Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Using upstream packages & modules

2015-11-13 Thread Alexander Kostrikov
Hi, Alex! Good to know someone is doing that. One question about Your initiative: Are You going to reimplement all MOS HA features? Seems first implementation of 'upstream on Fuel' will be HA-less. On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10,

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Using upstream packages & modules

2015-11-13 Thread Alex Schultz
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Alexander Kostrikov wrote: > Hi, Alex! > Good to know someone is doing that. > > One question about Your initiative: > Are You going to reimplement all MOS HA features? > Seems first implementation of 'upstream on Fuel' will be HA-less. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Using upstream packages & modules

2015-11-11 Thread Alex Schultz
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Vladimir Kuklin wrote: > Alex > > Thanks for your very detailed answer - it clarified things a bit. So, if you > would allow me to rephrase it - you are actually conducting a research on > what is the actual gap between our downstream/fork

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Using upstream packages & modules

2015-11-10 Thread Alex Schultz
Hey Vladimir, On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Vladimir Kuklin wrote: > Alex > > That's great to hear that. But be aware - making all of the components work > exactly the way they work within MOS is actually identical to upstreaming > MOS. We are using some components of

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Using upstream packages & modules

2015-11-10 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Alex Thanks for your very detailed answer - it clarified things a bit. So, if you would allow me to rephrase it - you are actually conducting a research on what is the actual gap between our downstream/fork and upstream UCA/puppet-openstack. This seems to be a very promising initiative. Are you

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Using upstream packages & modules

2015-11-10 Thread Stanislaw Bogatkin
Hi Simon, using 'include' in HAProxy is damn conveniently, I don't think it should die. There is just one way I know to use haproxy with several different conf's - to construct looong command line with all of them - and it's really inconvenient. On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Simon

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Using upstream packages & modules

2015-11-10 Thread Simon Pasquier
Hello Alex! On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > Hey folks, > > I'm testing[0] out flipping our current method of consuming upstream > puppet modules from using pinned versions hosted on fuel-infra to be > able to use the ones directly from upstream

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Using upstream packages & modules

2015-11-10 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Alex That's great to hear that. But be aware - making all of the components work exactly the way they work within MOS is actually identical to upstreaming MOS. We are using some components of different versions to satisfy many requirements for our Reference Architecutre implementation. It will