Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] VPNaaS Subteam meetings

2015-03-10 Thread Paul Michali
Given the votes so far, the proposal is to move the meeting time to 1600
UTC on Tuesday. The channel is openstack-meeting-3 (as the only one
available).

In addition, the meeting will be on-demand, so if you want to have a
meeting, send email to this mailing list, at least 24 hours before the
meeting, and update the agenda on the wiki with the topic(s) you want to
discuss and the date of the meeting being requested.

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/VPNaaS

Regards,

PCM (Paul Michali)

IRC pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
Twitter... @pmichali


On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:

 I guess I'll vote for (D), so that there is the possibility of early (1400
 UTC) and late (2100) on alternating weeks, given we don't have much to
 discuss lately and then changing to (C), if things pick up.

 Let's discuss at Tuesday's meeting (note DST change for US folks), at 1500
 UTC.



 PCM (Paul Michali)

 IRC pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
 Twitter... @pmichali


 On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Joshua Zhang joshua.zh...@canonical.com
 wrote:

 Hi all,

 I would also vote for (A) with 1500 UTC which is 23:00 in Beijing
 time -:)

 On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Mohammad Hanif mha...@brocade.com
 wrote:

   Hi all,

  I would also vote for (C) with 1600 UTC or later.  This  will
 hopefully increase more participation from the Pacific time zone.

  Thanks,
 —Hanif.

   From: Mathieu Rohon
 Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Date: Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 1:52 AM
 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] VPNaaS Subteam meetings

 Hi,

  I'm fine with C) and 1600 UTC would be more adapted for EU time Zone :)

  However, I Agree that neutron-vpnaas meetings was mainly focus on
 maintaining the current IPSec implementation, by managing the slip out,
 adding StrongSwan support and adding functional tests.
  Maybe we will get a broader audience once we will speak about adding
 new use cases such as edge-vpn.
  Edge-vpn use cases overlap with the Telco WG VPN use case [1]. May be
 those edge-vpn discussions should occur during the Telco WG meeting?

 [1]
 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TelcoWorkingGroup/UseCases#VPN_Instantiation

 On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy sric...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hi Paul.

  I'd vote for (C) and a slightly later time-slot on Tuesdays - 1630
 UTC (or later).

  The meetings so far was indeed quite useful. I guess the current busy
 Kilo cycle is also contributing to the low turnout. As we pick up things
 going forward this forum will be quite useful to discuss edge-vpn and,
 perhaps, other vpn variants.

  - Sridhar

  On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:

  Hi all! The email, that I sent on 2/24 didn't make it to the mailing
 list (no wonder I didn't get responses!). I think I had an issue with my
 email address used - sorry for the confusion!

  So, I'll hold the meeting today (1500 UTC meeting-4, if it is still
 available), and we can discuss this...


  We've been having very low turnout for meetings for the past several
 weeks, so I'd like to ask those in the community interested in VPNaaS, 
 what
 the preference would be regarding meetings...

  A) hold at the same day/time, but only on-demand.
 B) hold at a different day/time.
 C) hold at a different day/time, but only on-demand.
 D) hold as a on-demand topic in main Neutron meeting.

  Please vote your interest, and provide desired day/time, if you pick
 B or C. The fallback will be (D), if there's not much interest anymore for
 meeting, or we can't seem to come to a consensus (or super-majority :)

  Regards,

  PCM

  Twitter: @pmichali
 TEXT: 6032894458
 PCM (Paul Michali)

  IRC pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
 Twitter... @pmichali



 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




 --
 Best Regards
 Zhang Hua(张华)
 Software Engineer | Canonical
 IRC:  zhhuabj

 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] VPNaaS Subteam meetings

2015-03-09 Thread Paul Michali
I guess I'll vote for (D), so that there is the possibility of early (1400
UTC) and late (2100) on alternating weeks, given we don't have much to
discuss lately and then changing to (C), if things pick up.

Let's discuss at Tuesday's meeting (note DST change for US folks), at 1500
UTC.



PCM (Paul Michali)

IRC pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
Twitter... @pmichali


On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Joshua Zhang joshua.zh...@canonical.com
wrote:

 Hi all,

 I would also vote for (A) with 1500 UTC which is 23:00 in Beijing time
 -:)

 On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Mohammad Hanif mha...@brocade.com wrote:

   Hi all,

  I would also vote for (C) with 1600 UTC or later.  This  will hopefully
 increase more participation from the Pacific time zone.

  Thanks,
 —Hanif.

   From: Mathieu Rohon
 Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Date: Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 1:52 AM
 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] VPNaaS Subteam meetings

 Hi,

  I'm fine with C) and 1600 UTC would be more adapted for EU time Zone :)

  However, I Agree that neutron-vpnaas meetings was mainly focus on
 maintaining the current IPSec implementation, by managing the slip out,
 adding StrongSwan support and adding functional tests.
  Maybe we will get a broader audience once we will speak about adding new
 use cases such as edge-vpn.
  Edge-vpn use cases overlap with the Telco WG VPN use case [1]. May be
 those edge-vpn discussions should occur during the Telco WG meeting?

 [1]
 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TelcoWorkingGroup/UseCases#VPN_Instantiation

 On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy sric...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hi Paul.

  I'd vote for (C) and a slightly later time-slot on Tuesdays - 1630 UTC
 (or later).

  The meetings so far was indeed quite useful. I guess the current busy
 Kilo cycle is also contributing to the low turnout. As we pick up things
 going forward this forum will be quite useful to discuss edge-vpn and,
 perhaps, other vpn variants.

  - Sridhar

  On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:

  Hi all! The email, that I sent on 2/24 didn't make it to the mailing
 list (no wonder I didn't get responses!). I think I had an issue with my
 email address used - sorry for the confusion!

  So, I'll hold the meeting today (1500 UTC meeting-4, if it is still
 available), and we can discuss this...


  We've been having very low turnout for meetings for the past several
 weeks, so I'd like to ask those in the community interested in VPNaaS, what
 the preference would be regarding meetings...

  A) hold at the same day/time, but only on-demand.
 B) hold at a different day/time.
 C) hold at a different day/time, but only on-demand.
 D) hold as a on-demand topic in main Neutron meeting.

  Please vote your interest, and provide desired day/time, if you pick
 B or C. The fallback will be (D), if there's not much interest anymore for
 meeting, or we can't seem to come to a consensus (or super-majority :)

  Regards,

  PCM

  Twitter: @pmichali
 TEXT: 6032894458
 PCM (Paul Michali)

  IRC pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
 Twitter... @pmichali



 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




 --
 Best Regards
 Zhang Hua(张华)
 Software Engineer | Canonical
 IRC:  zhhuabj

 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] VPNaaS Subteam meetings

2015-03-05 Thread Mathieu Rohon
Hi,

I'm fine with C) and 1600 UTC would be more adapted for EU time Zone :)

However, I Agree that neutron-vpnaas meetings was mainly focus on
maintaining the current IPSec implementation, by managing the slip out,
adding StrongSwan support and adding functional tests.
Maybe we will get a broader audience once we will speak about adding new
use cases such as edge-vpn.
Edge-vpn use cases overlap with the Telco WG VPN use case [1]. May be those
edge-vpn discussions should occur during the Telco WG meeting?

[1]
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TelcoWorkingGroup/UseCases#VPN_Instantiation

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy sric...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Paul.

 I'd vote for (C) and a slightly later time-slot on Tuesdays - 1630 UTC (or
 later).

 The meetings so far was indeed quite useful. I guess the current busy Kilo
 cycle is also contributing to the low turnout. As we pick up things going
 forward this forum will be quite useful to discuss edge-vpn and, perhaps,
 other vpn variants.

 - Sridhar

 On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:

 Hi all! The email, that I sent on 2/24 didn't make it to the mailing list
 (no wonder I didn't get responses!). I think I had an issue with my email
 address used - sorry for the confusion!

 So, I'll hold the meeting today (1500 UTC meeting-4, if it is still
 available), and we can discuss this...


 We've been having very low turnout for meetings for the past several
 weeks, so I'd like to ask those in the community interested in VPNaaS, what
 the preference would be regarding meetings...

 A) hold at the same day/time, but only on-demand.
 B) hold at a different day/time.
 C) hold at a different day/time, but only on-demand.
 D) hold as a on-demand topic in main Neutron meeting.

 Please vote your interest, and provide desired day/time, if you pick B or
 C. The fallback will be (D), if there's not much interest anymore for
 meeting, or we can't seem to come to a consensus (or super-majority :)

 Regards,

 PCM

 Twitter: @pmichali
 TEXT: 6032894458
 PCM (Paul Michali)

 IRC pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
 Twitter... @pmichali


 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] VPNaaS Subteam meetings

2015-03-05 Thread Joshua Zhang
Hi all,

I would also vote for (A) with 1500 UTC which is 23:00 in Beijing time
-:)

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Mohammad Hanif mha...@brocade.com wrote:

   Hi all,

  I would also vote for (C) with 1600 UTC or later.  This  will hopefully
 increase more participation from the Pacific time zone.

  Thanks,
 —Hanif.

   From: Mathieu Rohon
 Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Date: Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 1:52 AM
 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] VPNaaS Subteam meetings

 Hi,

  I'm fine with C) and 1600 UTC would be more adapted for EU time Zone :)

  However, I Agree that neutron-vpnaas meetings was mainly focus on
 maintaining the current IPSec implementation, by managing the slip out,
 adding StrongSwan support and adding functional tests.
  Maybe we will get a broader audience once we will speak about adding new
 use cases such as edge-vpn.
  Edge-vpn use cases overlap with the Telco WG VPN use case [1]. May be
 those edge-vpn discussions should occur during the Telco WG meeting?

 [1]
 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TelcoWorkingGroup/UseCases#VPN_Instantiation

 On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy sric...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hi Paul.

  I'd vote for (C) and a slightly later time-slot on Tuesdays - 1630 UTC
 (or later).

  The meetings so far was indeed quite useful. I guess the current busy
 Kilo cycle is also contributing to the low turnout. As we pick up things
 going forward this forum will be quite useful to discuss edge-vpn and,
 perhaps, other vpn variants.

  - Sridhar

  On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:

  Hi all! The email, that I sent on 2/24 didn't make it to the mailing
 list (no wonder I didn't get responses!). I think I had an issue with my
 email address used - sorry for the confusion!

  So, I'll hold the meeting today (1500 UTC meeting-4, if it is still
 available), and we can discuss this...


  We've been having very low turnout for meetings for the past several
 weeks, so I'd like to ask those in the community interested in VPNaaS, what
 the preference would be regarding meetings...

  A) hold at the same day/time, but only on-demand.
 B) hold at a different day/time.
 C) hold at a different day/time, but only on-demand.
 D) hold as a on-demand topic in main Neutron meeting.

  Please vote your interest, and provide desired day/time, if you pick B
 or C. The fallback will be (D), if there's not much interest anymore for
 meeting, or we can't seem to come to a consensus (or super-majority :)

  Regards,

  PCM

  Twitter: @pmichali
 TEXT: 6032894458
 PCM (Paul Michali)

  IRC pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
 Twitter... @pmichali



 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




-- 
Best Regards
Zhang Hua(张华)
Software Engineer | Canonical
IRC:  zhhuabj
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] VPNaaS Subteam meetings

2015-03-05 Thread Mohammad Hanif
Hi all,

I would also vote for (C) with 1600 UTC or later.  This  will hopefully 
increase more participation from the Pacific time zone.

Thanks,
—Hanif.

From: Mathieu Rohon
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Date: Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 1:52 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] VPNaaS Subteam meetings

Hi,

I'm fine with C) and 1600 UTC would be more adapted for EU time Zone :)

However, I Agree that neutron-vpnaas meetings was mainly focus on maintaining 
the current IPSec implementation, by managing the slip out, adding StrongSwan 
support and adding functional tests.
Maybe we will get a broader audience once we will speak about adding new use 
cases such as edge-vpn.
Edge-vpn use cases overlap with the Telco WG VPN use case [1]. May be those 
edge-vpn discussions should occur during the Telco WG meeting?

[1]https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TelcoWorkingGroup/UseCases#VPN_Instantiation

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy 
sric...@gmail.commailto:sric...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul.

I'd vote for (C) and a slightly later time-slot on Tuesdays - 1630 UTC (or 
later).

The meetings so far was indeed quite useful. I guess the current busy Kilo 
cycle is also contributing to the low turnout. As we pick up things going 
forward this forum will be quite useful to discuss edge-vpn and, perhaps, other 
vpn variants.

- Sridhar

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Paul Michali 
p...@michali.netmailto:p...@michali.net wrote:
Hi all! The email, that I sent on 2/24 didn't make it to the mailing list (no 
wonder I didn't get responses!). I think I had an issue with my email address 
used - sorry for the confusion!

So, I'll hold the meeting today (1500 UTC meeting-4, if it is still available), 
and we can discuss this...


We've been having very low turnout for meetings for the past several weeks, so 
I'd like to ask those in the community interested in VPNaaS, what the 
preference would be regarding meetings...

A) hold at the same day/time, but only on-demand.
B) hold at a different day/time.
C) hold at a different day/time, but only on-demand.
D) hold as a on-demand topic in main Neutron meeting.

Please vote your interest, and provide desired day/time, if you pick B or C. 
The fallback will be (D), if there's not much interest anymore for meeting, or 
we can't seem to come to a consensus (or super-majority :)

Regards,

PCM

Twitter: @pmichali
TEXT: 6032894458tel:6032894458
PCM (Paul Michali)

IRC pc_m (irc.freenode.comhttp://irc.freenode.com)
Twitter... @pmichali


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] VPNaaS Subteam meetings

2015-03-04 Thread Sridhar Ramaswamy
Hi Paul.

I'd vote for (C) and a slightly later time-slot on Tuesdays - 1630 UTC (or
later).

The meetings so far was indeed quite useful. I guess the current busy Kilo
cycle is also contributing to the low turnout. As we pick up things going
forward this forum will be quite useful to discuss edge-vpn and, perhaps,
other vpn variants.

- Sridhar

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:

 Hi all! The email, that I sent on 2/24 didn't make it to the mailing list
 (no wonder I didn't get responses!). I think I had an issue with my email
 address used - sorry for the confusion!

 So, I'll hold the meeting today (1500 UTC meeting-4, if it is still
 available), and we can discuss this...


 We've been having very low turnout for meetings for the past several
 weeks, so I'd like to ask those in the community interested in VPNaaS, what
 the preference would be regarding meetings...

 A) hold at the same day/time, but only on-demand.
 B) hold at a different day/time.
 C) hold at a different day/time, but only on-demand.
 D) hold as a on-demand topic in main Neutron meeting.

 Please vote your interest, and provide desired day/time, if you pick B or
 C. The fallback will be (D), if there's not much interest anymore for
 meeting, or we can't seem to come to a consensus (or super-majority :)

 Regards,

 PCM

 Twitter: @pmichali
 TEXT: 6032894458
 PCM (Paul Michali)

 IRC pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
 Twitter... @pmichali


 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev