> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 8:34 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][infra][qa] Preparing 2014.2.4 (Juno)
> WAS Re: [O
On 12/02/2015 04:11 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
>
> On 12/2/2015 2:33 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> [Apologies for the delayed reply, after more than a week without
>> Internet access it's taking me more than a week to catch up with
>> everything on the mailing lists.]
>>
>> On 2015-11-20
[Apologies for the delayed reply, after more than a week without
Internet access it's taking me more than a week to catch up with
everything on the mailing lists.]
On 2015-11-20 10:21:47 + (+), Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
[...]
> So we were brainstorming this with Rocky the other night. Would
>
On 12/2/2015 2:33 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
[Apologies for the delayed reply, after more than a week without
Internet access it's taking me more than a week to catch up with
everything on the mailing lists.]
On 2015-11-20 10:21:47 + (+), Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
[...]
So we were
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Pevec [mailto:ape...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 10:46 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][infra][qa] Preparing 2014.2.4 (Juno)
> WAS Re: [O
> So we were brainstorming this with Rocky the other night. Would this be
> possible to do by following:
> 1) we still tag juno EOL in few days time
> 2) we do not remove the stable/juno branch
Why not?
> 3) we run periodic grenade jobs for kilo
>From a quick look, grenade should work with a
> -Original Message-
> From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org]
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 10:45 AM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][infra][qa] Preparing 2014.2.4 (Juno)
> WAS Re: [Openstack-operators] [st
[stable][infra][qa] Preparing 2014.2.4 (Juno)
>> WAS Re: [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.
>>
>>> So we were brainstorming this with Rocky the other night. Would this be
>> possible to do by following:
>>> 1) we still
Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
> So we were brainstorming this with Rocky the other night. Would this be
> possible to do by following:
> 1) we still tag juno EOL in few days time
> 2) we do not remove the stable/juno branch
> 3) we run periodic grenade jobs for kilo
>
> I'm not that familiar with the
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 2:57 AM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Preparing 2014.2.4 (Juno) WAS Re:
> [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno
10 matches
Mail list logo
