enstack.org
> >Sent: Friday, September 4, 2015 12:16:24 PM
> >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] FFE request for heat wait condition
> support
> >
> >makes sense to me, +1
> >
> >mike
> >
> >On 09/04/2015 06:37 AM, Vitaly Gridnev wrote:
> >
Seems reasonable; +1.
-Ethan
>- Original Message -
>From: "michael mccune"
>To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>Sent: Friday, September 4, 2015 12:16:24 PM
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] FFE request for heat wait condition
>support
>
>make
makes sense to me, +1
mike
On 09/04/2015 06:37 AM, Vitaly Gridnev wrote:
+1 for FFE, because of
1. Low risk of issues, fully covered with current scenario tests;
2. Implementation already on review
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Sergey Reshetnyak
mailto:sreshetn...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
+1 for FFE, because of
1. Low risk of issues, fully covered with current scenario tests;
2. Implementation already on review
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Sergey Reshetnyak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to request FFE for wait condition support for Heat engine.
> Wait condition reports sig
