Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec

On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 16:55 -0800, Yuhong Bao wrote: > > > I read the patent and it looks like UEFI or for that matter any > > > non > > > -Windows implementation of FAT would probably not infringe on the > > > patent. > > > > Well, I'm not going to give you a legal opinion. However, most > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec

On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 18:03 +, Yuhong Bao wrote: > James Bottomley writes: > > As you can see, they're mostly expired (in the US) but the last one > > will expire in 2020 (if I calculate the date correctly). > If you are referring to US6286013, That's the latest

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec

James Bottomley writes: > As you can see, they're mostly expired (in the US) but the last one > will expire in 2020 (if I calculate the date correctly). If you are referring to US6286013, I read the patent and it looks like UEFI or for that matter any non-Windows

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec

On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 08:46 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > On 12/04/2015 08:34 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:43:41AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > > > That seems weird enough that I'd rather push back on our Platinum > > > Board > > > member to fix the licensing before we

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec

> -Original Message- > From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 9:47 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI > spec > > On 12/04/2015 08:34 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec

On 12/10/2015 2:21 AM, Ren, Qiaowei wrote: -Original Message- From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 9:47 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec On 12/04/2015 08:34 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec

> -Original Message- > From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 9:47 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI > spec > > On 12/04/2015 08:34 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec

On 12/03/2015 08:42 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 12/3/2015 9:35 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> The boot from UEFI spec [1] is stalled a bit on testing concerns. I've >> asked that there is integration testing (either upstream or Intel hosts >> a 3rd party job for it), or we log a warning

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:43:41AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > Can someone explain the licensing issue here? The Fedora comments make > this sound like this is something that's not likely to end up in distros. The EDK codebase contains a FAT driver which has a license that forbids reusing the code

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec

On 12/04/2015 08:34 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:43:41AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: >> Can someone explain the licensing issue here? The Fedora comments make >> this sound like this is something that's not likely to end up in distros. > > The EDK codebase contains a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec

@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec On 12/04/2015 08:34 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:43:41AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: >> Can someone explain the licensing issue here? The Fedora comments make >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 07:42:43PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I already mentioned this to sdague before the nova meeting today (these are > the things I think about while driving in the middle of nowhere), but option > #3 won't work because boot from UEFI requires libvirt>=1.9.0, which we

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec

On 12/3/2015 9:35 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: The boot from UEFI spec [1] is stalled a bit on testing concerns. I've asked that there is integration testing (either upstream or Intel hosts a 3rd party job for it), or we log a warning when it's used saying it's untested and therefore considered