Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release] FFE for constraints update for python-tackerclient bug-fix release

[Thierry Carrez]

Matthew Thode wrote:
> It should have time to get in for the freeze, the question I have is
> 'What in openstack is broken if we update upper-contraints after the
> freeze instead of before?'

> A follow up question is 'does this need a global-requirements.txt bump?'

In other words, will the new tacker just work with the old client
release (just not exposing the new feature), or will it fail ? If it
fails, the global-requirements needs to be bumped to require >=0.12.0...

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release] FFE for constraints update for python-tackerclient bug-fix release

[Matthew Thode]

On 18-02-07 23:01:25, Yongsheng Gong wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The tacker client has na initial queens release which does not have right 
> reno notes. Recently I have added some reno patches.
> And also the team wants a feature  to land in the queens release.
> 
> I have requested the newer release at 
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/541638/ 
> 
> 
> The new feature is at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/541631/ 
> 
> 
> Please see how we can get it released?
> 

It should have time to get in for the freeze, the question I have is
'What in openstack is broken if we update upper-contraints after the
freeze instead of before?'

A follow up question is 'does this need a global-requirements.txt bump?'

+2 from me on the UC bump though

-- 
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev