> From: William M Edmonds/Raleigh/IBM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)"
>
> Date: 01/08/2018 03:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Working toward Queens feature
> freeze and RC1
>
> > From: Matt Riedemann
> &
> From: Matt Riedemann
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Date: 01/03/2018 07:03 PM
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Working toward Queens feature freeze and
RC1
>
... snip ...
> The rest of the blueprints are tracked here:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.
W dniu 04.01.2018 o 01:02, Matt Riedemann pisze:
> I've started building a list of things that need to be done by the time
> we get to RC1:
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-queens-release-candidate-todo
Can I add two small tweaks needed for AArch64 architecture to your list?
https://rev
Folks-
>> - NRP affordance in GET /allocation_candidates
>> . PATCHES: -
>> . STATUS: Not proposed
>> . PRIORITY: Critical
>> . OWNER: jaypipes
>> . DESCRIPTION: In the current master branch, the placement API will
>> report allocation candidates from [(a single non-sharing provider
On 01/04/2018 01:38 PM, Eric Fried wrote:
Matt, et al-
* Nested resource providers: I'm going to need someone closer to this
work like Jay or Eric to provide an update on where things are at in the
series of changes and what absolutely needs to get done. I have
personally found it hard to track
Matt, et al-
> * Nested resource providers: I'm going to need someone closer to this
> work like Jay or Eric to provide an update on where things are at in the
> series of changes and what absolutely needs to get done. I have
> personally found it hard to track what the main focus items are for th