Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] about use shared image with each other

no quota necessary for this operation. >   > -- Original -- > *From: * "Brian Rosmaita"; > *Date: * Mon, Nov 19, 2018 10:26 PM > *To: * "OpenStack Developmen"; > *Subject: * Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] about use shared image with >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] about use shared image with each other

2018 10:26 PM To: "OpenStack Developmen"; Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] about use shared image with each other On 11/19/18 7:58 AM, Rambo wrote: > Hi,all > > Recently, I want to use the shared image with each other.I find it > isn't convenient that the pr

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] about use shared image with each other

On 11/19/18 7:58 AM, Rambo wrote: > Hi,all > >      Recently, I want to use the shared image with each other.I find it > isn't convenient that the producer notifies the consumer via email which > the image has been shared and what its UUID is. In other words, why the > image api v2 is no

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][upgrade-checkers] Question about glance rocky upgrade release note

I haven't implemented any checks, but I did take a shot at laying down the scaffolding for implementing upgrade checks in glance [0]. Anyone who is more familiar with glance should be able to build off of that commit by implementing specific checks in glance/cmd/status.py [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][upgrade-checkers] Question about glance rocky upgrade release note

On 9/24/18 3:13 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 9/24/2018 2:06 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> Are there more specific docs about how to configure the 'image import' >> feature so that I can be sure I'm careful? In other words, are there >> specific things a "glance-status upgrade check" check could

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance API Caching Enhancements for Edge Computing

;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > *Subject: *Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance API Caching Enhancements > for Edge Computing > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > Have you actually filed a blueprint or specs for this in glance?

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance API Caching Enhancements for Edge Computing

k.org" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance API Caching Enhancements for Edge Computing Hi Greg, Have you actually filed a blueprint or specs for this in glance? If yes could you please provide a reference for the same. Thanks & Best Regards, Abhishek Kekane On Thu, Oct 4,

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance API Caching Enhancements for Edge Computing

Hi Greg, Have you actually filed a blueprint or specs for this in glance? If yes could you please provide a reference for the same. Thanks & Best Regards, Abhishek Kekane On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:34 AM Waines, Greg wrote: > Glance Team, > > > > I am following up on discussions in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][upgrade-checkers] Question about glance rocky upgrade release note

On 9/24/2018 2:06 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Are there more specific docs about how to configure the 'image import' feature so that I can be sure I'm careful? In other words, are there specific things a "glance-status upgrade check" check could look at and say, "your image import configuration

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][keystone][nova][ironic][tripleo][edge][airship] Edge related joint sessions at the PTG next week

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:41 PM Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > Hi, > > The PTG is approaching quickly and as we are planning a couple of joint > sessions on edge computing with a couple of OpenStack project teams I would > like to give a quick summary of the plans. > > We have the Edge Computing Group

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][horizon] Issues we found when using Community Images

Hi again Andy, Thanks for the update. Sounds like there is some work to do in various client libraries first. I also just tried to launch a Sahara cluster against a community image-- it failed, because our current validation wants the image ID to actually appear in the image list. So there will

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][horizon] Issues we found when using Community Images

Hi Jeremy, > Can you comment more on what needs to be updated in Sahara? Are they > simply issues in the UI (sahara-dashboard) or is there a problem > consuming community images on the server side? We haven't looked into it much yet, so I couldn't tell you. I think it would be great to extend

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][horizon] Issues we found when using Community Images

Hi Andy, Can you comment more on what needs to be updated in Sahara? Are they simply issues in the UI (sahara-dashboard) or is there a problem consuming community images on the server side? I'm happy to pitch in, just would like to do it efficiently. Thanks, Jeremy On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 5:31

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][horizon] Issues we found when using Community Images

On 08/22/2018 04:31 PM, Andy Botting wrote: Hi all, We've recently moved to using Glance's community visibility on the Nectar Research Cloud. We had lots of public images (12255), and we found it was becoming slow to list them all and the community image visibility seems to fit our use-case

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE for multi-backend

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:35 PM, Abhishek Kekane wrote: > I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for Multiple backend support > (multi-store) > feature [0]. The only remaining work is a versioning patch to flag this > feature as > experimental and should be completed early next week. > > [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE for multihash

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for the glance-side work for > the Secure Hash Algorithm Support (multihash) feature [0]. The work > is underway and should be completed early next week. > > cheers, > brian > > [0] >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][glance_store] Functional testing of multiple backend

Hi Tomoki, Thank you for your efforts, I will check this out. Seems like with the patch you have mentioned multi store works with cinder as well. Thank you again. On Sat 30 Jun, 2018, 18:05 Tomoki Sekiyama, wrote: > Hi Abhishek, > > Thanks for your work. > I have added a way to configure

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] python-glanceclient release status

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > These need to be reviewed in master: > - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50/ > - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/556292/ Thanks for the reviews. The requested changes have been made and Zuul has given a

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] python-glanceclient release status

Adding another review to the list: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/556292/ Also, https://review.openstack.org/50 has been updated with more tests. Once those are approved, they'll need to be backported to stable/queens so we can release 2.10.0 On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 8:55 PM, Brian

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] New image backend: StorPool

Just updating the subject line tag to glance. ;) On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 05:33:30PM +0200, Peter Penchev wrote: > Hi, > > A couple of years ago I created a Nova spec for the StorPool image > backend: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137830/ There was some > discussion, but then our company

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Changes to Glance core team

On 01/03/18 12:09 +, Erno Kuvaja wrote: 2) Removing Flavio Percoco from Glance core. Flavio requested to be removed already couple of cycles ago and we did beg him to stick around to help with the Interoperable Image Import which of he has been integral part of designing since the very

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Changes to Glance core team

Thanks team - glad to be able to help out and I am hoping I can dig in more and be able to contribute where I can! Sean > On Mar 1, 2018, at 06:22, Abhishek Kekane wrote: > > Big +1 to Sean, he has been doing wonderful job for us. > Thank you, Flavio and Mike, hope to see

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Changes to Glance core team

Big +1 to Sean, he has been doing wonderful job for us. Thank you, Flavio and Mike, hope to see you back. Cheers, Abhishek On 01-Mar-2018 17:40, "Erno Kuvaja" wrote: > Hi all, > > At the start of the cycle is good time to have a look of the Glance > reviewers and based on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Changes to Glance core team

+1 to all the above. Thanks for Flavio and Mike for all they've done for Glance, and looking forward to working more with Sean in the future. cheers, brian On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote: > Hi all, > > At the start of the cycle is good time to have a look

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][cinder]Question about cinder as glance store

On 07/02, Erlon Cruz wrote: > That will depend on the Cinder/OS-brick iscsiadm versions right? Can you > tell what are the versions from where the problem was fixed? > > Erlon > Hi, Like you said it depends on your Cinder and OS-Brick versions, and the open-iscsi package will be different

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][cinder]Question about cinder as glance store

Hello Gorka, Thank you for replying! I'll try to run glance-api and cinder-volume on the same node according to your information. On 2018/02/07 19:27, Gorka Eguileor wrote: On 07/02, Rikimaru Honjo wrote: Hello, I'm planning to use cinder as glance store. And, I'll setup cinder to connect

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][cinder]Question about cinder as glance store

That will depend on the Cinder/OS-brick iscsiadm versions right? Can you tell what are the versions from where the problem was fixed? Erlon 2018-02-07 8:27 GMT-02:00 Gorka Eguileor : > On 07/02, Rikimaru Honjo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm planning to use cinder as glance

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][cinder]Question about cinder as glance store

On 07/02, Rikimaru Honjo wrote: > Hello, > > I'm planning to use cinder as glance store. > And, I'll setup cinder to connect storage by iSCSI multipath. > > In this case, can I run glance-api and cinder-volume on the same node? > > In my understanding, glance-api will attach a volume to own node

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE request for --check feature

Thanks for following up on this, Abhishek. After our discussion approving this at the weekly meeting, I completely forgot to send out an update. As Abhishek indicated, the discussion was positive, and this FFE is APPROVED. cheers, brian On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:56 AM, Abhishek Kekane

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE request for --check feature

Sorry, Forgot to add meeting logs link in previous mail. Here it is; http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2018/glance.2018-02-01-14.01.log.html#l-164 Thank you, Abhishek Kekane On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Abhishek Kekane wrote: > We have discussed this in

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE request for --check feature

We have discussed this in glance weekly meeting [1] and most of the core reviewers are inclined towards accepting this FFE. +1 from my side as this --check command will be very helpful for operators. Thank you Bhagyashri for working on this. Abhishek Kekane On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:29 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][PTL] Nomination for Glance PTL for Rocky cycle

All the best Erno, Long may you reign ;) Abhishek On 31-Jan-2018 18:38, "Erno Kuvaja" wrote: > Hi all, > > After lengthy discussions and careful thinking I have thrown my name > into the hat for Glance PTL. You can find my thoughts from the > candidacy patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Q-3 milestone released

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: [snip] > Glance cores, please do not merge any patches until after > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536630/ has merged. The patch merged at 08:15UTC today. Merge away (subject to common sense and the fact that

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] PTL non-candidacy

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I've been PTL of Glance through some rocky times, but have decided not > to stand for election for the Rocky cycle. My plan is to stick > around, attend to my duties as a glance core contributor, and support >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] PTL non-candidacy

Excerpts from Brian Rosmaita's message of 2018-01-29 14:18:18 -0500: > I've been PTL of Glance through some rocky times, but have decided not > to stand for election for the Rocky cycle. My plan is to stick > around, attend to my duties as a glance core contributor, and support > my successor in

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] PTL non-candidacy

++ Thanks for leadership within Glance and everything else you've done in the community! -- Kevin Carter IRC: Cloudnull On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 02:18:18PM -0500, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > > I've been PTL of Glance

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] PTL non-candidacy

Thanks so much for your remarkable work for glance for the couple of cycles. You have introduced very good processes like weekly priorities which helped community members to keep focused on priorities. It’s my pleasure to work with you, and yet I need to learn lot from you. Wish you all the best

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] PTL non-candidacy

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 02:18:18PM -0500, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I've been PTL of Glance through some rocky times, but have decided not > to stand for election for the Rocky cycle. My plan is to stick > around, attend to my duties as a glance core contributor, and support > my successor in

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] functional gate situation

Update on the 24 hours since the last update: tl;dr: glance cores, do not approve any substantial code changes until after the functional tests are restored. See below for details. On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > Update on the last 24 hours:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] py27 gate situation

Confirmed that no issue in loading the middleware, problem lies somewhere else. Still trying to figure it out. Thanks & Regards, Abhishek On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Abhishek Kekane wrote: > I have tried to debug this in my environment but so far not able to find >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] py27 gate situation

I have tried to debug this in my environment but so far not able to find the reason. While starting the api service from functional tests it fails to load middleware 'rootapp' from api-paste.ini What I have done is added below lines in tox.ini to enable debugging of functional tests

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][oslo][requirements] [ironic]oslo.serialization fails with glance

On 18-01-17 21:24:12, John Villalovos wrote: > I have updated the bug with info I found out: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.serialization/+bug/1728368 > > Also I did a test patch with a proposed change: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/535166/ > > This patch causes the unit tests to work. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][oslo][requirements] [ironic]oslo.serialization fails with glance

I have updated the bug with info I found out: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.serialization/+bug/1728368 Also I did a test patch with a proposed change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/535166/ This patch causes the unit tests to work. As a note there is a deprecation warning in the current

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][oslo][requirements] [ironic]oslo.serialization fails with glance

add Ironic team in the loop the revert patch got -1 from ironic folks , more details please see the comments in https://review.openstack.org/534736 The possible solution is to figure out why the change break Glance's unit test. which side should be fixed. 2018-01-17 20:14 GMT+08:00

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][oslo][requirements] oslo.serialization fails with glance

On 18-01-16 19:12:16, ChangBo Guo wrote: > What's the issue for Glance, any bug link ? > > 2018-01-16 0:12 GMT+08:00 Matthew Thode : > > > On 18-01-13 00:41:28, Matthew Thode wrote: > > > https://review.openstack.org/531788 is the review we are seeing it in, > > > but

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][oslo][requirements] oslo.serialization fails with glance

What's the issue for Glance, any bug link ? 2018-01-16 0:12 GMT+08:00 Matthew Thode : > On 18-01-13 00:41:28, Matthew Thode wrote: > > https://review.openstack.org/531788 is the review we are seeing it in, > > but 2.22.0 failed as well. > > > > I'm guessing it was

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][oslo][requirements] oslo.serialization fails with glance

On 18-01-13 00:41:28, Matthew Thode wrote: > https://review.openstack.org/531788 is the review we are seeing it in, > but 2.22.0 failed as well. > > I'm guessing it was introduced in either > > https://github.com/openstack/oslo.serialization/commit/c1a7079c26d27a2e46cca26963d3d9aa040bdbe8 > or >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Nikhil Komawar for glance core

Thank you all for the support. I intend to help the Glance community flourish, again. cheers On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > Having heard only positive responses, I'm happy to reinstate Nikhil > Komawar as a glance core, with all the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Nikhil Komawar for glance core

Having heard only positive responses, I'm happy to reinstate Nikhil Komawar as a glance core, with all the rights and privileges pertaining thereto. Welcome back, Nikhil! cheers, brian On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Abhishek Kekane wrote: > Big +2 > Glad you are back :) >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Nikhil Komawar for glance core

Big +2 Glad you are back :) Abhishek On 17-Nov-2017 4:59 AM, "Brian Rosmaita" wrote: > I'm sure I don't need to introduce Nikhil Komawar (nikhil in IRC), who > was Glance PTL for the Kilo, Liberty, and Newton releases and who was > a long time Glance core until he

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Does glance_store swift driver support range requests ?

On 15 Nov 2017, at 7:40, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 11/15/2017 06:28 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: >> On 15 November 2017 at 11:15, Matt Keenan wrote: >>> On 13/11/17 22:51, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >>> >>> I think it will a rather hard problem to solve. As swift store can be >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Does glance_store swift driver support range requests ?

On 11/15/2017 06:28 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 15 November 2017 at 11:15, Matt Keenan wrote: On 13/11/17 22:51, Nikhil Komawar wrote: I think it will a rather hard problem to solve. As swift store can be configured to store objects in different configurations. I guess

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Does glance_store swift driver support range requests ?

On 15 November 2017 at 11:15, Matt Keenan wrote: > On 13/11/17 22:51, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > > I think it will a rather hard problem to solve. As swift store can be > configured to store objects in different configurations. I guess the next > question would be, what is

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Does glance_store swift driver support range requests ?

On 13/11/17 22:51, Nikhil Komawar wrote: I think it will a rather hard problem to solve. As swift store can be configured to store objects in different configurations. I guess the next question would be, what is your underlying problem -- multiple build requests or is this for retry for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Does glance_store swift driver support range requests ?

I think it will a rather hard problem to solve. As swift store can be configured to store objects in different configurations. I guess the next question would be, what is your underlying problem -- multiple build requests or is this for retry for a single download? If the image is in image cache

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Image encryption

Hey, the feature still exists. you may read about it more on https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/doc/source/user/signature.rst , https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/glance-specs/specs/liberty/image-signing-and-verification-support.html for future references, please look/search at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Security] Secure Hash Algorithm Spec

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-09-29 12:31:21 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: > [...] >> Can someone please inform me how changing the checksum algorithm >> for this operation to SHA-1 or something else would improve the >> security of this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Security] Secure Hash Algorithm Spec

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 09/29/2017 06:19 AM, Luke Hinds wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:38 PM, McClymont Jr, Scott < >> scott.mcclym...@verizonwireless.com > nwireless.com>> wrote: >> >> Hey All, >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Security] Secure Hash Algorithm Spec

On 2017-09-29 12:31:21 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: [...] > Can someone please inform me how changing the checksum algorithm > for this operation to SHA-1 or something else would improve the > security of this operation? [...] The current known flaws in MD5 pretty much boil down to this one

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Security] Secure Hash Algorithm Spec

On 09/29/2017 06:19 AM, Luke Hinds wrote: On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:38 PM, McClymont Jr, Scott > wrote: Hey All, I've got a spec up for a change I want to implement in Glance for Queens to enhance

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Arnaud MORIN wrote: > My objective is to be able to download and upload from glance/computes to > swift in a faster way. > I was thinking that if glance could parallelizes the connections to swift > for a single image (with chunks), it

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Arnaud MORIN wrote: > My objective is to be able to download and upload from glance/computes to > swift in a faster way. > I was thinking that if glance could parallelizes the connections to swift > for a single image (with chunks), it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Security] Secure Hash Algorithm Spec

Thanks Scott, makes sense. On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Luke Hinds wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:38 PM, McClymont Jr, Scott verizonwireless.com> wrote: > >> Hey All, >> >> I've got a spec up for a change I want to implement in Glance for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Security] Secure Hash Algorithm Spec

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:38 PM, McClymont Jr, Scott < scott.mcclym...@verizonwireless.com> wrote: > Hey All, > > I've got a spec up for a change I want to implement in Glance for Queens > to enhance the current checksum (md5) functionality with a stronger hash > algorithm. I'm going to do this

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

My objective is to be able to download and upload from glance/computes to swift in a faster way. I was thinking that if glance could parallelizes the connections to swift for a single image (with chunks), it would be faster. Am I wrong ? Is there any other way I am not thinking of? Arnaud. Le 28

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Arnaud MORIN wrote: > Hey all, > So I finally tested your pull requests, it does not work. > 1 - For uploads, swiftclient is not using threads when source is given by > glance: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

Hey all, So I finally tested your pull requests, it does not work. 1 - For uploads, swiftclient is not using threads when source is given by glance: https://github.com/openstack/python-swiftclient/blob/master/swiftclient/service.py#L1847 2 - For downloads, when requesting the file from swift, it

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Queens PTG: Thursday summary

Not ideal because we also have the real usecase for community images. When users start to create/use community images these different use cases (old public and real community) will be mixed. Cheers, Belmiro On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 at 15:37, Blair Bethwaite wrote: > On

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Queens PTG: Thursday summary

On 27 September 2017 at 22:40, Belmiro Moreira wrote: > In the past we used the tabs but latest Horizon versions use the visibility > column/search instead. > The issue is that we would like the old images to continue to be > discoverable by everyone and

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Queens PTG: Thursday summary

Hi Blair, In the past we used the tabs but latest Horizon versions use the visibility column/search instead. The issue is that we would like the old images to continue to be discoverable by everyone and have a image list that only shows the latest ones. If the images continue to be public they

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Queens PTG: Thursday summary

Hi Belmiro, On 20 Sep. 2017 7:58 pm, "Belmiro Moreira" < moreira.belmiro.email.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Discovering the latest image release is hard. So we added an image property "recommended" > that we update when a new image release is available. Also, we patched horizon to show > the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Queens PTG: Thursday summary

Hi Belmiro, Thanks for the feedback about the "hidden" property. To push this along, would you mind reading through this patch and the comments on it and responding? Or if you think it's close to a working proposal, you could grab the text, revise, make Fei Long a co-author, and propose it for

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Queens PTG: Thursday summary

Hi Brian, as we discussed in the past the image lifecycle has been a problem for us for a long time. However, I have some concerns in adding/maintaining a new project only to help the image discovery. At CERN we have a small set of images that we maintain and offer as "public" images to

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Queens PTG: Thursday summary

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Belmiro Moreira wrote: > Hi Brian, > Thanks for the sessions summaries. > > We are really interested in the image lifecycle support. > Can you elaborate how searchlight would help solving this problem? The role we see for

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Queens PTG: Thursday summary

Hi Brian, Thanks for the sessions summaries. We are really interested in the image lifecycle support. Can you elaborate how searchlight would help solving this problem? thanks, Belmiro CERN On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > For those who

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (09/08-09/14)

Hi Brian, Thanks a lot for appreciation. It was a great opportunity for me to work along with you, jokke and other peoples on glance pike cycle. A huge learning platform for me. It is my pleasure to be a part of glance core. Thank you, Abhishek Kekane From:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] confirming Abhishek Kekane for glance core

Hi Brian, Thanks a lot for appreciation. It was a great opportunity for me to work along with you, jokke and other peoples on glance pike cycle. A huge learning platform for me. It is my pleasure to be a part of glance core. Thank you, Abhishek Kekane From:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

Hey, I would love to see that reviving! Cheers, Arnaud On 6 September 2017 at 21:00, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > Hey! As you said it's not possible now. > > I implemented the support several years ago, bit unfortunately no one > wanted to review it:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

Hey! As you said it's not possible now. I implemented the support several years ago, bit unfortunately no one wanted to review it: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218993 If you want, we can revive it. Best, Mike On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

I'm pretty sure that would only be possible with a code change in glance to move the consumption of the swiftclient abstraction up a layer from the client/connection objects to swiftclient's service objects [1]. I'm not sure if that'd be something that would make a lot of sense to the Image

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] docs: architecture or hw_architecture

Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2017-08-23 13:48:07 -0500: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Brian Rosmaita > wrote: > > My point is just that Glance went one way on this, Nova went a > > different way, and users are left hanging. My secondary point is that >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] docs: architecture or hw_architecture

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > My point is just that Glance went one way on this, Nova went a > different way, and users are left hanging. My secondary point is that > it might be useful to catalog these things in the metadata definitions >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] docs: architecture or hw_architecture

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > On 23.08.2017 14:47, Brian Rosmaita wrote: >> 'architecture' is one of the "common image properties" that was >> introduced in Folsom in an effort to standardize use of image >> metadata. It's not a mistake in

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] docs: architecture or hw_architecture

On 23.08.2017 14:47, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > 'architecture' is one of the "common image properties" that was > introduced in Folsom in an effort to standardize use of image > metadata. It's not a mistake in the Glance docs, it's just that Nova > is looking for a differently named property. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] docs: architecture or hw_architecture

'architecture' is one of the "common image properties" that was introduced in Folsom in an effort to standardize use of image metadata. It's not a mistake in the Glance docs, it's just that Nova is looking for a differently named property. Glance has had a metadata definitions service [0,1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] docs: architecture or hw_architecture

On 22.08.2017 17:10, Markus Zoeller wrote: > I'm wondering if there is an issue in the docs which describe the > possible image metadata properties: > https://docs.openstack.org/python-glanceclient/latest/cli/property-keys.html# > > This document says to use `architecture` (e.g. x86_64 or s390x

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][rally] Disabling Glance Testing in Rally gates

...@nttdata.com] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 2:45 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][rally] Disabling Glance Testing in Rally gates Someone has reported this issue in glance recently. Please refer, https://bugs.launchpad.net

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][rally] Disabling Glance Testing in Rally gates

questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][rally] Disabling Glance Testing in Rally gates Hi Flavio, 2017-07-13 11:16 GMT+03:00 Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com<mailto:fla...@redhat.com>>: On 13/07/17 00:56 -0700, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Hi stackers, Unfortunately what was discus

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][rally] Disabling Glance Testing in Rally gates

Hi Flavio, 2017-07-13 11:16 GMT+03:00 Flavio Percoco : > On 13/07/17 00:56 -0700, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > >> Hi stackers, >> >> >> Unfortunately what was discussed in other thread (situation in glance is >> critical) happened. >> Glance stopped working and Rally team is forced

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][rally] Disabling Glance Testing in Rally gates

On 13/07/17 00:56 -0700, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Hi stackers, Unfortunately what was discussed in other thread (situation in glance is critical) happened. Glance stopped working and Rally team is forced to disable checking of it in Rally gates. P.S. Seems like this patch is casing the problems:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] stepping down from glance core and other related groups

Hi Nikhil, I am very thankful for support and guidance you have provided to me and other new members. Hoping to work with you again in near future. All the best for your future activities. Cheers, Abhishek Sent from OWA on Android From: Nikhil Komawar

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] stepping down from glance core and other related groups

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > I am thankful to the community for such amazing experience over the past few > years. And the Glance community is thankful for your service, which includes three cycles as the Glance PTL! > For the changes required

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Abhishek Kekane for glance core

This is a good move. I appreciate strong decisions as these are much needed now. On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I'm nominating Abhishek Kekane (abhishekk on IRC) to be a Glance core > for the Pike cycle. Abhishek has been around the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Stepping down from core

Fei Long: On behalf of the entire Glance team, thank you for your extensive past service to Glance. We hope that you'll be able to find time to work on Glance again in the future. cheers, brian On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Stepping down from core

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 20/06/17 09:31 +1200, feilong wrote: >> >> Hi there, >> >> I've been a Glance core since 2013 and been involved in the Glance >> community even longer, so I care deeply about Glance. My situation right now >> is such

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Abhishek Kekane for glance core

Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Abhishek Kekane for glance core Having heard only affirmative responses, I've added Abhishek Kekane to the Glance core group, with all the rights and privileges pertaining thereto. Welcome to the Glance core

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Abhishek Kekane for glance core

Having heard only affirmative responses, I've added Abhishek Kekane to the Glance core group, with all the rights and privileges pertaining thereto. Welcome to the Glance core team, Abhishek! cheers, brian On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > Wasn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Abhishek Kekane for glance core

Wasn't Abhishek a glance core before? What a surprise for me o_O I thought that he was just being modest and did not put -2 on the patches. Undoubtedly, we need to correct this misunderstanding as quickly as possible and invite Abhishek to the core team. On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Erno

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Stepping down from core

On 20/06/17 09:31 +1200, feilong wrote: Hi there, I've been a Glance core since 2013 and been involved in the Glance community even longer, so I care deeply about Glance. My situation right now is such that I cannot devote sufficient time to Glance, and while as you've seen elsewhere on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Abhishek Kekane for glance core

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I'm nominating Abhishek Kekane (abhishekk on IRC) to be a Glance core > for the Pike cycle. Abhishek has been around the Glance community for > a long time and is familiar with the architecture and design

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >