Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version
On Fri, 2017-02-10 at 12:35 -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 2/10/2017 11:18 AM, Thomas Bechtold wrote: > > > > For SUSE the wiki is updated and 1.2.9 should be fine. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Tom > > > > Thanks Tom. > > Would 1.3.1 as the next minimum in Queens be acceptable for SUSE? Yes. Cheers, Tom __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version
On 2/10/2017 11:18 AM, Thomas Bechtold wrote: For SUSE the wiki is updated and 1.2.9 should be fine. Cheers, Tom Thanks Tom. Would 1.3.1 as the next minimum in Queens be acceptable for SUSE? -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version
Hi, On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 17:29 -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Since danpb hasn't been around I've sort of forgotten about this, but > we > should talk about bumping the minimum required libvirt version in > nova. > > Currently it's 1.2.1 and the next was set to 1.2.9. > > On master we're gating on ubuntu 14.04 which has libvirt 1.3.1 > (14.04 > had 1.2.2). > > If we move to require 1.2.9 that effectively kills 14.04 support for > devstack + libvirt on master, which is probably OK. > > There is also the distro support wiki [1] which hasn't been updated > in > awhile. For SUSE the wiki is updated and 1.2.9 should be fine. Cheers, Tom __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:29:22PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> Since danpb hasn't been around I've sort of forgotten about this, but we
> should talk about bumping the minimum required libvirt version in nova.
>
> Currently it's 1.2.1 and the next was set to 1.2.9.
>
> On master we're gating on ubuntu 14.04 which has libvirt 1.3.1 (14.04 had
> 1.2.2).
>
> If we move to require 1.2.9 that effectively kills 14.04 support for
> devstack + libvirt on master, which is probably OK.
>
> There is also the distro support wiki [1] which hasn't been updated in
> awhile.
>
> I'm wondering if 1.2.9 is a safe move for the next required minimum version
> and if so, does anyone have ideas on the next required version after that?
1.2.9 was release on OCT 2014.
And there have been 26 releases from 1.2.9 until now:
1.2.{10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21}
1.3.{0,1,2,3,4,5}
2.0.0 [01 JUL 2016]
2.1.0 [02 AUG 2016]
2.2.0 [02 SEP 2016]
2.3.0 [04 OCT 2016]
2.4.0 [01 NOV 2016]
2.5.0 [04 DEC 2016]
3.0.0 [17 JAN 2017]
3.1.0 [Unreleased, as of 10-FEB-2017]
IIUC, going by how[X] Dan settled on 1.1.1, as minimum version for
Newton, it seems like have to mine through the current releases,
that'll:
- provide unconditional support for specific features we need;
- removes need for maintaining backward compatibility code
[X]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2015-October/008400.html
---
Good news for future: Upstream libvirt recently started an effort to
make release notes more consumable, by writing more 'structured' release
notes, and categorizing the work into: new Features; improvements; and
bug fixes.
You can see the result by comparing this page:
http://libvirt.org/news.html
With the older releases (where it's mostly information from Git
commits):
http://libvirt.org/news-2016.html
[...]
--
/kashyap
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version
On 02/09/2017 05:51 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Matt Riedemann" >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> , >> openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org >> Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 6:29:22 PM >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version >> >> Since danpb hasn't been around I've sort of forgotten about this, but we >> should talk about bumping the minimum required libvirt version in nova. >> >> Currently it's 1.2.1 and the next was set to 1.2.9. >> >> On master we're gating on ubuntu 14.04 which has libvirt 1.3.1 (14.04 >> had 1.2.2). >> >> If we move to require 1.2.9 that effectively kills 14.04 support for >> devstack + libvirt on master, which is probably OK. > > This would also kill off RHEL/CentOS 7.1 support but that would also seem to > be OK at this point. Our distro support policy is to at minimum support latest Ubuntu LTS and latest RHEL. I think given that it's more than fine for us to drop support for 14.04 and RHEL 7.1 in master. >> There is also the distro support wiki [1] which hasn't been updated in >> awhile. > > I've added the details I have for Fedora 25 and RHEL/CentOS 7.3, TL;DR: > > Fedora 25: > Libvirt 2.2.0 > Qemu 2.7.1 > Libguestfs 1.34.3 > > RHEL 7.3: > Libvirt 2.0.0 > Qemu 2.6.0 > Libguestfs 1.32.7 So I think, sadly, that means: Libvirt: 1.3.1 Qemu: 2.5 Libguestfs: 1.32.3 Which are all the Xenial versions and what we're testing in the gate (and older than the RHEL or Fedora versions) FWIW, Yakkety has: Libvirt: 2.1.0 Qemu: 2.6.1 Libguestfs: 1.32.7 so progress does seem to be being made there. > >> I'm wondering if 1.2.9 is a safe move for the next required minimum >> version and if so, does anyone have ideas on the next required version >> after that? >> >> I'm hoping some of the Red Hat people can chime in here. > > I just play someone intelligent on TV so adding Sahid and Vladik who might be > better placed to comment in Dan's absence. > > Thanks, > > Steve > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version
- Original Message - > From: "Matt Riedemann" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > , > openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org > Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 6:29:22 PM > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version > > Since danpb hasn't been around I've sort of forgotten about this, but we > should talk about bumping the minimum required libvirt version in nova. > > Currently it's 1.2.1 and the next was set to 1.2.9. > > On master we're gating on ubuntu 14.04 which has libvirt 1.3.1 (14.04 > had 1.2.2). > > If we move to require 1.2.9 that effectively kills 14.04 support for > devstack + libvirt on master, which is probably OK. This would also kill off RHEL/CentOS 7.1 support but that would also seem to be OK at this point. > There is also the distro support wiki [1] which hasn't been updated in > awhile. I've added the details I have for Fedora 25 and RHEL/CentOS 7.3, TL;DR: Fedora 25: Libvirt 2.2.0 Qemu 2.7.1 Libguestfs 1.34.3 RHEL 7.3: Libvirt 2.0.0 Qemu 2.6.0 Libguestfs 1.32.7 > I'm wondering if 1.2.9 is a safe move for the next required minimum > version and if so, does anyone have ideas on the next required version > after that? > > I'm hoping some of the Red Hat people can chime in here. I just play someone intelligent on TV so adding Sahid and Vladik who might be better placed to comment in Dan's absence. Thanks, Steve -- Steve Gordon, Principal Product Manager, Red Hat OpenStack Platform __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
