Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Why are we continuing to add new namespaced oslo libs?

2015-01-30 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/29/2015 05:24 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 01/24/2015 02:01 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 07:48 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, I've just noticed that oslo.log made it to global-requirements.txt 9 days

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Why are we continuing to add new namespaced oslo libs?

2015-01-29 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 01/24/2015 02:01 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 07:48 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, I've just noticed that oslo.log made it to global-requirements.txt 9 days ago. How come are we still adding some

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Why are we continuing to add new namespaced oslo libs?

2015-01-29 Thread Julien Danjou
On Thu, Jan 29 2015, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi Thomas, The Debian policy is that Python module packages should be named after the import statement in a source file. Meaning that if we do: import oslo_db then the package should be called python-oslo-db. This means that I will have to

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Why are we continuing to add new namespaced oslo libs?

2015-01-29 Thread Thierry Carrez
Julien Danjou wrote: On Thu, Jan 29 2015, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi Thomas, The Debian policy is that Python module packages should be named after the import statement in a source file. Meaning that if we do: import oslo_db then the package should be called python-oslo-db. This means

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Why are we continuing to add new namespaced oslo libs?

2015-01-29 Thread Joshua Harlow
Just something to note; anvil has never ran had issues with this (afaik). It seems fairly easy to have a mapping/algorithm/other... that is used imho (and this is just what anvil has); I don't recall that the number of problems with weird names has been any real issue when building rpms...

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Why are we continuing to add new namespaced oslo libs?

2015-01-29 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/24/2015 02:01 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 07:48 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, I've just noticed that oslo.log made it to global-requirements.txt 9 days ago. How come are we still adding some name.spaced oslo libs? Wasn't the outcome of the discussion in Paris

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Why are we continuing to add new namespaced oslo libs?

2015-01-23 Thread Louis Taylor
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 01:48:32AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: I've just noticed that oslo.log made it to global-requirements.txt 9 days ago. How come are we still adding some name.spaced oslo libs? Wasn't the outcome of the discussion in Paris that we shouldn't do that anymore, and that we

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Why are we continuing to add new namespaced oslo libs?

2015-01-23 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 07:48 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, I've just noticed that oslo.log made it to global-requirements.txt 9 days ago. How come are we still adding some name.spaced oslo libs? Wasn't the outcome of the discussion in Paris that we shouldn't do that anymore, and that we