Hi,
The general discussion is going in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148318/.
My opinions on the following specific topics inline.
2015-02-18 0:04 GMT+09:00 Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
response was huge so far :) so to add more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2015 04:19 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
My opinions inline.
On 17 February 2015 at 16:04, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
mailto:ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
response was huge so far :) so to add more traction, I have a
My opinions inline.
On 17 February 2015 at 16:04, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
response was huge so far :) so to add more traction, I have a question
for everyone. Let's assume we want to move entry points for all
services
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
response was huge so far :) so to add more traction, I have a question
for everyone. Let's assume we want to move entry points for all
services and agents into neutron/cmd/... If so,
- - Do we want all existing tools stored in the path to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/13/2015 02:33 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
Why did the services fail with the stdlib patched? Are they
incompatible with eventlet?
It's not like *service entry points* are not ready for neutron.* to be
monkey patched, but tools around it (flake8
Why did the services fail with the stdlib patched? Are they incompatible
with eventlet?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
there were some moves recently to make monkey patching strategy sane