@lists.openstack.org, John
Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com
Sent: Thursday, 19 December, 2013 10:37:27 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:47:30PM +0100, Vladik Romanovsky wrote:
I think it was:
ceilometer sample-list -m cpu_util -q 'resource_id
(not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, John
Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com
Sent: Thursday, 19 December, 2013 10:37:27 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:47:30PM +0100, Vladik Romanovsky wrote:
I think
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:56:47PM +0400, Oleg Gelbukh wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm sorry for being late to the thread, but what about baremetal driver?
Should it support the get_diagnostics() as well?
Of course, where practical, every driver should aim to support every
method in the virt driver
On Friday, December 20, 2013 3:57:15 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:56:47PM +0400, Oleg Gelbukh wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm sorry for being late to the thread, but what about baremetal driver?
Should it support the get_diagnostics() as well?
Of course, where
Matt,
My understanding is that there will be a nova.virt.baremetal.ironic driver
in Nova which will talk to Ironic API to manage bare-metal instances. So,
Ironic will be actually providing the diagnostics data about bm instance
via its API eventually.
Hope someone will correct me if I'm wrong.
On 16 December 2013 15:50, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +, John Garbutt wrote:
On 16 December 2013 15:25, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:58:24AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
I'd like to propose the
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:27:40PM +, John Garbutt wrote:
On 16 December 2013 15:50, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +, John Garbutt wrote:
On 16 December 2013 15:25, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013
@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Thursday, 19 December, 2013 9:34:02 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:27:40PM +, John Garbutt wrote:
On 16 December 2013 15:50, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +
, 2013 9:34:02 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:27:40PM +, John Garbutt wrote:
On 16 December 2013 15:50, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +, John Garbutt wrote:
On 16
questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Thursday, 19 December, 2013 9:34:02 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:27:40PM +, John Garbutt wrote:
On 16 December 2013 15:50, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:28:30AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
Following the discussion yesterday I have updated the wiki - please see
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova_VM_Diagnostics. The proposal is
backwards compatible and will hopefully provide us with the tools to be
able to
On 12/19/13 5:50 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:28:30AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
Following the discussion yesterday I have updated the wiki - please see
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://wiki.openstack.org/wik
On 12/19/13 6:07 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:02:16AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
On 12/19/13 5:50 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:28:30AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
Following the
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, John
Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com
Sent: Thursday, 19 December, 2013 10:37:27 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:47:30PM +0100, Vladik Romanovsky wrote
Hi,
Following the discussion yesterday I have updated the wiki - please see
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova_VM_Diagnostics. The proposal is
backwards compatible and will hopefully provide us with the tools to be
able to troubleshoot VM issues.
Thanks
Gary
On 12/16/13 5:50 PM, Daniel P.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:58:24AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
At the moment the administrator is able to retrieve diagnostics for a running
VM. Currently the implementation is very loosely defined, that is, each
driver returns whatever they have to return. This is problematic in a number
On 16 December 2013 15:25, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:58:24AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
At the moment the administrator is able to retrieve diagnostics for a
running VM. Currently the implementation is very loosely defined, that is,
each
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +, John Garbutt wrote:
On 16 December 2013 15:25, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:58:24AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
I'd like to propose the following for the V3 API (we will not touch V2
in case operators have
On 12/16/13 5:25 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:58:24AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
At the moment the administrator is able to retrieve diagnostics for a
running VM. Currently the implementation is very loosely defined, that
is, each driver
19 matches
Mail list logo
