Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?
Thanks for your feedback, all! It seems we have a consensus and the route is "(a) dashboard repository per project". I would suggest -dashboard as a repository name where is your main repo name. 2017-04-11 0:09 GMT+09:00 Akihiro Motoki : > Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), > > As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for > neutron stadium projects? > There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying > to add dashboard support. > > I would like to raise this topic again. No dashboard support lands since then. > Also Horizon team would like to move in-tree neutron stadium dashboard > (VPNaaS and FWaaS v1 dashboard) to outside of horizon repo. > > Possible approaches > > > Several possible options in my mind: > (a) dashboard repository per project > (b) dashboard code in individual project > (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects > > Which one sounds better? > > Pros and Cons > > > (a) dashboard repository per project > example, networking-sfc-dashboard repository for networking-sfc > Pros >- Can use existing horizon related project convention and knowledge > (directory structure, testing, translation support) >- Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can > provide its dashboard > support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. > Cons >- An additional repository is needed. > > (b) dashboard code in individual project > example, dashboard module for networking-sfc > Pros: >- No additional repository >- Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can > provide its dashboard > support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. > Cons: >- Requires extra efforts to support neutron and horizon codes in a > single repository > for testing and translation supports. Each project needs to > explore the way. > > (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects >(something like neutron-advanced-dashboard) > Pros: > - No additional repository per project > Each project do not need a basic setup for dashboard and > possible makes things simple. > Cons: > - Inclusion criteria depending on the neutron stadium inclusion/exclusion > (Similar discussion happens as for neutronclient OSC plugin) > Project before neutron stadium inclusion may need another > implementation. > > > My vote is (a) or (c) (to avoid mixing neutron and dashboard codes in a repo). > > Note that as dashboard supports for feature in the main neutron repository > are implemented in the horizon repository as we discussed several months ago. > As an example, trunk support is being development in the horizon repo. > > Thanks, > Akihiro __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?
Hi TIm, I think no user-visible changes happen for users. Do you have any example in your mind? I understand horizon lacks supports of some hooks (such as adding a menu to an existing table). If there are missing things, 2017-04-12 2:24 GMT+09:00 Tim Bell : > Are there any implications for the end user experience by going to different > repos (such as requiring dedicated menu items)? > > > > Tim > > > > From: "Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw)" > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Date: Tuesday, 11 April 2017 at 17:01 > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where > would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects? > > > > Hi All: > > > > From and FWaaS perspective – we also think (a) would be ideal. > > > > Thanks > > > > Sridar > > > > From: Kevin Benton > Reply-To: OpenStack List > Date: Monday, April 10, 2017 at 4:20 PM > To: OpenStack List > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where > would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects? > > > > I think 'a' is probably the way to go since we can mainly rely on existing > horizon guides for creating new dashboard repos. > > > > On Apr 10, 2017 08:11, "Akihiro Motoki" wrote: > > Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), > > As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for > neutron stadium projects? > There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying > to add dashboard support. > > I would like to raise this topic again. No dashboard support lands since > then. > Also Horizon team would like to move in-tree neutron stadium dashboard > (VPNaaS and FWaaS v1 dashboard) to outside of horizon repo. > > Possible approaches > > > Several possible options in my mind: > (a) dashboard repository per project > (b) dashboard code in individual project > (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects > > Which one sounds better? > > Pros and Cons > > > (a) dashboard repository per project > example, networking-sfc-dashboard repository for networking-sfc > Pros >- Can use existing horizon related project convention and knowledge > (directory structure, testing, translation support) >- Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can > provide its dashboard > support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. > Cons >- An additional repository is needed. > > (b) dashboard code in individual project > example, dashboard module for networking-sfc > Pros: >- No additional repository >- Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can > provide its dashboard > support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. > Cons: >- Requires extra efforts to support neutron and horizon codes in a > single repository > for testing and translation supports. Each project needs to > explore the way. > > (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects >(something like neutron-advanced-dashboard) > Pros: > - No additional repository per project > Each project do not need a basic setup for dashboard and > possible makes things simple. > Cons: > - Inclusion criteria depending on the neutron stadium > inclusion/exclusion > (Similar discussion happens as for neutronclient OSC plugin) > Project before neutron stadium inclusion may need another > implementation. > > > My vote is (a) or (c) (to avoid mixing neutron and dashboard codes in a > repo). > > Note that as dashboard supports for feature in the main neutron repository > are implemented in the horizon repository as we discussed several months > ago. > As an example, trunk support is being development in the horizon repo. > > Thanks, > Akihiro > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?
Hi, > I think (a) is also good from TaaS dashboard. This opinion is agreed as a TaaS project. Regards, Kaz From: "SUZUKI, Kazuhiro" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects? Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:19:42 +0900 (JST) > Hi, > > I think (a) is also good from TaaS dashboard. > > Regards, > Kaz > > > From: Akihiro Motoki > Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we > like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects? > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:09:10 +0900 > >> Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), >> >> As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for >> neutron stadium projects? >> There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying >> to add dashboard support. >> >> I would like to raise this topic again. No dashboard support lands since >> then. >> Also Horizon team would like to move in-tree neutron stadium dashboard >> (VPNaaS and FWaaS v1 dashboard) to outside of horizon repo. >> >> Possible approaches >> >> >> Several possible options in my mind: >> (a) dashboard repository per project >> (b) dashboard code in individual project >> (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects >> >> Which one sounds better? >> >> Pros and Cons >> >> >> (a) dashboard repository per project >> example, networking-sfc-dashboard repository for networking-sfc >> Pros >>- Can use existing horizon related project convention and knowledge >> (directory structure, testing, translation support) >>- Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can >> provide its dashboard >> support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. >> Cons >>- An additional repository is needed. >> >> (b) dashboard code in individual project >> example, dashboard module for networking-sfc >> Pros: >>- No additional repository >>- Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can >> provide its dashboard >> support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. >> Cons: >>- Requires extra efforts to support neutron and horizon codes in a >> single repository >> for testing and translation supports. Each project needs to >> explore the way. >> >> (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects >>(something like neutron-advanced-dashboard) >> Pros: >> - No additional repository per project >> Each project do not need a basic setup for dashboard and >> possible makes things simple. >> Cons: >> - Inclusion criteria depending on the neutron stadium inclusion/exclusion >> (Similar discussion happens as for neutronclient OSC plugin) >> Project before neutron stadium inclusion may need another >> implementation. >> >> >> My vote is (a) or (c) (to avoid mixing neutron and dashboard codes in a >> repo). >> >> Note that as dashboard supports for feature in the main neutron repository >> are implemented in the horizon repository as we discussed several months ago. >> As an example, trunk support is being development in the horizon repo. >> >> Thanks, >> Akihiro >> >> __ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?
Hi, I think (a) is also good from TaaS dashboard. Regards, Kaz From: Akihiro Motoki Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects? Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:09:10 +0900 > Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), > > As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for > neutron stadium projects? > There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying > to add dashboard support. > > I would like to raise this topic again. No dashboard support lands since then. > Also Horizon team would like to move in-tree neutron stadium dashboard > (VPNaaS and FWaaS v1 dashboard) to outside of horizon repo. > > Possible approaches > > > Several possible options in my mind: > (a) dashboard repository per project > (b) dashboard code in individual project > (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects > > Which one sounds better? > > Pros and Cons > > > (a) dashboard repository per project > example, networking-sfc-dashboard repository for networking-sfc > Pros >- Can use existing horizon related project convention and knowledge > (directory structure, testing, translation support) >- Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can > provide its dashboard > support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. > Cons >- An additional repository is needed. > > (b) dashboard code in individual project > example, dashboard module for networking-sfc > Pros: >- No additional repository >- Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can > provide its dashboard > support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. > Cons: >- Requires extra efforts to support neutron and horizon codes in a > single repository > for testing and translation supports. Each project needs to > explore the way. > > (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects >(something like neutron-advanced-dashboard) > Pros: > - No additional repository per project > Each project do not need a basic setup for dashboard and > possible makes things simple. > Cons: > - Inclusion criteria depending on the neutron stadium inclusion/exclusion > (Similar discussion happens as for neutronclient OSC plugin) > Project before neutron stadium inclusion may need another > implementation. > > > My vote is (a) or (c) (to avoid mixing neutron and dashboard codes in a repo). > > Note that as dashboard supports for feature in the main neutron repository > are implemented in the horizon repository as we discussed several months ago. > As an example, trunk support is being development in the horizon repo. > > Thanks, > Akihiro > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?
Are there any implications for the end user experience by going to different repos (such as requiring dedicated menu items)? Tim From: "Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw)" Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Tuesday, 11 April 2017 at 17:01 To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects? Hi All: From and FWaaS perspective – we also think (a) would be ideal. Thanks Sridar From: Kevin Benton mailto:ke...@benton.pub>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Monday, April 10, 2017 at 4:20 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects? I think 'a' is probably the way to go since we can mainly rely on existing horizon guides for creating new dashboard repos. On Apr 10, 2017 08:11, "Akihiro Motoki" mailto:amot...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects? There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying to add dashboard support. I would like to raise this topic again. No dashboard support lands since then. Also Horizon team would like to move in-tree neutron stadium dashboard (VPNaaS and FWaaS v1 dashboard) to outside of horizon repo. Possible approaches Several possible options in my mind: (a) dashboard repository per project (b) dashboard code in individual project (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects Which one sounds better? Pros and Cons (a) dashboard repository per project example, networking-sfc-dashboard repository for networking-sfc Pros - Can use existing horizon related project convention and knowledge (directory structure, testing, translation support) - Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can provide its dashboard support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. Cons - An additional repository is needed. (b) dashboard code in individual project example, dashboard module for networking-sfc Pros: - No additional repository - Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can provide its dashboard support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. Cons: - Requires extra efforts to support neutron and horizon codes in a single repository for testing and translation supports. Each project needs to explore the way. (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects (something like neutron-advanced-dashboard) Pros: - No additional repository per project Each project do not need a basic setup for dashboard and possible makes things simple. Cons: - Inclusion criteria depending on the neutron stadium inclusion/exclusion (Similar discussion happens as for neutronclient OSC plugin) Project before neutron stadium inclusion may need another implementation. My vote is (a) or (c) (to avoid mixing neutron and dashboard codes in a repo). Note that as dashboard supports for feature in the main neutron repository are implemented in the horizon repository as we discussed several months ago. As an example, trunk support is being development in the horizon repo. Thanks, Akihiro __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?
Akihiro, Option (a) would have my vote. - Louis -Original Message- From: Akihiro Motoki [mailto:amot...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 8:09 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects? Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects? There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying to add dashboard support. I would like to raise this topic again. No dashboard support lands since then. Also Horizon team would like to move in-tree neutron stadium dashboard (VPNaaS and FWaaS v1 dashboard) to outside of horizon repo. Possible approaches Several possible options in my mind: (a) dashboard repository per project (b) dashboard code in individual project (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects Which one sounds better? Pros and Cons (a) dashboard repository per project example, networking-sfc-dashboard repository for networking-sfc Pros - Can use existing horizon related project convention and knowledge (directory structure, testing, translation support) - Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can provide its dashboard support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. Cons - An additional repository is needed. (b) dashboard code in individual project example, dashboard module for networking-sfc Pros: - No additional repository - Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can provide its dashboard support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. Cons: - Requires extra efforts to support neutron and horizon codes in a single repository for testing and translation supports. Each project needs to explore the way. (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects (something like neutron-advanced-dashboard) Pros: - No additional repository per project Each project do not need a basic setup for dashboard and possible makes things simple. Cons: - Inclusion criteria depending on the neutron stadium inclusion/exclusion (Similar discussion happens as for neutronclient OSC plugin) Project before neutron stadium inclusion may need another implementation. My vote is (a) or (c) (to avoid mixing neutron and dashboard codes in a repo). Note that as dashboard supports for feature in the main neutron repository are implemented in the horizon repository as we discussed several months ago. As an example, trunk support is being development in the horizon repo. Thanks, Akihiro __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?
Hi All: >From and FWaaS perspective - we also think (a) would be ideal. Thanks Sridar From: Kevin Benton mailto:ke...@benton.pub>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Monday, April 10, 2017 at 4:20 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects? I think 'a' is probably the way to go since we can mainly rely on existing horizon guides for creating new dashboard repos. On Apr 10, 2017 08:11, "Akihiro Motoki" mailto:amot...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects? There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying to add dashboard support. I would like to raise this topic again. No dashboard support lands since then. Also Horizon team would like to move in-tree neutron stadium dashboard (VPNaaS and FWaaS v1 dashboard) to outside of horizon repo. Possible approaches Several possible options in my mind: (a) dashboard repository per project (b) dashboard code in individual project (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects Which one sounds better? Pros and Cons (a) dashboard repository per project example, networking-sfc-dashboard repository for networking-sfc Pros - Can use existing horizon related project convention and knowledge (directory structure, testing, translation support) - Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can provide its dashboard support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. Cons - An additional repository is needed. (b) dashboard code in individual project example, dashboard module for networking-sfc Pros: - No additional repository - Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can provide its dashboard support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. Cons: - Requires extra efforts to support neutron and horizon codes in a single repository for testing and translation supports. Each project needs to explore the way. (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects (something like neutron-advanced-dashboard) Pros: - No additional repository per project Each project do not need a basic setup for dashboard and possible makes things simple. Cons: - Inclusion criteria depending on the neutron stadium inclusion/exclusion (Similar discussion happens as for neutronclient OSC plugin) Project before neutron stadium inclusion may need another implementation. My vote is (a) or (c) (to avoid mixing neutron and dashboard codes in a repo). Note that as dashboard supports for feature in the main neutron repository are implemented in the horizon repository as we discussed several months ago. As an example, trunk support is being development in the horizon repo. Thanks, Akihiro __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?
I think 'a' is probably the way to go since we can mainly rely on existing horizon guides for creating new dashboard repos. On Apr 10, 2017 08:11, "Akihiro Motoki" wrote: > Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), > > As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for > neutron stadium projects? > There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying > to add dashboard support. > > I would like to raise this topic again. No dashboard support lands since > then. > Also Horizon team would like to move in-tree neutron stadium dashboard > (VPNaaS and FWaaS v1 dashboard) to outside of horizon repo. > > Possible approaches > > > Several possible options in my mind: > (a) dashboard repository per project > (b) dashboard code in individual project > (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects > > Which one sounds better? > > Pros and Cons > > > (a) dashboard repository per project > example, networking-sfc-dashboard repository for networking-sfc > Pros >- Can use existing horizon related project convention and knowledge > (directory structure, testing, translation support) >- Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can > provide its dashboard > support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. > Cons >- An additional repository is needed. > > (b) dashboard code in individual project > example, dashboard module for networking-sfc > Pros: >- No additional repository >- Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can > provide its dashboard > support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. > Cons: >- Requires extra efforts to support neutron and horizon codes in a > single repository > for testing and translation supports. Each project needs to > explore the way. > > (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects >(something like neutron-advanced-dashboard) > Pros: > - No additional repository per project > Each project do not need a basic setup for dashboard and > possible makes things simple. > Cons: > - Inclusion criteria depending on the neutron stadium > inclusion/exclusion > (Similar discussion happens as for neutronclient OSC plugin) > Project before neutron stadium inclusion may need another > implementation. > > > My vote is (a) or (c) (to avoid mixing neutron and dashboard codes in a > repo). > > Note that as dashboard supports for feature in the main neutron repository > are implemented in the horizon repository as we discussed several months > ago. > As an example, trunk support is being development in the horizon repo. > > Thanks, > Akihiro > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?
Excerpts from Akihiro Motoki's message of 2017-04-11 00:09:10 +0900: > Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), > > As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for > neutron stadium projects? > There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying > to add dashboard support. > > I would like to raise this topic again. No dashboard support lands since then. > Also Horizon team would like to move in-tree neutron stadium dashboard > (VPNaaS and FWaaS v1 dashboard) to outside of horizon repo. > > Possible approaches > > > Several possible options in my mind: > (a) dashboard repository per project > (b) dashboard code in individual project > (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects > > Which one sounds better? > > Pros and Cons > > > (a) dashboard repository per project > example, networking-sfc-dashboard repository for networking-sfc > Pros >- Can use existing horizon related project convention and knowledge > (directory structure, testing, translation support) >- Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can > provide its dashboard > support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. > Cons >- An additional repository is needed. > > (b) dashboard code in individual project > example, dashboard module for networking-sfc > Pros: >- No additional repository >- Not related to the neutron stadium inclusion. Each project can > provide its dashboard > support regardless of neutron stadium inclusion. > Cons: >- Requires extra efforts to support neutron and horizon codes in a > single repository > for testing and translation supports. Each project needs to > explore the way. > > (c) a single dashboard repository for all neutron stadium projects >(something like neutron-advanced-dashboard) > Pros: > - No additional repository per project > Each project do not need a basic setup for dashboard and > possible makes things simple. > Cons: > - Inclusion criteria depending on the neutron stadium inclusion/exclusion > (Similar discussion happens as for neutronclient OSC plugin) > Project before neutron stadium inclusion may need another > implementation. > > > My vote is (a) or (c) (to avoid mixing neutron and dashboard codes in a repo). > > Note that as dashboard supports for feature in the main neutron repository > are implemented in the horizon repository as we discussed several months ago. > As an example, trunk support is being development in the horizon repo. > > Thanks, > Akihiro > From the release team's perspective, we would prefer (a), because having one deliverable per package simplifies packaging and makes more sense for deployments (no one would end up with dashboard panels for features not supported by the backend). Doug __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev