On 12/08/2015 11:47 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> 2015-12-04 17:48 GMT+09:00 Sylvain Bauza :
>>>
>>> That leaves the out-of-tree discussion about custom filters and how we
>>> could have a consistent behaviour given that. Should we accept something in
>>> a
2015-12-09 21:20 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague :
> On 12/08/2015 11:47 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
>> Hi Sylvain,
>>
>> 2015-12-04 17:48 GMT+09:00 Sylvain Bauza :
That leaves the out-of-tree discussion about custom filters and how we
could have a consistent
On 12/06/15 at 02:49pm, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi Sean,
2015-12-02 23:23 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague :
We have previously agreed that scheduler hints in Nova are an open ended
thing. It's expected for sites to have additional scheduler filters
which expose new hints. The way we
Le 08/12/2015 21:23, Andrew Laski a écrit :
On 12/06/15 at 02:49pm, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi Sean,
2015-12-02 23:23 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague :
We have previously agreed that scheduler hints in Nova are an open
ended
thing. It's expected for sites to have additional scheduler
On 12/08/15 at 09:43pm, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Le 08/12/2015 21:23, Andrew Laski a écrit :
On 12/06/15 at 02:49pm, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi Sean,
2015-12-02 23:23 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague :
We have previously agreed that scheduler hints in Nova are an
open ended
thing. It's
2015-12-09 6:02 GMT+09:00 Andrew Laski :
>>
>> I'm fine with a new RPC call for getting the schema, but as I explained, I
>> think the schema should be accepting all the in-tree filter hints (ie.
>> nova.scheduler.filters.all_filters method), not only those which are enabled
>>
Hi Sylvain,
2015-12-04 17:48 GMT+09:00 Sylvain Bauza :
>>
>> That leaves the out-of-tree discussion about custom filters and how we
>> could have a consistent behaviour given that. Should we accept something in
>> a specific deployment while another deployment could 401 against
2015-12-04 16:48 GMT+08:00 Sylvain Bauza :
>
>
> Le 04/12/2015 04:21, Alex Xu a écrit :
>
>
>
> 2015-12-02 23:12 GMT+08:00 Sylvain Bauza :
>
>>
>>
>> Le 02/12/2015 15:23, Sean Dague a écrit :
>>
>>> We have previously agreed that scheduler hints in Nova are
Hi Sean,
2015-12-02 23:23 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague :
> We have previously agreed that scheduler hints in Nova are an open ended
> thing. It's expected for sites to have additional scheduler filters
> which expose new hints. The way we handle that with our strict
> jsonschema is that
Le 04/12/2015 04:21, Alex Xu a écrit :
2015-12-02 23:12 GMT+08:00 Sylvain Bauza >:
Le 02/12/2015 15:23, Sean Dague a écrit :
We have previously agreed that scheduler hints in Nova are an
open ended
thing. It's
2015-12-02 23:12 GMT+08:00 Sylvain Bauza :
>
>
> Le 02/12/2015 15:23, Sean Dague a écrit :
>
>> We have previously agreed that scheduler hints in Nova are an open ended
>> thing. It's expected for sites to have additional scheduler filters
>> which expose new hints. The way we
Le 02/12/2015 15:23, Sean Dague a écrit :
We have previously agreed that scheduler hints in Nova are an open ended
thing. It's expected for sites to have additional scheduler filters
which expose new hints. The way we handle that with our strict
jsonschema is that we allow additional
12 matches
Mail list logo