John Griffith wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Jay S. Bryant
jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote:
All,
We have been getting a number of non-security patches proposed to
stable/icehouse for Cinder. The cores were discussing what was ok to put
into icehouse at this point in time and couldn't agree as to whether we were
at the point of only accepting security changes.
Appreciate advice on this topic.
Hey Jay,
Thanks for raising this, my understanding was that we were in fact
security only mode now for Icehouse. That being said I completely
forgot that it's been that long already and I let some reviews slip
myself just today in fact. Thanks for pointing it out.
Icehouse is now 9-month old, so it is in phase II support (only
critical bugfixes and security patches are acceptable).
Reference: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch#Support_phases
In case of doubt, you can ask stable-maint-core people for advice:
https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/530,members
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
