On 09/11/15 11:55, Adam Young wrote:
On 11/09/2015 10:57 AM, Tim Hinrichs wrote:
Congress happens to have the capability to run a script/API call under
arbitrary conditions on the state of other OpenStack projects, which
sounded like what you wanted. Or did I misread your original question?
> On 09 Nov 2015, at 20:43, Adam Young wrote:
>
> On 11/06/2015 06:28 PM, Tim Hinrichs wrote:
>> Congress allows users to write a policy that executes an action under
>> certain conditions.
>>
>> The conditions can be based on any data Congress has access to, which
>>
> On 09 Nov 2015, at 21:57, Tim Hinrichs wrote:
>
> Congress happens to have the capability to run a script/API call under
> arbitrary conditions on the state of other OpenStack projects, which sounded
> like what you wanted. Or did I misread your original question?
>
>
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
> On 06 Nov 2015, at 00:09, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-05 09:51:41 -0800:
>> Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-11-05 12:34:12 -0500:
>>> Can people help me work through the right set of
> On 06 Nov 2015, at 03:41, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-11-05 15:14:03 -0500:
>> On 11/05/2015 01:09 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-05 09:51:41 -0800:
Excerpts from Adam Young's
> On 10 Nov 2015, at 21:29, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
>
>
>> On 09 Nov 2015, at 21:57, Tim Hinrichs wrote:
>>
>> Congress happens to have the capability to run a script/API call under
>> arbitrary conditions on the state of other OpenStack projects, which
On 11/06/2015 06:28 PM, Tim Hinrichs wrote:
Congress allows users to write a policy that executes an action under
certain conditions.
The conditions can be based on any data Congress has access to, which
includes nova servers, neutron networks, cinder storage, keystone
users, etc. We also
They shouldn't be combined because they can each be used without the
other. That is, they each stand on their own.
Congress can be used for monitoring or delegating policy without attempting
to correct violations (i.e. without needing workflows).
Mistral can be used to make complex changes
From this operator’s perspective this is exactly the element of community
culture that, by encouraging the proliferation of projects and tools, is making
the OpenStack landscape more complex and less {user,operator,architect,business
decision maker} friendly.
In my opinion, it is essentially a
Congress happens to have the capability to run a script/API call under
arbitrary conditions on the state of other OpenStack projects, which
sounded like what you wanted. Or did I misread your original question?
Congress and Mistral are definitely not competing.Congress lets people
declare
On 11/09/2015 10:57 AM, Tim Hinrichs wrote:
Congress happens to have the capability to run a script/API call under
arbitrary conditions on the state of other OpenStack projects, which
sounded like what you wanted. Or did I misread your original question?
Congress and Mistral are definitely
Excerpts from Richard Raseley's message of 2015-11-09 10:34:26 -0800:
> From this operator’s perspective this is exactly the element of community
> culture that, by encouraging the proliferation of projects and tools, is
> making the OpenStack landscape more complex and less
>
Congress allows users to write a policy that executes an action under
certain conditions.
The conditions can be based on any data Congress has access to, which
includes nova servers, neutron networks, cinder storage, keystone users,
etc. We also have some Ceilometer statistics; I'm not sure
Excerpts from Dolph Mathews's message of 2015-11-05 16:31:28 -0600:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> > Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-11-05 10:09:49 -0800:
> > > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-05 09:51:41 -0800:
> >
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-05 09:51:41 -0800:
> Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-11-05 12:34:12 -0500:
> > Can people help me work through the right set of tools for this use case
> > (has come up from several Operators) and map out a plan to implement it:
> >
> >
On 11/05/2015 01:09 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-05 09:51:41 -0800:
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-11-05 12:34:12 -0500:
Can people help me work through the right set of tools for this use case
(has come up from several Operators) and map
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-11-05 10:09:49 -0800:
> > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-05 09:51:41 -0800:
> > > Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-11-05 12:34:12 -0500:
> > > >
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-11-05 10:09:49 -0800:
> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-05 09:51:41 -0800:
> > Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-11-05 12:34:12 -0500:
> > > Can people help me work through the right set of tools for this use case
> > > (has
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-11-05 15:14:03 -0500:
> On 11/05/2015 01:09 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-05 09:51:41 -0800:
> >> Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-11-05 12:34:12 -0500:
> >>> Can people help me work through the
19 matches
Mail list logo