Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] In-tree functional test vision

2014-10-07 Thread Chris Dent
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Joe Gordon wrote: On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote: For constraints: Will tempest be available as a stable library? Is using tempest (or other same library across all projects) a good or bad thing? Seems there's some disagreement on both of

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] In-tree functional test vision

2014-10-07 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:28:23PM +0100, Chris Dent wrote: On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Joe Gordon wrote: On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote: For constraints: Will tempest be available as a stable library? Is using tempest (or other same library across all projects) a

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] In-tree functional test vision

2014-08-25 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote: In the Thoughts on the patch test failure rate and moving forward thread[1] there's discussion of moving some of the burden for functional testing to the individual projects. This seems like a good idea to me, but also seems

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] In-tree functional test vision

2014-08-25 Thread Chris Dent
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Joe Gordon wrote: [Other stuff snipped, thanks for that, good to have some pointers.] Why can't you run devstack locally? Maybe there are some changes we can make so its easier to run devstack locally first. I do run a local devstack, and throw in some tempest and

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] In-tree functional test vision

2014-08-25 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Joe Gordon wrote: [Other stuff snipped, thanks for that, good to have some pointers.] Why can't you run devstack locally? Maybe there are some changes we can make so its easier to run devstack