Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception for Add config drive support for PCS containers

2015-02-16 Thread aburluka

Hi,
There are some questions about FFE policy that are not obvious for me as 
a newbie.
Last version of my change was submitted at February, 11th, and has not 
been changed since that date.
That change has +2 from Daniel and +1 from Garry Kotton and +1 from 
Pavel Kholkin. The only thing I needed
to merge this code was the last +2. Today I've got a comment from 
Michael Still who said that merge deadline
has expired. Can you please clarify, does this mean that this FFE was 
not accepted? Or should I wait a for further core review?
Anyway, is there any chance to merge this code in Kilo release? Change 
is ready and does not have any objections except expired deadline note 
from Michael.


Looking forward for your comments

On 02/12/2015 04:26 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 03:28:49PM +0300, aburluka wrote:

Hello,

I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for the change [1]
This change implements configuration drive support in Parallels containers.
It does not change existing Nova behaviour.
It's a last patch in parallels series, that implements blueprint pcs-support
[2].
Previous patches of that blueprint were merged. So it's the last one to
implement
initial Parallels Cloud Server support in Nova compute driver.

This change was reviewed by Daniel Berrange and Garry Kotton.
I am looking forward for your decision about considering this changes for a
feature freeze exception

I'm happy to sponsor this, given that it lets us complete the intended
level of support for parallels in Kilo. It does touch a bit of shared
code but the changes at straightforward and should not cause regression
in other drivers.

Regards,
Daniel


--
Regards,
Alexander Burluka


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception for Add config drive support for PCS containers

2015-02-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 02:53:08PM +0300, aburluka wrote:
 Hi,
 There are some questions about FFE policy that are not obvious for me as a
 newbie.
 Last version of my change was submitted at February, 11th, and has not been
 changed since that date.
 That change has +2 from Daniel and +1 from Garry Kotton and +1 from Pavel
 Kholkin. The only thing I needed
 to merge this code was the last +2. Today I've got a comment from Michael
 Still who said that merge deadline
 has expired. Can you please clarify, does this mean that this FFE was not
 accepted? Or should I wait a for further core review?
 Anyway, is there any chance to merge this code in Kilo release? Change is
 ready and does not have any objections except expired deadline note from
 Michael.

It would be better if the Nova core reviewers all replied to the FFE
mails to say whether they support them or not, but it seems most
have been ignoring all the emailed FFE requests :-(  None the less
there is a meeting today to finalize which FFEs will be approved.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception for Add config drive support for PCS containers

2015-02-16 Thread aburluka

Thank you so much for your help, Daniel

On 02/16/2015 02:57 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 02:53:08PM +0300, aburluka wrote:

Hi,
There are some questions about FFE policy that are not obvious for me as a
newbie.
Last version of my change was submitted at February, 11th, and has not been
changed since that date.
That change has +2 from Daniel and +1 from Garry Kotton and +1 from Pavel
Kholkin. The only thing I needed
to merge this code was the last +2. Today I've got a comment from Michael
Still who said that merge deadline
has expired. Can you please clarify, does this mean that this FFE was not
accepted? Or should I wait a for further core review?
Anyway, is there any chance to merge this code in Kilo release? Change is
ready and does not have any objections except expired deadline note from
Michael.

It would be better if the Nova core reviewers all replied to the FFE
mails to say whether they support them or not, but it seems most
have been ignoring all the emailed FFE requests :-(  None the less
there is a meeting today to finalize which FFEs will be approved.

Regards,
Daniel


--
Regards,
Alexander Burluka


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception for Add config drive support for PCS containers

2015-02-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 03:28:49PM +0300, aburluka wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for the change [1]
 This change implements configuration drive support in Parallels containers.
 It does not change existing Nova behaviour.
 It's a last patch in parallels series, that implements blueprint pcs-support
 [2].
 Previous patches of that blueprint were merged. So it's the last one to
 implement
 initial Parallels Cloud Server support in Nova compute driver.
 
 This change was reviewed by Daniel Berrange and Garry Kotton.
 I am looking forward for your decision about considering this changes for a
 feature freeze exception

I'm happy to sponsor this, given that it lets us complete the intended
level of support for parallels in Kilo. It does touch a bit of shared
code but the changes at straightforward and should not cause regression
in other drivers.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev