ristopher Yeoh
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 01/28/2015 09:37 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Questions on pep8 F811 hacking check
for microversion
On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 07:31:19 -0500
Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 01/06/2015 06:25 AM, Chen CH Ji wrote:
> > Based
pes Yeoh ---01/28/2015 09:37:00 AM---On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 07:31:19 -0500 Jay
> Pipes wrote:
>
> From: Christopher Yeoh
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Date: 01/28/2015 09:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Questions on pep8 F811 hacking check
> for microversi
: jiche...@cn.ibm.com
Phone: +86-10-82454158
Address: 3/F Ring Building, ZhongGuanCun Software Park, Haidian District,
Beijing 100193, PRC
From: Christopher Yeoh
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 01/28/2015 09:37 AM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Questions on pep8
On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 07:31:19 -0500
Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 01/06/2015 06:25 AM, Chen CH Ji wrote:
> > Based on nova-specs api-microversions.rst
> > we support following function definition format, but it violate the
> > hacking rule pep8 F811 because duplicate function definition
> > we should use
On 01/06/2015 06:25 AM, Chen CH Ji wrote:
> Based on nova-specs api-microversions.rst
> we support following function definition format, but it violate the
> hacking rule pep8 F811 because duplicate function definition
> we should use #noqa for them , but considering microversion may live for
> lon
2015-01-06 20:31 GMT+08:00 Jay Pipes :
> On 01/06/2015 06:25 AM, Chen CH Ji wrote:
>
>> Based on nova-specs api-microversions.rst
>> we support following function definition format, but it violate the
>> hacking rule pep8 F811 because duplicate function definition
>> we should use #noqa for them ,
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 07:31:19AM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 01/06/2015 06:25 AM, Chen CH Ji wrote:
> >Based on nova-specs api-microversions.rst
> >we support following function definition format, but it violate the
> >hacking rule pep8 F811 because duplicate function definition
> >we should use
On 01/06/2015 06:25 AM, Chen CH Ji wrote:
Based on nova-specs api-microversions.rst
we support following function definition format, but it violate the
hacking rule pep8 F811 because duplicate function definition
we should use #noqa for them , but considering microversion may live for
long time ,
