2015-08-27 18:43 GMT+02:00 Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com:
Excerpts from Lucas Alvares Gomes's message of 2015-08-27 02:40:26 -0700:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Julia Kreger
juliaashleykre...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies for not expressing my thoughts on this matter
sooner,
Excerpts from Lucas Alvares Gomes's message of 2015-08-27 02:40:26 -0700:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Julia Kreger
juliaashleykre...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies for not expressing my thoughts on this matter
sooner, however I've had to spend some time collecting my
thoughts.
To
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Lucas Alvares Gomes's message of 2015-08-27 02:40:26 -0700:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Julia Kreger
juliaashleykre...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies for not expressing my thoughts on this matter
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Julia Kreger
juliaashleykre...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies for not expressing my thoughts on this matter
sooner, however I've had to spend some time collecting my
thoughts.
To me, it seems like we do not trust our users. Granted,
when I say users, I mean
On 08/27/2015 11:40 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Julia Kreger
juliaashleykre...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies for not expressing my thoughts on this matter
sooner, however I've had to spend some time collecting my
thoughts.
To me, it seems like we do not
My apologies for not expressing my thoughts on this matter
sooner, however I've had to spend some time collecting my
thoughts.
To me, it seems like we do not trust our users. Granted,
when I say users, I mean administrators who likely know more
about the disposition and capabilities of their
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:48:29AM +0100, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi,
After thinking about this some more, I'm not actually going to address Rob's
points above. What I want to do is go back and discuss... what do people
think about having an API that allows the initial provision state
On 21 Aug 2015 6:45 am, Jim Rollenhagen
+1, there are tons of dragons here. Now that we're to the point where
our state machine is well-defined with a single entrypoint, I think
I'm clearly confused. When was 1.6 deleted?
Rob
Hi
On 21 Aug 2015 6:45 am, Jim Rollenhagen
+1, there are tons of dragons here. Now that we're to the point where
our state machine is well-defined with a single entrypoint, I think
I'm clearly confused. When was 1.6 deleted?
It wasn't and won't be AFAICT. But I think Jim is talking about
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:57:14PM +0100, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi
On 21 Aug 2015 6:45 am, Jim Rollenhagen
+1, there are tons of dragons here. Now that we're to the point where
our state machine is well-defined with a single entrypoint, I think
I'm clearly confused. When was
My opinion:
- If a new API is desirable by operators who would like to skip a few steps
in Ironic before making it active, then we should do it. I mean we should
allow them to skip the enroll state and manageable state, thereby giving
them an opportunity to land the node in manageable or
To be honest, I'm tired of repeating the same arguments again and
again... I personally would like to get something cool done, rather than
discussing how to work around our new state machine again and again.
Now to some trolling: please include a way to users to opt-out from
NOSTATE -
On 08/19/2015 02:05 AM, Ruby Loo wrote:
On 17 August 2015 at 20:20, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 11 August 2015 at 06:13, Ruby Loo rlooya...@gmail.com
mailto:rlooya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After thinking about this some more, I'm not actually going to address Rob's
points above. What I want to do is go back and discuss... what do people
think about having an API that allows the initial provision state to be
specified, for a node that is created in Ironic. I'm assuming that
On 17 August 2015 at 20:20, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 11 August 2015 at 06:13, Ruby Loo rlooya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, sorry for the delay. I vote no. I understand the rationale of
trying to
do things so that we don't break our users but that's what the
15 matches
Mail list logo
