Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][mistral] For how long is blocking executor deprecated?
Hi, On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 01:53:02PM +0700, Renat Akhmerov wrote: Can you please clarify for how long you plan to keep ‘blocking executor’ deprecated before complete removal? Like all deprecations. We just done it, so you have two cycles, we will remove it in Rocky. But as I said, this executor have never ever be tested. Even its currently default, this default was chosen to not default to 'eventlet' or 'threading', because this is an application choice and not a lib one. But this (bad) default and the poor logged message haven't helped to ensure application make the choice. That why blocking executor is not deprecated and all 'executor' parameters in oslo.messaging will become mandatory. Cheers, -- Mehdi Abaakouk mail: sil...@sileht.net irc: sileht signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][mistral] For how long is blocking executor deprecated?
Ok, I think I already got my question answered: https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/oslo.messaging/unreleased.html#deprecation-notes Thanks Renat Akhmerov @Nokia On 13 Jun 2017, 13:59 +0700, Renat Akhmerov, wrote: > Hi Oslo team, > > Can you please clarify for how long you plan to keep ‘blocking executor’ > deprecated before complete removal? > > We have to use it in Mistral for the time being. We plan to move away from > using it but the transition may take significant time, not this cycle for > sure. So we got worried when we heard the news that it’s now been deprecated. > > > Thanks > > Renat Akhmerov > @Nokia __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev