On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> I think it is reasonable to assume that our Juno work is easily capable
> of keeping the entire core team 100% busy until Kilo opens. So having
> people review v2.1 stuff on a feature branch is definitely going to
> impact the work we ge
On 2014-09-02 15:18:14 +0100 (+0100), Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Do we have any historic precedent of using feature branches in this kind
> of way in the past, either in Nova or other projects ? If so, I'd be
> interested in how successful it was.
[...]
The new Keystone API used a feature branch,
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 08:54:31AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> I think we finally got to a largely consensus agreement at the mid-cycle
> on the path forward for Nova v2.1 and microversioning. Summary for
> others: Nova v2.1 will be Nova v2 built on the v3 infrastructure (which
> is much cleaner), w
