Hi Yamamoto,
Thanks for resuming work on this effort. TAP-as-a-service is a very
important feature, and great to see we are considering use case scenarios
and adjusting APIs accordingly. I have some thoughts on the use case
scenarios, which are seen as most common ones, when talking to operators.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Takashi Yamamoto
wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Vikram Hosakote (vhosakot)
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > TAAS looks great for traffic monitoring.
> >
> > Some questions about TAAS.
> >
> > 1) Can TAAS be
hi,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Vikram Hosakote (vhosakot)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> TAAS looks great for traffic monitoring.
>
> Some questions about TAAS.
>
> 1) Can TAAS be used for provider networks as well, or just for tenant
> networks ?
currently only for VM ports on
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have no idea why the link is broken.
probabaly meeting_id given to #startmeeting was wrong?
>
> today's meeting log is here:
>
Sounds interesting! I'd like to look at some past meeting logs (including from
today), but the 'past meetings' link at
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Tap_as_a_Service_Meeting does not work for me.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Takashi Yamamoto [mailto:yamam...@midokura.com]
Hi,
TAAS looks great for traffic monitoring.
Some questions about TAAS.
1) Can TAAS be used for provider networks as well, or just for tenant
networks ?
2) Will there be any performance impact is every neutron port and every
packet is mirrored/duplicated ?
3) How is TAAS better than a
hi,
i have no idea why the link is broken.
today's meeting log is here:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tap_as_a_service_meeting/2015/tap_as_a_service_meeting.2015-11-11-06.36.html
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Sounds interesting!