Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][QoS] service-plugin or not discussion

2015-04-28 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
> On 24/4/2015, at 19:42, Armando M. wrote: > > > > On 24 April 2015 at 01:47, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo > wrote: > Hi Armando & Salvatore, > >> On 23/4/2015, at 9:30, Salvatore Orlando > > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 23 April 2015 at 01:30

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][QoS] service-plugin or not discussion

2015-04-24 Thread Armando M.
On 24 April 2015 at 01:47, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > Hi Armando & Salvatore, > > On 23/4/2015, at 9:30, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > > > > On 23 April 2015 at 01:30, Armando M. wrote: > >> >> On 22 April 2015 at 06:02, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][QoS] service-plugin or not discussion

2015-04-24 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
Hi Armando & Salvatore, > On 23/4/2015, at 9:30, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > > > > On 23 April 2015 at 01:30, Armando M. > wrote: > > On 22 April 2015 at 06:02, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo > wrote: > > Hi everybody, > >In the latest Qo

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][QoS] service-plugin or not discussion

2015-04-23 Thread Salvatore Orlando
On 23 April 2015 at 01:30, Armando M. wrote: > > On 22 April 2015 at 06:02, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo > wrote: > >> >> Hi everybody, >> >>In the latest QoS meeting, one of the topics was a discussion about >> how to implement >> QoS [1] either as in core, or as a service plugin, in, or out-tre

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][QoS] service-plugin or not discussion

2015-04-22 Thread Armando M.
On 22 April 2015 at 06:02, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > > Hi everybody, > >In the latest QoS meeting, one of the topics was a discussion about how > to implement > QoS [1] either as in core, or as a service plugin, in, or out-tree. > My apologies if I was unable to join, the meeting clas