Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] IRC: ditch #midonet-dev?

[Sandro Mathys]

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Jan Hilberath  wrote:
> On 2015年12月01日 19:14, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Ivan Kelly  wrote:


 +1 for #2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PS: Beware of the top-posting! It makes vote counting harder ;-)
>>>


 On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Sandro Mathys 
 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Our IRC channels have been neglected for a long time, and as a result
> we lost ownership of #midonet-dev, which is now owner by
> freenode-staff. In theory, it should be very easy to get ownership
> back, particularly since we still own #midonet. But in reality, it
> seems like none of the freenode staff feel responsible for these
> requests, so we still aren't owners after requesting it for 3 weeks
> already.
>
> Therefore, Toni Segura suggested we just ditch it and move to
> #openstack-midonet instead.
>
> However, several people have also said we don't need two channels,
> i.e. we should merge #midonet and #midonet-dev.
>
> So, here's three proposals:
>
> Proposal #1:
> * keep #midonet
> * replace #midonet-dev with #openstack-midonet
>
> Proposal #2:
> * keep #midonet
> * merge #midonet-dev into #midonet
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>>
>> +1
>
>
> +1

Alright, we'll go with #midonet then. I've now configured #midonet-dev
so, that anyone who tries to join it is instead forwarded to #midonet.
I've also set up the same for #openstack-midonet, just in case someone
is looking for us there.

I've also archived all developers' channels on Slack with a note that
we moved to IRC.

Cheers,
Sandro

>>
>>>

>
> Proposal #3:
> * replace both #midonet and #midonet-dev with #openstack-midonet
>
> I don't have any strong feelings for any of the proposals, but suggest
> we go with proposal #2. Traffic in both #midonet and #midonet-dev is
> rather low, so one channel should do - there's way busier OpenStack
> channels out there. Furthermore, #midonet is shorter than
> #openstack-midonet and already established. I also think people will
> rather look in #midonet than #openstack-midonet if they're looking for
> us.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Cheers,
> Sandro
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] IRC: ditch #midonet-dev?

[Jan Hilberath]

On 2015年12月01日 19:14, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon
 wrote:



On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Ivan Kelly  wrote:


+1 for #2



PS: Beware of the top-posting! It makes vote counting harder ;-)




On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Sandro Mathys 
wrote:

Hi,

Our IRC channels have been neglected for a long time, and as a result
we lost ownership of #midonet-dev, which is now owner by
freenode-staff. In theory, it should be very easy to get ownership
back, particularly since we still own #midonet. But in reality, it
seems like none of the freenode staff feel responsible for these
requests, so we still aren't owners after requesting it for 3 weeks
already.

Therefore, Toni Segura suggested we just ditch it and move to
#openstack-midonet instead.

However, several people have also said we don't need two channels,
i.e. we should merge #midonet and #midonet-dev.

So, here's three proposals:

Proposal #1:
* keep #midonet
* replace #midonet-dev with #openstack-midonet

Proposal #2:
* keep #midonet
* merge #midonet-dev into #midonet



+1


+1


+1









Proposal #3:
* replace both #midonet and #midonet-dev with #openstack-midonet

I don't have any strong feelings for any of the proposals, but suggest
we go with proposal #2. Traffic in both #midonet and #midonet-dev is
rather low, so one channel should do - there's way busier OpenStack
channels out there. Furthermore, #midonet is shorter than
#openstack-midonet and already established. I also think people will
rather look in #midonet than #openstack-midonet if they're looking for
us.

Thoughts?

Cheers,
Sandro


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] IRC: ditch #midonet-dev?

[Ivan Kelly]

+1 for #2

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Sandro Mathys  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our IRC channels have been neglected for a long time, and as a result
> we lost ownership of #midonet-dev, which is now owner by
> freenode-staff. In theory, it should be very easy to get ownership
> back, particularly since we still own #midonet. But in reality, it
> seems like none of the freenode staff feel responsible for these
> requests, so we still aren't owners after requesting it for 3 weeks
> already.
>
> Therefore, Toni Segura suggested we just ditch it and move to
> #openstack-midonet instead.
>
> However, several people have also said we don't need two channels,
> i.e. we should merge #midonet and #midonet-dev.
>
> So, here's three proposals:
>
> Proposal #1:
> * keep #midonet
> * replace #midonet-dev with #openstack-midonet
>
> Proposal #2:
> * keep #midonet
> * merge #midonet-dev into #midonet
>
> Proposal #3:
> * replace both #midonet and #midonet-dev with #openstack-midonet
>
> I don't have any strong feelings for any of the proposals, but suggest
> we go with proposal #2. Traffic in both #midonet and #midonet-dev is
> rather low, so one channel should do - there's way busier OpenStack
> channels out there. Furthermore, #midonet is shorter than
> #openstack-midonet and already established. I also think people will
> rather look in #midonet than #openstack-midonet if they're looking for
> us.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Cheers,
> Sandro
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] IRC: ditch #midonet-dev?

[Antoni Segura Puimedon]

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Ivan Kelly  wrote:

> +1 for #2
>

PS: Beware of the top-posting! It makes vote counting harder ;-)


>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Sandro Mathys 
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Our IRC channels have been neglected for a long time, and as a result
> > we lost ownership of #midonet-dev, which is now owner by
> > freenode-staff. In theory, it should be very easy to get ownership
> > back, particularly since we still own #midonet. But in reality, it
> > seems like none of the freenode staff feel responsible for these
> > requests, so we still aren't owners after requesting it for 3 weeks
> > already.
> >
> > Therefore, Toni Segura suggested we just ditch it and move to
> > #openstack-midonet instead.
> >
> > However, several people have also said we don't need two channels,
> > i.e. we should merge #midonet and #midonet-dev.
> >
> > So, here's three proposals:
> >
> > Proposal #1:
> > * keep #midonet
> > * replace #midonet-dev with #openstack-midonet
> >
> > Proposal #2:
> > * keep #midonet
> > * merge #midonet-dev into #midonet
>

+1


> >
> > Proposal #3:
> > * replace both #midonet and #midonet-dev with #openstack-midonet
> >
> > I don't have any strong feelings for any of the proposals, but suggest
> > we go with proposal #2. Traffic in both #midonet and #midonet-dev is
> > rather low, so one channel should do - there's way busier OpenStack
> > channels out there. Furthermore, #midonet is shorter than
> > #openstack-midonet and already established. I also think people will
> > rather look in #midonet than #openstack-midonet if they're looking for
> > us.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Sandro
> >
> >
> __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] IRC: ditch #midonet-dev?

[Takashi Yamamoto]

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon
 wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Ivan Kelly  wrote:
>>
>> +1 for #2
>
>
> PS: Beware of the top-posting! It makes vote counting harder ;-)
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Sandro Mathys 
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Our IRC channels have been neglected for a long time, and as a result
>> > we lost ownership of #midonet-dev, which is now owner by
>> > freenode-staff. In theory, it should be very easy to get ownership
>> > back, particularly since we still own #midonet. But in reality, it
>> > seems like none of the freenode staff feel responsible for these
>> > requests, so we still aren't owners after requesting it for 3 weeks
>> > already.
>> >
>> > Therefore, Toni Segura suggested we just ditch it and move to
>> > #openstack-midonet instead.
>> >
>> > However, several people have also said we don't need two channels,
>> > i.e. we should merge #midonet and #midonet-dev.
>> >
>> > So, here's three proposals:
>> >
>> > Proposal #1:
>> > * keep #midonet
>> > * replace #midonet-dev with #openstack-midonet
>> >
>> > Proposal #2:
>> > * keep #midonet
>> > * merge #midonet-dev into #midonet
>
>
> +1

+1

>
>>
>> >
>> > Proposal #3:
>> > * replace both #midonet and #midonet-dev with #openstack-midonet
>> >
>> > I don't have any strong feelings for any of the proposals, but suggest
>> > we go with proposal #2. Traffic in both #midonet and #midonet-dev is
>> > rather low, so one channel should do - there's way busier OpenStack
>> > channels out there. Furthermore, #midonet is shorter than
>> > #openstack-midonet and already established. I also think people will
>> > rather look in #midonet than #openstack-midonet if they're looking for
>> > us.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Sandro
>> >
>> >
>> > __
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev