...@leafe.com]
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 10:59 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] [gantt] Please stop using
Gantt for discussing about Nova scheduler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/03/2015 11:42 AM, Dugger, Donald D
AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] [gantt] Please stop using
Gantt for discussing about Nova scheduler
Gantt is a dead and abandoned source tree, it also means nothing to new people
joining into helping with the nova scheduler. It keeps
@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] [gantt] Please stop using
Gantt for discussing about Nova scheduler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/03/2015 11:42 AM, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
Yes the current effort is to clean up the scheduler interfaces
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/03/2015 11:42 AM, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
Yes the current effort is to clean up the scheduler interfaces but
one of the main goals of that clean up is to make it possible to
then split out the scheduler to a separate project. I don't want
On 04/03/2015 12:59 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On 04/03/2015 11:42 AM, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
Yes the current effort is to clean up the scheduler interfaces but
one of the main goals of that clean up is to make it possible to
then split out the scheduler to a separate project. I don't want
to
decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
-Original Message-
From: Ed Leafe [mailto:e...@leafe.com]
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 10:59 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] [gantt] Please stop using
Gantt for discussing about Nova scheduler
Bauza [mailto:sba...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 1:49 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] [gantt] Please stop using
Gantt for discussing about Nova scheduler
Le 31/03/2015 02:57, Dugger, Donald D a écrit
Message-
From: Sylvain Bauza [mailto:sba...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 1:49 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] [gantt] Please stop
using Gantt for discussing about Nova scheduler
Le 31/03/2015 02
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/02/2015 03:10 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
As a meeting is by definition a synchronous thing, should we maybe
try to async that decision using Gerrit ? I could pop up a
resolution in Gerrit so that people could -1 or +1 it.
To me, 'Gantt'
: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] [gantt] Please stop using
Gantt for discussing about Nova scheduler
Le 31/03/2015 02:57, Dugger, Donald D a écrit :
I actually prefer to use the term Gantt, it neatly encapsulates the
discussions and it doesn't take much effort to realize that Gantt refers
Le 31/03/2015 02:57, Dugger, Donald D a écrit :
I actually prefer to use the term Gantt, it neatly encapsulates the discussions
and it doesn't take much effort to realize that Gantt refers to the scheduler
and, if you feel there is confusion, we can clarify things in the wiki page to
I actually prefer to use the term Gantt, it neatly encapsulates the discussions
and it doesn't take much effort to realize that Gantt refers to the scheduler
and, if you feel there is confusion, we can clarify things in the wiki page to
emphasize the process: clean up the current scheduler
12 matches
Mail list logo
