Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [kolla] [magnum] [nova] [neutron] Vancouver Summit Operations Containers Session

2015-05-26 Thread Richard Raseley
Flavio Percoco wrote: There's work going on on something called Artifacts[0], which - in a poorly worded definition - is an enhancement of the current image model in Glance. It'll take some time for the full migration to happen but that should solve your requirement. [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [kolla] [magnum] [nova] [neutron] Vancouver Summit Operations Containers Session

2015-05-25 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 22/05/15 12:35 -0700, Richard Raseley wrote: Daniel Comnea wrote: Since i couldn't attend the summit, are there any AIs which needs to happen/ take place and which i can keep an eye on? There weren't any action items, which aren't already (in whole or in part) in flight as part of their

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [kolla] [magnum] [nova] [neutron] Vancouver Summit Operations Containers Session

2015-05-22 Thread Adrian Otto
Thanks Richard. I found the following questions in the etherpad: How do we give an environment on OpenStack resources to someone who just wants to use Docker ? In that case use Magnum, and have the user start a Docker Swarm bay. Then they can point their docker client directly at the swarm

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [kolla] [magnum] [nova] [neutron] Vancouver Summit Operations Containers Session

2015-05-22 Thread Richard Raseley
Daniel Comnea wrote: Since i couldn't attend the summit, are there any AIs which needs to happen/ take place and which i can keep an eye on? There weren't any action items, which aren't already (in whole or in part) in flight as part of their respective product discussions. From my

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [kolla] [magnum] [nova] [neutron] Vancouver Summit Operations Containers Session

2015-05-20 Thread Daniel Comnea
Great info, thanks for sharing. Since i couldn't attend the summit, are there any AIs which needs to happen/ take place and which i can keep an eye on? thanks, Dani On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Richard Raseley rich...@raseley.com wrote: I apologize if this message is inappropriately