Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-20 Thread Salvatore Orlando
On 20 November 2014 02:19, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, Like Ian, I am jumping in this very late as well - as I decided to travel Europe after the summit, just returned back and catching up :-):-) I have noticed that this thread has gotten fairly convoluted and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-20 Thread Ian Wells
On 19 November 2014 17:19, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, Like Ian, I am jumping in this very late as well - as I decided to travel Europe after the summit, just returned back and catching up :-):-) I have noticed that this thread has gotten fairly convoluted and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-20 Thread Armando M.
Hi Sukhdev, Hope you enjoyed Europe ;) On 19 November 2014 17:19, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, Like Ian, I am jumping in this very late as well - as I decided to travel Europe after the summit, just returned back and catching up :-):-) I have noticed that this

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-20 Thread Armando M.
On 20 November 2014 02:08, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: On 20 November 2014 02:19, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, Like Ian, I am jumping in this very late as well - as I decided to travel Europe after the summit, just returned back and catching up

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-18 Thread Ian Wells
Sorry I'm a bit late to this, but that's what you get from being on holiday... (Which is also why there are no new MTU and VLAN specs yet, but I swear I'll get to them.) On 17 November 2014 01:13, Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Armando M.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-18 Thread Armando M.
Hi, On 18 November 2014 16:22, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote: Sorry I'm a bit late to this, but that's what you get from being on holiday... (Which is also why there are no new MTU and VLAN specs yet, but I swear I'll get to them.) Ah! I hope it was good at least :) On 17

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-17 Thread Mathieu Rohon
Hi On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote: Last Friday I recall we had two discussions around this topic. One in the morning, which I think led to Maruti to push [1]. The way I understood [1] was that it is an attempt at unifying [2] and [3], by choosing the API

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-17 Thread Doug Wiegley
On Nov 17, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote: Last Friday I recall we had two discussions around this topic. One in the morning, which I think led to Maruti to push [1]. The way I

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-17 Thread Salvatore Orlando
I think this thread is about the L2 gateway service... how's that related with the notion of trunk port? I know that the spec under review adds a component which is tantamount to a L2 gateway, but while the functionality is similar, the use case, and therefore the API exposed, are rather

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-17 Thread Isaku Yamahata
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:13:50AM +0100, Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hi. On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote: Last Friday I recall we had two discussions around this topic. One in the morning, which I think led to Maruti to push [1].

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-17 Thread Doug Wiegley
Sorry, it's early, I was being imprecise and using trunk to mean, methods to connect x to a neutron (l2 segment. Doug On Nov 17, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.commailto:sorla...@nicira.com wrote: I think this thread is about the L2 gateway service... how's that related

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-17 Thread Igor Cardoso
What would be the best meeting to discuss these works and any others related? Maybe, collectively, a very flexible solution for all related use cases could be found. I also want to go forward with some work I've developed a couple months ago, part of methods to connect x to a neutron l2 segment,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-17 Thread Armando M.
On 17 November 2014 01:13, Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote: Last Friday I recall we had two discussions around this topic. One in the morning, which I think led to Maruti to push [1]. The way I understood

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-14 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Thanks Maruti, I have some comments and questions which I've posted on gerrit. There are two things I would like to discuss on the mailing list concerning this effort. 1) Is this spec replacing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100278 and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93613 - I hope so,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-14 Thread Mathieu Rohon
Hi, As far as I understood last friday afternoon dicussions during the design summit, this use case is in the scope of another umbrella spec which would define external connectivity for neutron networks. Details of those connectivity would be defined through service plugin API. Ian do you plan

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-14 Thread Igor Cardoso
Hello all, Also, what about Kevin's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/87825/? One of its use cases is exactly the L2 gateway. These proposals could probably be inserted in a more generic work for moving existing datacenter L2 resources to Neutron. Cheers, On 14 November 2014 15:28, Mathieu Rohon

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-14 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Thanks guys. I think you've answered my initial question. Probably not in the way I was hoping it to be answered, but it's ok. So now we have potentially 4 different blueprint describing more or less overlapping use cases that we need to reconcile into one? If the above is correct, then I

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-14 Thread Narasimhan, Vivekanandan
: Salvatore Orlando [mailto:sorla...@nicira.com] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 10:17 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service Thanks guys. I think you've answered my initial question. Probably

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] L2 gateway as a service

2014-11-14 Thread Armando M.
Last Friday I recall we had two discussions around this topic. One in the morning, which I think led to Maruti to push [1]. The way I understood [1] was that it is an attempt at unifying [2] and [3], by choosing the API approach of one and the architectural approach of the other. [1]