistance to Python package version
 minimums being increased.  Everybody should be using virtualenvs anyway
 so it's not like there's some sort of need to support old libraries
 because that's what's on deployed OSes.
 
 I understand supporting old kernels, system libraries, etc... but just
 don't get why Python libs should be held back.
 
 In addition, deepfreeze blocking version upgrades is really an old
 fashioned way of thinking.  
 
 --
 Kili - Cloud for Africa: kili.io http://kili.io/
 Musings: twitter.com/varud https://twitter.com/varud
 More Musings: varud.com http://varud.com/
 About Adam: www.linkedin.com/in/adamcnelson
 https://www.linkedin.com/in/adamcnelson
 
 
 On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Sascha Peilicke sasc...@mailbox.org
 mailto:sasc...@mailbox.org wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 there's been a review up for some time [0] that wants to raise the
 version of
 lesscpy to 0.10.1. It's specific to horizon and contains some
 important fixes
 that we'll likely want to include. So I'd like to ask for an
 exception for
 this one.
 
 [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70619/
 --
 Viele Grüße,
 Sascha Peilicke
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 
 
 
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 


-- 
Sean Dague
Samsung Research America
s...@dague.net / sean.da...@samsung.com
http://dague.net



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [depfreeze][horizon] Exception for lesscpy=0.10.1

2014-03-26 Thread Julie Pichon
On 26/03/14 12:14, Sascha Peilicke wrote:
 Hi,
 
 there's been a review up for some time [0] that wants to raise the version of 
 lesscpy to 0.10.1. It's specific to horizon and contains some important fixes 
 that we'll likely want to include. So I'd like to ask for an exception for 
 this one.
 
 [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70619/
 

The review comments indicate this is needed for Bootstrap 3, which was
deferred to Juno. Is it needed for something else in Icehouse? Is
something broken without it? If not, it seems to me it's probably ok to
merge only at the beginning of Juno.

Otherwise, apparently I've been running with 0.10.1 in some of my VMs
for a few weeks and didn't notice any problems, FWIW. It also has the
advantage of being a proper release as opposed to beta.

Thanks,

Julie


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [depfreeze][horizon] Exception for lesscpy=0.10.1

2014-03-26 Thread Sascha Peilicke
On Wednesday 26 March 2014 13:49:48 Julie Pichon wrote:
 On 26/03/14 12:14, Sascha Peilicke wrote:
  Hi,
  
  there's been a review up for some time [0] that wants to raise the version
  of lesscpy to 0.10.1. It's specific to horizon and contains some
  important fixes that we'll likely want to include. So I'd like to ask for
  an exception for this one.
  
  [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70619/
 
 The review comments indicate this is needed for Bootstrap 3, which was
 deferred to Juno. Is it needed for something else in Icehouse? Is
 something broken without it? If not, it seems to me it's probably ok to
 merge only at the beginning of Juno.
 
 Otherwise, apparently I've been running with 0.10.1 in some of my VMs
 for a few weeks and didn't notice any problems, FWIW. It also has the
 advantage of being a proper release as opposed to beta.

Would work for me too, let's defer it then.

-- 
Viele Grüße,
Sascha Peilicke

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev