Thanks for the info.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Clay Gerrard
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Weidong Shao
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I noticed swauth project is not actively maintained. In my local testing,
>> swauth did not work after I upgraded swift to latest.
>>
>>
> Hrm... I thi
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Weidong Shao wrote:
>
> the url is encoded in the object hash! This somehow entangles the data
> storage/validity with its account and makes it difficult to migrate the
> data. I guess it is too late to debate on the design of this. Do you know
> the technical r
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Weidong Shao wrote:
>
> I noticed swauth project is not actively maintained. In my local testing,
> swauth did not work after I upgraded swift to latest.
>
>
Hrm... I think gholt would be open to patches/support, I know of a number
of deployers of Swauth - so mayb
John,
thanks for the reply. See questions inline.
thanks,
Weidong
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:23 AM John Dickinson wrote:
>
> > On Mar 9, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Weidong Shao wrote:
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > I have a standalone swift cluster with swauth as the auth module. By
> standalone, I mean the cluste
> On Mar 9, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Weidong Shao wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> I have a standalone swift cluster with swauth as the auth module. By
> standalone, I mean the cluster is not in the context of OpenStack, or
> keystone server.
That's completely fine (and not uncommon at all).
>
> Now I have mov
