to then prioritize what needs to be implemented
then they do have a useful role to play.
Phil
From: Boris Pavlovic [mailto:bpavlo...@mirantis.com]
Sent: 28 August 2014 23:13
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken
On Aug 29, 2014, at 5:07 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh
alan.kavan...@ericsson.com mailto:alan.kavan...@ericsson.com wrote:
I share Donald's points here, I believe what would help is to
clearly
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?
On Aug 29, 2014 10:42 AM, Dugger, Donald D
donald.d.dug...@intel.commailto:donald.d.dug...@intel.com wrote:
Well, I think that there is a sign of a broken (or at least bent) process and
that's what I'm trying to expose
Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh
alan.kavan...@ericsson.com mailto:alan.kavan...@ericsson.com wrote:
I share Donald's points here, I believe what would help is to
clearly describe in the Wiki the process and workflow for the BP
approval process
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 03:44:25PM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/27/2014 09:04 PM, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
I’ll try and not whine about my pet project but I do think there is a
problem here. For the Gantt project to split out the scheduler there is
a crucial BP that needs to be implemented (
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 04:27:59PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 08/28/2014 04:01 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh
alan.kavan...@ericsson.com mailto:alan.kavan...@ericsson.com wrote:
I share Donald's points here, I believe what would help is to
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:07:33AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh
alan.kavan...@ericsson.com mailto:alan.kavan...@ericsson.com wrote:
I share Donald's points here, I believe what would help is to
clearly describe in
Going a bit further up the thread where we are still talking about
spec reviews and not code reviews...
On 28 August 2014 21:42, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com wrote:
I would contend that that right there is an indication that there's a problem
with the process.
We got two
On 28 August 2014 21:58, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote:
On 08/28/2014 02:25 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/28/2014 04:05 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
The overall scheduler-lib Blueprint is marked with a high priority
at http://status.openstack.org/release/;. Hopefully that would
On 08/29/2014 12:25 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 28/08/14 17:02, Jay Pipes wrote:
I understand your frustration about the silence, but the silence from
core team members may actually be a loud statement about where their
priorities are.
I don't know enough about the Nova review situation to say
@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?
On 08/29/2014 12:25 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 28/08/14 17:02, Jay Pipes wrote:
I understand your frustration about the silence, but the silence from
core team members may actually be a loud statement about
I think the point is that if there were discussions that lead to
uncertainty about the split, they should have resulted in a - 1/-2 on the
spec instead of letting it sit there.
On Aug 29, 2014 9:46 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/29/2014 12:25 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 28/08/14
I think this is now more about code reviews, but this is important...
On 29 August 2014 10:30, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:07:33AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh
esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
-Original Message-
From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 4:35 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?
Going
lifeSorry folks, I just had a new daughter since Thursday so I'm on
PTO until Monday, so thanks to the people who discussed about the
blueprint I created and how we can avoid the problem raised by Don for Kilo.
/life
Answers inline.
Le 29/08/2014 19:42, John Garbutt a écrit :
I think this is
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 10:43 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?
On 08/29/2014 12:25 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 28/08/14 17:02, Jay Pipes wrote:
I understand your frustration about the silence
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:04:57AM +, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
I'll try and not whine about my pet project but I do think there
is a problem here. For the Gantt project to split out the scheduler
there is a crucial BP that needs to be implemented (
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89893/ )
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:04:57AM +, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
I'll try and not whine about my pet project but I do think there
is a problem here. For the Gantt project to split out the scheduler
there is a
On 08/27/2014 09:04 PM, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
I’ll try and not whine about my pet project but I do think there is a
problem here. For the Gantt project to split out the scheduler there is
a crucial BP that needs to be implemented (
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89893/ ) and, unfortunately,
On 08/28/2014 01:44 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/27/2014 09:04 PM, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
I understand that reviews are a burden and very hard but it seems wrong
that a BP with multiple positive reviews and no negative reviews is
dropped because of what looks like indifference.
I would posit
On 08/28/2014 04:05 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 08/28/2014 01:44 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/27/2014 09:04 PM, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
I understand that reviews are a burden and very hard but it seems wrong
that a BP with multiple positive reviews and no negative reviews is
dropped because of
On 08/28/2014 02:25 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/28/2014 04:05 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 08/28/2014 01:44 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/27/2014 09:04 PM, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
I understand that reviews are a burden and very hard but it seems wrong
that a BP with multiple positive reviews and
Message- From: Jay Pipes
[mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 1:44 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
[nova] Is the BP approval process broken?
On 08/27/2014 09:04 PM, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
I'll try and not whine about my pet project
On 08/28/2014 03:02 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
I understand your frustration about the silence, but the silence from
core team members may actually be a loud statement about where their
priorities are.
Or it could be that they haven't looked at it, aren't aware of it, or
haven't been paying
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?
On 08/28/2014 03:02 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
I understand your frustration about the silence, but the silence from
core team members may actually be a loud statement about where
decisse. - D. Gale Ph:
303/443-3786
-Original Message- From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 1:44 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
[nova] Is the BP approval process broken?
On 08/27/2014 09:04 PM, Dugger
]
Sent: August-28-14 10:43 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?
I would contend that that right there is an indication that there's a problem
with the process. You submit a BP and then you have
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?
I would contend that that right there is an indication that there's a
problem with the process. You submit a BP and then you have no idea of
what is happening and no way of addressing any issues. If the priority
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?
I would contend that that right there is an indication that there's a
problem with the process. You submit a BP and then you have no idea of
what is happening
On 08/28/2014 04:01 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh
alan.kavan...@ericsson.com mailto:alan.kavan...@ericsson.com wrote:
I share Donald's points here, I believe what would help is to
clearly describe in the Wiki the process and workflow for the BP
] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?
On 08/28/2014 04:01 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh
alan.kavan...@ericsson.com mailto:alan.kavan...@ericsson.com wrote:
I share Donald's points here, I believe what would help is to
clearly describe
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com
wrote:
On 08/28/2014 04:01 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh
alan.kavan...@ericsson.com mailto:alan.kavan...@ericsson.com wrote:
I share Donald's points here, I believe what
32 matches
Mail list logo
