Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics]

2015-02-27 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 09:51:34AM +1100, Michael Still wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote: Does it make sense to purge old stuff regularly so we have a better

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics]

2015-02-27 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 16:44 -0800, James E. Blair wrote: It is good to recognize the impact of this, however, I would suggest that if having open changes that are not actively being worked is a problem for statistics, I don't think it's a problem for the statistics per se. The reports are only

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics]

2015-02-27 Thread Sean Dague
On 02/26/2015 05:41 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:58 -0600, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: One thing that comes to mind is that there are a lot of reviews that appear to have been abandoned; I just cleared several from the novaclient review queue (or commented on them to see

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics]

2015-02-27 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 09:51:34AM +1100, Michael Still wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote: Does it make sense to purge old stuff regularly so we have a better overview? Or maybe we should chart a distribution of age of proposed

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics]

2015-02-26 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:58 -0600, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: One thing that comes to mind is that there are a lot of reviews that appear to have been abandoned; I just cleared several from the novaclient review queue (or commented on them to see if they were still alive). I also know of a few

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics]

2015-02-26 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 14:18 -0600, Anne Gentle wrote: Do the features listed in the Release Notes each have appropriate documentation? So far we just link to the specifications for nova, for example. [1] So to me, it could be a focus on the specification acceptance means less time/energy for

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics]

2015-02-26 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 21:15 +, Ian Cordasco wrote: I read it the same was as Doug. I don’t think Jeremy was trying to imply your reviews would move through more quickly if you reviewed other people’s work. Just that, as with most open source projects, there’s always at least 2 distinct

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics]

2015-02-26 Thread Anne Gentle
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote: On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 21:15 +, Ian Cordasco wrote: I read it the same was as Doug. I don’t think Jeremy was trying to imply your reviews would move through more quickly if you reviewed other people’s work.

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics]

2015-02-26 Thread Ed Leafe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/26/2015 01:45 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: The interesting bit of those charts is that overall for OpenStack projects, it seems that the reviews (comments to patchsets) are arriving quite quickly but the new patchsets take a lot more to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics]

2015-02-26 Thread Michael Still
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote: Does it make sense to purge old stuff regularly so we have a better overview? Or maybe we should chart a distribution of age of proposed changesets, too in order to get a better understanding of where the outliers

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics]

2015-02-26 Thread James E. Blair
Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org writes: On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:58 -0600, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: One thing that comes to mind is that there are a lot of reviews that appear to have been abandoned; I just cleared several from the novaclient review queue (or commented on them to see

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics]

2015-02-26 Thread Kevin L. Mitchell
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 11:45 -0800, Stefano Maffulli wrote: The interesting bit of those charts is that overall for OpenStack projects, it seems that the reviews (comments to patchsets) are arriving quite quickly but the new patchsets take a lot more to be submitted. Too much debating and